How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
Rosemont Center
35 Rosemont Avenue, Rosemont, PA 19010 (opens Google Maps) · Delaware County · (610) 580-0400· 76 certified beds · avg 65 residents/day · certified since Mar 29, 1967 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: LME FAMILY HOLDINGS (15 facilities, chain avg rating 2.1★)
3/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
inspected Sep 8, 2025
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
3.07
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)
Every record stays on this page.
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Inspection findings in the public record
Showing the latest 3 of 32 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint F-0689
The facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. F-0610
The facility did not keep all essential equipment working safely — things like heating and cooling systems, kitchen equipment, and medical devices. F-0908
View all 32 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Feb 26, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint · F-0689 |
| Sep 8, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. · F-0610 |
| Sep 8, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not keep all essential equipment working safely — things like heating and cooling systems, kitchen equipment, and medical devices. · F-0908 |
| Sep 8, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not honor residents' right to share a room with their spouse or a roommate of their choosing, or moved residents to a different room without written notice beforehand. · F-0559 |
| Sep 8, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep residents' personal and medical information private and confidential. · F-0583 |
| Sep 8, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not honor residents' right to voice complaints without discrimination or retaliation, or did not have a working complaint process that resolves issues promptly. · F-0585 |
| Sep 8, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · F-0657 |
| Sep 8, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · F-0658 |
| Sep 8, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline. · F-0688 |
| Sep 8, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not make sure its nurses and nurse aides had the skills and training needed to properly care for every resident. · F-0726 |
| Sep 8, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Sep 8, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Oct 11, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint · F-0656 |
| Oct 11, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep residents' personal and medical information private and confidential. · from a complaint · F-0583 |
| Oct 11, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not give residents (and their representatives and the ombudsman, a state advocate for residents) proper advance notice before a transfer or discharge, including information about their right to appeal. · from a complaint · F-0623 |
| Oct 11, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not reassess a resident after a significant change in their condition, such as a sudden decline in health. A full new assessment is required when a resident's condition changes in a major way. · from a complaint · F-0637 |
| Oct 11, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline. · from a complaint · F-0688 |
| Oct 11, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · from a complaint · F-0695 |
| Oct 11, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint · F-0880 |
| Jun 25, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep its building and grounds safe, functional, clean, and comfortable for residents, staff, and visitors. · from a complaint · F-0921 |
| May 15, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away. · from a complaint · F-0580 |
| Feb 1, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| Feb 1, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not safely and appropriately administer IV fluids (fluids given through a vein) for residents who needed them. · F-0694 |
| Feb 1, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not make sure its nurses and nurse aides had the skills and training needed to properly care for every resident. · F-0726 |
| Feb 1, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not run an ongoing quality assurance committee that reviews care problems and creates plans to fix them. · F-0867 |
| Feb 1, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not make sure its nurse aides had the skills needed to care for residents, including training in dementia care and abuse prevention. · F-0947 |
| Nov 28, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not honor residents' right to share a room with their spouse or a roommate of their choosing, or moved residents to a different room without written notice beforehand. · from a complaint · F-0559 |
| Oct 11, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint · F-0684 |
| Sep 28, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint · F-0656 |
| Sep 28, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · from a complaint · F-0677 |
| Sep 28, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline. · from a complaint · F-0688 |
| Sep 28, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it. · from a complaint · F-0697 |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (7 → 11).
All citationsSerious citations (G–L)
2023
All citations: 6
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2024
All citations: 14
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2025
All citations: 11
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2026
All citations: 1
Serious citations (G–L): 0
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 6 | 0 | D |
| 2024 | 14 | 0 | E |
| 2025 | 11 | 0 | E |
| 2026 | 1 | 0 | D |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
What these staffing numbers mean →
This facilityPennsylvania averageU.S. average
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)
This facility: 3.07
Pennsylvania average: 3.94
U.S. average: 3.95
Registered Nurse hours
This facility: 0.49
Pennsylvania average: 0.80
U.S. average: 0.69
Weekend total nurse staffing
This facility: 2.91
Pennsylvania average: 3.58
U.S. average: 3.50
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Pennsylvania avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.07 | 3.94 | 3.95 | bottom 15% in Pennsylvania; bottom 16% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.49 | 0.80 | 0.69 | bottom 23% in Pennsylvania; bottom 36% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 2.91 | 3.58 | 3.50 | bottom 21% in Pennsylvania; bottom 26% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.35 | 0.56 | 0.48 | bottom 34% in Pennsylvania; bottom 43% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 55.7 | 44.5 | 45.8 | bottom 20% in Pennsylvania; bottom 24% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 50.0 | 39.9 | 42.9 | bottom 31% in Pennsylvania; bottom 39% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.31, RN 0.52, weekend 3.13.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.31 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 2/5.
Quality measures: assessments & claims
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 4/5
Costs & payment
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Rosemont Center. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Calculate a stay from a quote you receive
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Before you compare prices
- Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
- Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
- Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
Who owns this facility
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Limited Liability company
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Be Smarts Tr | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 05/14/2018 |
| Bfsnmc LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 05/14/2018 |
| Bles Healthcare Management LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 100% | 05/14/2018 |
| Borenstein, Phillip | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/14/2018 |
| Hamilton 3p LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 05/14/2018 |
| Hmsnmc LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 05/14/2018 |
| Lahasky Family Trust | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 05/14/2018 |
| Braunstein, Barry | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/14/2018 |
| Feuer, Samuel | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/14/2018 |
| Geary Property Holdings LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/14/2018 |
| GPH Rosemont LP | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/14/2018 |
| Katz, Larry | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/14/2018 |
| Leshkowitz, Eli | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/14/2018 |
| Lewis, Steven | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/14/2018 |
| Lewis, Steven | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/14/2018 |
| Lewis, Steven | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/14/2018 |
| Rosenstock, Yitzchok | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/17/2023 |
| Rosenstock, Yitzchok | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/16/2025 |
All 18 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.
Other facilities in the same chain
CMS lists this facility under the chain Lme Family Holdings — 15 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
- Valley Manor Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center — Coopersburg, PA · overall 2/5
- Wyndmoor Hills Rehabilitation and Nursing Center — Wyndmoor, PA · overall 1/5SFF
- Fairhaven Healthcare Center — Lowell, MA · overall 2/5
- Lafayette Rehabilitation & Skilled Nursing — Marblehead, MA · overall 5/5
- Cherry Hill for Nursing and Rehabilitation — Westland, MI · overall 4/5
- Monument Healthcare and Nursing Center — Scottsbluff, NE · overall 1/5
- Fairlane Gardens Nursing and Rehab at Reading — Reading, PA · overall 1/5
- Forest City Nursing and Rehab Center — Forest City, PA · overall 1/5
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 14 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
- "If someone reports suspected abuse or neglect here, what happens in the first 24 hours?"
- "How do you inspect and maintain essential equipment, and how quickly are repairs made?"
- "How do you handle room assignments and roommate requests, and do residents get advance written notice before any move?"
- "How do you protect residents' privacy, both in their medical records and in day-to-day care?"
- "Walk me through what happens when a resident or family files a grievance — who responds and how fast?"
- "Who is on the team that builds each resident's care plan, and how quickly is it in place after admission?"
- "Can you tell me what this citation involved and what steps you took to bring care back up to standard?"
Also worth asking anywhere
- "Your weekend nurse staffing is reported below the Pennsylvania midpoint — how does the weekend schedule differ from a weekday?"
- "Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
- "CMS reports 56% total nursing staff turnover here — who on the care team has been with you longest?"
- "The ownership record on file lists 18 owning or managing parties — who makes the decisions about staffing levels?"
- "Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"
Nearby facilities (12 closest of 165 within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bryn Mawr Extended Care Center | 0.9 mi | Bryn Mawr, PA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Beaumont at Bryn Mawr | 1.0 mi | Bryn Mawr, PA | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Bryn Mawr Village | 1.1 mi | Bryn Mawr, PA | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Quadrangle | 2.1 mi | Haverford, PA | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Waverly Heights | 2.9 mi | Gladwyne, PA | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Rosewood Gardens Rehabilitation and Nursing Center | 3.3 mi | Broomall, PA | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Broomall Manor | 3.5 mi | Broomall, PA | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Wayne Center | 3.6 mi | Wayne, PA | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Pine View Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center | 3.6 mi | Broomall, PA | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Westgate Hills Rehabilitation and Nursing Ctr | 3.7 mi | Havertown, PA | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Saunders Nursing and Rehabilitation Center | 4.4 mi | Wynnewood, PA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
| William Hood Dunwoody Care Ctr | 4.6 mi | Newtown Square, PA | ★★★★★ | 5/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
Other facilities in the same county
CMS records place this facility in Delaware, PA — 28 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
- Springfield Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center — Springfield, PA · overall 2/5
- St Francis Center for Rehabilitation & Healthcare — Darby, PA · overall 1/5
- Sterling Health Care and Rehab Center — Media, PA · overall 2/5abuse
- Wallingford Skilled Nursing and Rehabilitation Cen — Wallingford, PA · overall 1/5
- Wesley Enhanced Living Main Line Rehab and SKD Nsg — Media, PA · overall 4/5
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 395193.
This page is the printable visit checklist. If your browser did not open the print dialog automatically, use File → Print (Ctrl/⌘-P).