ArkansasRogers

Rogers Health and Rehabilitation Center

1149 W New Hope Rd, Rogers, AR 72758 · Benton County · 118 certified beds · avg 61 residents/day · certified since Jun 1, 1982

Part of chain: SOUTHERN ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES (35 facilities, chain avg rating 3.8★)

2/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
4.94
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

All citations in the current public record (24)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Jan 24, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Jan 24, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Dec 1, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care.
Dec 1, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not keep residents' personal and medical information private and confidential.
Dec 1, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs.
Dec 1, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
Dec 1, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint
Dec 1, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Dec 1, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have enough nursing staff each day to meet every resident's needs, or did not have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift. Adequate staffing is one of the strongest predictors of good care. · from a complaint
Dec 1, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not make sure its nurse aides were properly trained — aides working more than 4 months must be trained and competent, and newer aides must be enrolled in training. · from a complaint
Dec 1, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication.
Dec 1, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have a written plan describing how it runs its quality improvement program — the ongoing process of finding problems in care and fixing them.
Dec 1, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not designate a qualified infection preventionist — a trained person responsible for running the infection prevention and control program. · from a complaint
Dec 1, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have a working call system — the button or cord residents use to summon help — in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
Dec 1, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not keep its building and grounds safe, functional, clean, and comfortable for residents, staff, and visitors.
Dec 1, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Sep 25, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint
Sep 25, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Sep 25, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep its building and grounds safe, functional, clean, and comfortable for residents, staff, and visitors. · from a complaint
Sep 2, 2022F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Sep 2, 2022E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.
Sep 2, 2022E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
Sep 2, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups.
Sep 2, 2022C · Minimal risk, facility-wideThe facility has more than 120 beds but did not hire a qualified full-time social worker as required.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (14 → 2).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202250F
2023170E
202520E

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityArkansas avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)4.944.713.95top 28% in Arkansas; top 14% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.390.480.69bottom 33% in Arkansas; bottom 20% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing4.234.043.50top 27% in Arkansas; top 17% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.200.280.48bottom 29% in Arkansas; bottom 12% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)48.649.545.8bottom 49% in Arkansas; bottom 40% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)16.744.842.9top 10% in Arkansas; top 9% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.13, RN 0.32, weekend 3.54. Staffing rating: 4/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: —/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Limited Liability company

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
4p2t1 Ops Holding LPOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%12/14/2020
Alexark1 LLCOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest01/01/2022
Jej Assets LPOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest01/01/2022
Jej Management, LLCOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest01/01/2022
Ponthie, SharlotIndividual5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest01/01/2022
Alexark1 LLCOrganizationGeneral Partnership InterestNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2022
Hyatt, KathyIndividualW-2 Managing EmployeeNOT APPLICABLE08/16/2023
Jej Assets LPOrganizationLimited Partnership InterestNOT APPLICABLE12/14/2020
Ponthie, JohnIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2022
Ponthie, JohnIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE08/15/2022

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
The Blossoms at Rogers Rehab & Nursing Center0.9 miRogers, AR★★★★★4/5
Innisfree Health and Rehab, LLC1.8 miRogers, AR★★☆☆☆1/5
Hampton Place Healthcare, LLC1.9 miRogers, AR★★★★★5/5
Jamestown Nursing and Rehab, LLC1.9 miRogers, AR★☆☆☆☆1/5
Promenade Health and Rehabilitation2.7 miRogers, AR★★★★☆4/5
Ashley Rehabilitation and Health Care Center3.2 miRogers, AR—/5SFF
Bradford House Nursing and Rehab, LLC4.4 miBentonville, AR★★★☆☆3/5
The Green House Cottages of Northwest Arkansas5.8 miBentonville, AR★★★★★5/5
Shiloh Nursing and Rehab, LLC6.3 miSpringdale, AR★★★★★4/5
Windcrest Health and Rehab INC7.3 miSpringdale, AR★★★☆☆2/5
Springdale Health and Rehabilitation Center8.9 miSpringdale, AR★★☆☆☆2/5
Westwood Health and Rehab, INC9.3 miSpringdale, AR★★☆☆☆1/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Rogers →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 045070.