MissouriArnold

South County Health Care Center

1101 West Outer 21 Road, Arnold, MO 63010 · Jefferson County · 153 certified beds · avg 86 residents/day · certified since Oct 12, 1992

Abuse citation flag (CMS)

Part of chain: RELIANT CARE MANAGEMENT (34 facilities, chain avg rating 1.2★)

The abuse flag means inspectors cited this facility for abuse that caused harm to a resident within the past year, or potential for harm in each of the last two years. Source: CMS.

2/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
1
Serious findings on record
$93,995
Fines, last 3 years
1.32
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 1/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Mar 27, 2026 · F-0600 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.

Why it matters: Abuse and neglect cause direct physical and emotional harm and are among the most serious failures a nursing home can have.

Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.

Corrected: Mar 26, 2026 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (33)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Jun 16, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · from a complaint
Jun 16, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Apr 16, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · from a complaint
Apr 16, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · from a complaint
Mar 27, 2026▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint
Aug 7, 2025F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Aug 7, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not properly protect the personal money residents deposited with it for safekeeping.
Aug 7, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs.
Aug 7, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft. These written safeguards are the foundation of resident protection.
Aug 7, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care.
Aug 7, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make sure a transfer or discharge met the resident's needs and preferences, or did not properly prepare the resident to leave safely.
Aug 7, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide required paperwork or notices about a resident's needs, their right to appeal a transfer or discharge, or the facility's bed-hold policy (how long a bed is saved during a hospital stay).
Aug 7, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.
Aug 7, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Aug 7, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections.
Aug 7, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Aug 7, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility used bed rails without first trying safer alternatives, or without assessing the resident's safety risk, discussing the risks and benefits with the resident or family, getting consent, and installing the rails correctly.
Aug 7, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time.
Aug 7, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not serve food and drinks that were appetizing, attractive, and at a safe and pleasant temperature.
Aug 7, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Aug 7, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not regularly inspect bed frames, mattresses, and bed rails for safety, or the rails and mattresses were not attached safely to the frames.
Aug 7, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make sure its nurse aides had the skills needed to care for residents, including training in dementia care and abuse prevention.
Aug 7, 2025C · Minimal risk, facility-wideThe facility did not make its inspection results easy for residents to see, or made it hard for residents to contact advocacy agencies like the ombudsman.
Aug 7, 2025C · Minimal risk, facility-wideThe facility did not post its nurse staffing information every day. Nursing homes must publicly display how many nurses and aides are on duty each day.
May 29, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint
Aug 22, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Aug 22, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
Aug 22, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Mar 24, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.
Mar 24, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Mar 24, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Mar 24, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Mar 24, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (3 → 19).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202350D
202430F
2025200F
202651J ▲

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

1 fine totaling $93,995, plus 1 Medicare payment denial period.

DateTypeAmount / length
Mar 27, 2026Fine$93,995
Mar 27, 2026Payment Denial57 days from May 13, 2026

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityMissouri avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)1.323.663.95bottom 1% in Missouri; bottom 1% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.160.490.69bottom 5% in Missouri; bottom 1% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing1.133.223.50bottom 1% in Missouri; bottom 1% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.120.330.48bottom 7% in Missouri; bottom 3% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)0.056.045.8
RN turnover (%)0.047.842.9

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 1.40, RN 0.17, weekend 1.21. Staffing rating: 1/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: 3/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Limited Liability company

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Destefane, RichardIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2025
RCG INCOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2025
Reliant Care Group LLCOrganizationDirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2025
Richard J. Destefane Revocable Living TrustOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2025
Arshad, AbdullahIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2025
Arshad, AbdullahIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2025
Destefane, RichardIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2025
Destefane, RichardIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2025
Magnussen, KatinaIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2025
Magnussen, KatinaIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2025
Reliant Care Management Company LLCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2025
Reliant Care Management Company LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/21/2025
Richard J. Destefane Revocable Living TrustOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2025
South County Associates I, L.L.C.OrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2025
TLG II LLPOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2025

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Woodland Manor Nursing Center2.6 miArnold, MO★★☆☆☆4/5
Delmar Gardens South2.7 miSaint Louis, MO★★★★☆4/5
Maple Grove Wellness & Rehabilitation3.2 miFenton, MO★☆☆☆☆2/5
Delmar Gardens of Meramec Valley3.2 miFenton, MO★★★★★5/5
Fieser Nursing Center3.7 miFenton, MO★★☆☆☆2/5
Friendship Village Sunset Hills4.6 miSaint Louis, MO★★★☆☆3/5
Fountain Care at Sunset Hills4.9 miSaint Louis, MO★☆☆☆☆1/5
Nazareth Living Center6.4 miSaint Louis, MO★☆☆☆☆2/5
Bethesda Southgate6.9 miSaint Louis, MO★★★★★5/5
Bluebird Wellness and Rehabilitation7.0 miSaint Louis, MO★☆☆☆☆1/5
Big Bend Woods Healthcare Center7.5 miValley Park, MO★☆☆☆☆3/5
Garden View Care Center at Dougherty Ferry7.8 miValley Park, MO★★★★☆5/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Arnold →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 265509.