ArkansasParagould

The Green House Cottages of Belle Meade

2200 Chateau Boulevard, Paragould, AR 72450 · Greene County · 167 certified beds · avg 127 residents/day · certified since Sep 9, 1991

Part of chain: SOUTHERN ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES (35 facilities, chain avg rating 3.8★)

2/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
1
Serious findings on record
$13,870
Fines, last 3 years
5.55
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Dec 19, 2024 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.

Corrected: Jan 10, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (21)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Aug 1, 2025F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Aug 1, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility gave residents unnecessary mind-altering (psychotropic) medications, or used drugs in a way that restrained residents by dulling their ability to think, move, or function.
Aug 1, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Dec 19, 2024▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Apr 25, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide activities that meet residents' needs and interests. Nursing homes must offer meaningful activity programs, not just leave residents idle.
Apr 25, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Apr 25, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
Apr 25, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not prepare and serve food in a form that meets each resident's individual needs — for example, chopped, pureed, or softened food for residents with chewing or swallowing problems.
Feb 3, 2023F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Feb 3, 2023F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not have a written plan describing how it runs its quality improvement program — the ongoing process of finding problems in care and fixing them.
Feb 3, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.
Feb 3, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Feb 3, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Feb 3, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Feb 3, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility's menus did not meet residents' nutritional needs, or were not prepared in advance, followed as written, kept up to date, or reviewed by a dietician.
Feb 3, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not serve food and drinks that were appetizing, attractive, and at a safe and pleasant temperature.
Feb 3, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not prepare and serve food in a form that meets each resident's individual needs — for example, chopped, pureed, or softened food for residents with chewing or swallowing problems.
Feb 3, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Feb 3, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not fully assess residents on time — a complete assessment of health, abilities, and needs is required when a resident is first admitted and at least once every 12 months after that.
Feb 3, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not educate residents and staff about COVID-19 vaccination, offer the vaccine to those eligible after that education, or properly document everyone's vaccination status.
Feb 3, 2023C · Minimal risk, facility-wideThe facility did not make sure its staff were vaccinated for COVID-19 in accordance with the federal requirements in effect at the time.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (4 → 3).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
2023130F
202451J ▲
202530F

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

1 fine totaling $13,870.

DateTypeAmount / length
Dec 19, 2024Fine$13,870

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityArkansas avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)5.554.713.95top 12% in Arkansas; top 7% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.430.480.69bottom 44% in Arkansas; bottom 27% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing4.904.043.50top 11% in Arkansas; top 7% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.170.280.48bottom 21% in Arkansas; bottom 8% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)45.249.545.8top 37% in Arkansas; bottom 49% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)33.344.842.9top 30% in Arkansas; top 33% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 5.08, RN 0.39, weekend 4.49. Staffing rating: 4/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Partnership

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
4p2t1 Ops Holding LPOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%03/01/2019
Alexark1 LLCOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest01/01/2022
Jej Assets LPOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest01/01/2022
Jej Management, LLCOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest01/01/2022
Ponthie, SharlotIndividual5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest01/01/2022
Alexark1 LLCOrganizationGeneral Partnership InterestNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2022
Hartley, MattIndividualW-2 Managing EmployeeNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2024
Jej Assets LPOrganizationLimited Partnership InterestNOT APPLICABLE03/01/2019
Ponthie, JohnIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2022

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Greene Acres Nursing Home2.0 miParagould, AR★★★★☆4/5
Monette Manor, LLC13.5 miMonette, AR★☆☆☆☆1/5
Ridgecrest Health and Rehabilitation13.7 miJonesboro, AR★☆☆☆☆1/5
Lakeside Health and Rehab16.1 miLake City, AR★★☆☆☆2/5
St. Elizabeth's Place18.0 miJonesboro, AR★★☆☆☆2/5
The Springs Jonesboro19.0 miJonesboro, AR★★★★☆4/5
Rector Nursing and Rehab19.6 miRector, AR★★★★★5/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Paragould →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 045170.