MissouriMount Vernon

Mt Vernon Nursing

1425 South Landrum, Mount Vernon, MO 65712 · Lawrence County · 60 certified beds · avg 45 residents/day · certified since May 3, 1991

Part of chain: COMMUNITY CARE CENTERS (8 facilities, chain avg rating 2.6★)

4/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
1
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
3.18
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Apr 7, 2023 · F-0678

The facility did not provide basic life support, such as CPR, before emergency medical help arrived — care that's required when it matches the doctor's orders and the resident's own written wishes.

Why it matters: In a cardiac or breathing emergency, failure to start CPR promptly can be the difference between life and death.

Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.

Corrected: Feb 1, 2023 (Past Non-Compliance)

All citations in the current public record (12)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Oct 10, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Oct 10, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not give residents (and their representatives and the ombudsman, a state advocate for residents) proper advance notice before a transfer or discharge, including information about their right to appeal.
Oct 10, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not give the resident or their representative written notice of how long it would hold the resident's bed during a hospital stay or approved leave.
Oct 10, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not serve food and drinks that were appetizing, attractive, and at a safe and pleasant temperature.
Oct 10, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Oct 10, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Aug 28, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents' personal and medical information private and confidential. · from a complaint
Apr 7, 2023▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-offThe facility did not provide basic life support, such as CPR, before emergency medical help arrived — care that's required when it matches the doctor's orders and the resident's own written wishes.
Apr 7, 2023F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Apr 7, 2023F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not have enough backup water supply for essential areas of the building.
Apr 7, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits.
Apr 7, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (5 → 6).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202351J ▲
202470F

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityMissouri avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.183.663.95bottom 30% in Missouri; bottom 21% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.550.490.69top 30% in Missouri; bottom 45% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing2.883.223.50bottom 38% in Missouri; bottom 25% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.240.330.48bottom 41% in Missouri; bottom 20% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)37.556.045.8top 8% in Missouri; top 30% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)0.047.842.9top 1% in Missouri; top 1% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.08, RN 0.53, weekend 2.78. Staffing rating: 3/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 2/5 · long-stay residents: 1/5 · short-stay residents: 2/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Limited Liability company

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
GC Asset Management LLCOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE01/28/2025
Weiner, CraigIndividual5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest50%06/01/2023
Weiner, GinaIndividual5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest50%06/01/2023
GC Asset Management LLCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/28/2025
Hert, KellyIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/28/2025
Hert, KellyIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/28/2025
Weiner, CraigIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/28/2025
Weiner, GinaIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/28/2025
Williams, CherylIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/28/2025
Williams, CherylIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/07/2026

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Lawrence County Manor0.4 miMount Vernon, MO★☆☆☆☆1/5
Ascend at Aurora11.1 miAurora, MO★☆☆☆☆1/5abuse
Ozarks Methodist Manor, the12.1 miMarionville, MO★☆☆☆☆2/5
Lacoba Homes INC13.9 miMonett, MO★★★★★5/5
Sarcoxie Health Care Center16.8 miSarcoxie, MO★☆☆☆☆2/5
Republic Nursing & Rehab19.5 miRepublic, MO★★★★★4/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Mount Vernon →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 265452.