How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
2 Highway Y, Viburnum, MO 65566 (opens Google Maps) · Iron County · (573) 244-3171· 60 certified beds · avg 56 residents/day · certified since Jul 5, 1994 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: RELIANT CARE MANAGEMENT (34 facilities, chain avg rating 1.2★)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 2/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Showing the latest 3 of 21 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. F-0812
The facility did not have a working program to monitor how antibiotics are used. Tracking antibiotic use helps make sure these drugs are given only when needed and remain effective. F-0881
The facility did not properly protect the personal money residents deposited with it for safekeeping. F-0570
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Jul 31, 2025 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Jul 31, 2025 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not have a working program to monitor how antibiotics are used. Tracking antibiotic use helps make sure these drugs are given only when needed and remain effective. · F-0881 |
| Jul 31, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not properly protect the personal money residents deposited with it for safekeeping. · F-0570 |
| Jul 31, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Jul 31, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not maintain an effective pest control program to prevent or deal with mice, insects, or other pests. · F-0925 |
| Jul 31, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not give residents proper notice about what Medicare or Medicaid covers, or about charges the resident might owe for services that aren't covered. · F-0582 |
| Jul 31, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility gave residents unnecessary mind-altering (psychotropic) medications, or used drugs in a way that restrained residents by dulling their ability to think, move, or function. · F-0605 |
| Jul 31, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide required paperwork or notices about a resident's needs, their right to appeal a transfer or discharge, or the facility's bed-hold policy (how long a bed is saved during a hospital stay). · from a complaint · F-0628 |
| Jul 31, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689 |
| Jul 31, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections. · F-0690 |
| Jul 31, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time. · F-0759 |
| Mar 29, 2024 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Mar 29, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · F-0641 |
| Mar 29, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not create and follow a basic care plan covering a new resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of admission. The first days are when a new resident is most vulnerable. · F-0655 |
| Mar 29, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits. · F-0758 |
| Mar 29, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures for offering residents flu and pneumonia vaccinations. · F-0883 |
| Mar 29, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not make sure its nurse aides had the skills needed to care for residents, including training in dementia care and abuse prevention. · F-0947 |
| Oct 19, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not fully assess residents on time — a complete assessment of health, abilities, and needs is required when a resident is first admitted and at least once every 12 months after that. · F-0636 |
| Oct 19, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not enter each resident's assessment information into the required format and send it to the state within 7 days of completing the assessment, as the rules require. · F-0640 |
| Oct 19, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · F-0641 |
| Oct 19, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not make sure its nurse aides were properly trained — aides working more than 4 months must be trained and competent, and newer aides must be enrolled in training. · F-0728 |
Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (6 → 11).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 4 | 0 | D |
| 2024 | 6 | 0 | F |
| 2025 | 11 | 0 | F |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Missouri avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 2.08 | 3.66 | 3.95 | bottom 6% in Missouri; bottom 1% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.48 | 0.49 | 0.69 | top 39% in Missouri; bottom 34% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 1.90 | 3.22 | 3.50 | bottom 8% in Missouri; bottom 1% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.29 | 0.33 | 0.48 | top 44% in Missouri; bottom 30% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 50.0 | 56.0 | 45.8 | top 32% in Missouri; bottom 38% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 50.0 | 47.8 | 42.9 | top 46% in Missouri; bottom 39% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 2.57, RN 0.59, weekend 2.35.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (2.57 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 1/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: 3/5 · short-stay residents: —/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Stonecrest Healthcare. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Corporation
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arshad, Abdullah | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/15/2024 |
| Arshad, Abdullah | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/15/2024 |
| Bky Properties Viburnum LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/01/2010 |
| Destefane, Richard | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/01/2010 |
| Destefane, Richard | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/01/2010 |
| Destefane, Richard | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/01/2018 |
| Greene, Julia | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/27/2024 |
| Greene, Julia | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/27/2024 |
| Reliant Care Management Company LLC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/01/2010 |
| Reliant Care Management Company LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/13/2025 |
| Richard J. Destefane Revocable Living Trust | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/01/2018 |
| TLG II LLP | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/01/2010 |
All 12 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.
CMS lists this facility under the chain Reliant Care Management — 34 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 33 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Belleview Valley Nursing Home | 20.1 mi | Belleview, MO | —/5 | SFF | |
| Steelville Senior Living | 21.2 mi | Steelville, MO | ★☆☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Salem Care Center | 22.6 mi | Salem, MO | ★★☆☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Potosi Manor | 23.8 mi | Potosi, MO | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Seville Care Center | 24.1 mi | Salem, MO | ★☆☆☆☆ | 2/5 | abuse |
| Salem Memorial District Hospital | 24.1 mi | Salem, MO | ★★★☆☆ | 4/5 | |
| Gardens Health and Rehab, the | 24.4 mi | Potosi, MO | ★☆☆☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Cuba Manor INC | 28.2 mi | Cuba, MO | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Baptist Homes of Arcadia Valley | 30.5 mi | Ironton, MO | —/5 | ||
| Meramec Nursing | 32.8 mi | Sullivan, MO | ★☆☆☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| St James Living Center | 32.8 mi | Saint James, MO | ★★★☆☆ | 4/5 | |
| Life Care Center of Sullivan | 33.5 mi | Sullivan, MO | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 |
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 265582.
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details