Kentucky ›Covington

Rosedale Green

Costs & paymentPlan a visit

4250 Glenn Avenue, Covington, KY 41015 (opens Google Maps) · Kenton County · (859) 431-2244· 176 certified beds · avg 169 residents/day · certified since Mar 1, 1991 · Medicare and Medicaid certified

Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →

5/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
inspected Jun 4, 2026
2
Serious findings on record
most recent Oct 11, 2019
$0
Fines, last 3 years
3.62
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

New to these records? How to read an inspection report →

Health inspection rating: ★★★★★5/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5 · how star ratings work →

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Actual harm, isolated · Oct 11, 2019 · F-0656

The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.

Why it matters: Without a complete, working care plan, important needs can slip through the cracks and no one is accountable for results.

Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.

Corrected: Nov 14, 2019 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, isolated · Oct 11, 2019 · F-0689

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.

Corrected: Nov 14, 2019 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

Inspection findings in the public record

Showing the latest 3 of 7 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.

  1. E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern

    The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. F-0880

  2. G · Actual harm, isolated

    The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. F-0656

  3. G · Actual harm, isolated

    The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. F-0689

View all 7 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Apr 17, 2025E · Potential for more than minimal harm, patternThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880
Oct 11, 2019▲ G · Actual harm, isolatedThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656
Oct 11, 2019▲ G · Actual harm, isolatedThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689
Oct 11, 2019D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups. · F-0558
Oct 11, 2019D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not enter each resident's assessment information into the required format and send it to the state within 7 days of completing the assessment, as the rules require. · F-0640
Oct 11, 2019D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not have a policy covering how food brought in by family and visitors is used and stored safely. · F-0813
Oct 11, 2019D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not keep its building and grounds safe, functional, clean, and comfortable for residents, staff, and visitors. · F-0921

Inspection trend by year

Citations by recorded inspection yearPublished citation counts, not a quality score · Source: CMS, 2026-08-01
All citationsSerious citations (G–L)
2019
All citations: 6
Serious citations (G–L): 2
2025
All citations: 1
Serious citations (G–L): 0

All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
201962G ▲
202510E

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

How to file a complaint about care →

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

What these staffing numbers mean →

Nurse time, in contextAdjusted hours per resident per day · Source: CMS, 2026-08-01
This facilityKentucky averageU.S. average
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)
This facility: 3.62
Kentucky average: 3.71
U.S. average: 3.95
Registered Nurse hours
This facility: 0.26
Kentucky average: 0.74
U.S. average: 0.69
Weekend total nurse staffing
This facility: 3.19
Kentucky average: 3.27
U.S. average: 3.50

All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.

MeasureThis facilityKentucky avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.623.713.95top 39% in Kentucky; bottom 43% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.260.740.69bottom 1% in Kentucky; bottom 6% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.193.273.50top 36% in Kentucky; bottom 41% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.120.530.48bottom 1% in Kentucky; bottom 3% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)43.546.445.8top 45% in Kentucky; top 46% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)30.041.842.9top 27% in Kentucky; top 29% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.52, RN 0.25, weekend 3.09.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.52 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 2/5.

Quality measures: assessments & claims

Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.

Quality measures rating: 1/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: 1/5

Costs & payment

Price evidence · separate from quality

No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Rosedale Green. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.

Calculate a stay from a quote you receive

Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.

Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.

Before you compare prices

  • Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
  • Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
  • Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.

Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price

Who owns this facility

How to read ownership records →

Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →

Non profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Boyer, DavidIndividualW-2 Managing EmployeeNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2019
Fritz, EdwardIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE04/11/2006
Fritz, EdwardIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2011
Halderman, BonnieIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE05/22/1990
Halderman, BonnieIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2011
Hemmer, MichaelIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE03/31/2007
Hemmer, MichaelIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2013
Knollman, LondaIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE08/16/2004
Knollman, LondaIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE08/16/2004
Middendorf, MarkIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE05/08/1990
Neuhaus, JeromeIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE06/12/2007
Sewell, JeffreyIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2010
Simmons, KellyIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE09/27/2011
Weaver, PaulIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE05/12/1992
Weaver, PaulIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2011
Wolnitzek, StephenIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2013
Ziegler, NormanIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2002
Ziegler, NormanIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2011

All 18 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.

Questions to ask on your visit

Full visit checklist →

Print visit checklist

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

  • "Can you show me an example care plan, and how are families included when it's created and updated?"
  • "What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
  • "Who leads your infection prevention program, and how do you make sure staff follow practices like hand hygiene every day?"
  • "Can you give me examples of how you adjust daily routines and room setups to fit each resident's preferences?"
  • "How do you make sure resident assessments are completed and submitted to the state on time?"
  • "What are your rules for bringing in my family member's favorite foods, and how are they stored?"
  • "Can we tour the whole building today, including resident bathrooms and common areas, not just the lobby?"

Also worth asking anywhere

  • "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
  • "Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
  • "CMS reports 44% total nursing staff turnover here — who on the care team has been with you longest?"
  • "The ownership record on file lists 18 owning or managing parties — who makes the decisions about staffing levels?"
  • "Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"

Nearby facilities (12 closest of 97 within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
The Pavilion at Kenton1.8 miCovington, KY★☆☆☆☆1/5
Highlandspring of Ft Thomas2.7 miFort Thomas, KY★★★☆☆3/5
St Elizabeth Ft Thomas SNF3.0 miFort Thomas, KY★★★★☆5/5
Carmel Manor3.4 miFort Thomas, KY★☆☆☆☆1/5
St Elizabeth Edgewood SNF4.4 miEdgewood, KY★★★★★4/5
Coldspring Transitional Care Center4.6 miCold Spring, KY★★☆☆☆2/5
Madonna Manor5.0 miVilla Hills, KY★☆☆☆☆1/5
Village Care Center5.3 miErlanger, KY★★★★☆4/5
Brookside Healthcare Center5.6 miCincinnati, OH★★★★★4/5
Residence at Salem Woods6.1 miCincinnati, OH★★★★★5/5
Lincoln Crawford Care Center6.3 miCincinnati, OH★★★☆☆2/5abuse
Carecore at Margaret Hall6.4 miCincinnati, OH★★☆☆☆1/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

Other facilities in the same county

CMS records place this facility in Kenton, KY — 8 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.

Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.

All facilities in Covington →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 185225.

This page is the printable visit checklist. If your browser did not open the print dialog automatically, use File → Print (Ctrl/⌘-P).

Your research

Viewed & saved homes

Kept in this browser tab for this session. Choose to remember them only on a device you trust. Opening a record or comparison sends its usual page request.

Selected for comparison

Recently viewed

Prices entered in a cost worksheet stay on that page and are not saved. Privacy details