MaineSaco

Seal Rock Healthcare

88 Harbor Drive, Saco, ME 04072 · York County · 105 certified beds · avg 91 residents/day · certified since Jan 1, 1993

Part of chain: FIRST ATLANTIC HEALTHCARE (10 facilities, chain avg rating 3.4★)

2/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
1
Serious findings on record
$75,433
Fines, last 3 years
4.98
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 2/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, repeated · Apr 2, 2025 · F-0880 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.

Why it matters: Weak infection control lets illnesses like flu, COVID-19, and drug-resistant infections spread quickly among vulnerable residents.

Severity (K): A life-threatening or extremely dangerous situation affected several residents. Among the most serious findings an inspection can produce.

Corrected: Apr 24, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (27)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Apr 3, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care.
Apr 3, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not protect residents from misuse of their belongings or money — this is called misappropriation, and it includes theft or improper use of a resident's property or funds.
Apr 3, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Apr 3, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make sure its nurse aides had the skills needed to care for residents, including training in dementia care and abuse prevention.
Apr 3, 2026B · Minimal risk, repeatedThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs.
Apr 2, 2025▲ K · Immediate jeopardy, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint
Apr 2, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not make sure its nurses and nurse aides had the skills and training needed to properly care for every resident. · from a complaint
Apr 2, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility was not managed in a way that uses its money, staff, and resources effectively and efficiently to care for residents. · from a complaint
Apr 2, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away. · from a complaint
Apr 2, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint
Aug 8, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint
Aug 8, 2023C · Minimal risk, facility-wideThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · from a complaint
Jul 27, 2022E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs.
Jul 27, 2022E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not create and follow a basic care plan covering a new resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of admission. The first days are when a new resident is most vulnerable.
Jul 27, 2022E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Jul 27, 2022E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards.
Jul 27, 2022E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not run an ongoing quality assurance committee that reviews care problems and creates plans to fix them.
Jul 27, 2022E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not keep its building and grounds safe, functional, clean, and comfortable for residents, staff, and visitors.
Jul 27, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
Jul 27, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Jul 27, 2022B · Minimal risk, repeatedThe facility did not give residents (and their representatives and the ombudsman, a state advocate for residents) proper advance notice before a transfer or discharge, including information about their right to appeal.
Jul 27, 2022B · Minimal risk, repeatedThe facility did not give the resident or their representative written notice of how long it would hold the resident's bed during a hospital stay or approved leave.
Jul 27, 2022B · Minimal risk, repeatedThe facility did not post its nurse staffing information every day. Nursing homes must publicly display how many nurses and aides are on duty each day.
Nov 7, 2019E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Nov 7, 2019D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make sure residents were fully informed about their own health, care, and treatments in a way they could understand.
Nov 7, 2019D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' right to make their own choices about their daily lives, such as when to wake up, what to eat, or how to spend their time.
Nov 7, 2019D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' individual preferences, choices, values, and beliefs in their daily life and care.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (11 → 5).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
201940E
2022110E
202320D
202551K ▲
202650E

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

1 fine totaling $75,433.

DateTypeAmount / length
Apr 2, 2025Fine$75,433

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityMaine avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)4.984.603.95top 30% in Maine; top 13% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.931.110.69bottom 37% in Maine; top 19% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing4.614.163.50top 23% in Maine; top 10% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.730.730.48bottom 49% in Maine; top 14% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)56.346.745.8bottom 18% in Maine; bottom 22% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)47.640.242.9bottom 34% in Maine; bottom 40% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.48, RN 0.84, weekend 4.14. Staffing rating: 4/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: 1/5 · short-stay residents: 4/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Faraday Holdings LLCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest67%06/29/2019
KWB Holdings, LLCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest33%06/29/2019
Berman, AriIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2024
Berman, AriIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE02/01/2019
Bowden, KennethIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE06/29/2019
Bowden, KennethIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE06/30/2019
Coffin, CraigIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE06/30/2019
Faraday Holdings LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE06/30/2019
First Atlantic Healthcare INCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE06/05/2005
First Atlantic Healthcare INCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE02/26/2025
Gilbert, JessicaIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2025
Gilbert, JessicaIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE08/01/2023
KWB Holdings, LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE06/30/2019
Otis-Higgins, AndreaIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE05/11/2015
Otis-Higgins, AndreaIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE05/11/2015
Otis-Higgins, AndreaIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE05/11/2015
Pelkey, WandaIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2024
Pelkey, WandaIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2024
Pelkey, WandaIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2024

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
St Andre Health Care Facility1.4 miBiddeford, ME★★★★★5/5
Southridge Rehab & Living Ctr2.3 miBiddeford, ME★★★☆☆3/5
Pine Point Center5.5 miScarborough, ME★★☆☆☆2/5
Maine Veterans Home - Scarborough6.7 miScarborough, ME★★★★★5/5
Piper Shores8.1 miScarborough, ME★★★★★4/5
Kennebunk Center for Health & Rehabilitation, LLC9.3 miKennebunk, ME★★☆☆☆2/5
River Ridge Center9.8 miKennebunk, ME★☆☆☆☆1/5SFF
Springbrook Center12.3 miWestbrook, ME★★☆☆☆1/5
Pinnacle Health & Rehab at South Portland12.5 miSo Portland, ME★★★☆☆3/5
Gorham House12.9 miGorham, ME★★★★★3/5
Barron Center13.4 miPortland, ME★★★★☆4/5
Seaside Healthcare LLC15.0 miPortland, ME★★★★☆4/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Saco →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 205103.