MinnesotaZumbrota

Zumbrota Care Center

433 Mill Street, Zumbrota, MN 55992 · Goodhue County · 42 certified beds · avg 34 residents/day · certified since Dec 1, 1986

Part of chain: ST. FRANCIS HEALTH SERVICES (14 facilities, chain avg rating 2.8★)

2/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
1
Serious findings on record
$28,321
Fines, last 3 years
4.62
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · May 27, 2025 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.

Corrected: Jun 30, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (24)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Dec 2, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Nov 26, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Nov 26, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections. · from a complaint
Aug 7, 2025F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · from a complaint
Aug 7, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not give residents proper notice about what Medicare or Medicaid covers, or about charges the resident might owe for services that aren't covered.
Aug 7, 2025C · Minimal risk, facility-wideThe facility did not provide required paperwork or notices about a resident's needs, their right to appeal a transfer or discharge, or the facility's bed-hold policy (how long a bed is saved during a hospital stay).
May 27, 2025▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
May 27, 2025F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility was not properly licensed, or did not operate in compliance with federal, state, and local laws, regulations, and accepted professional standards. · from a complaint
May 27, 2025F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not conduct and document a facility-wide assessment of what staff, supplies, and resources it needs to care for its residents properly — during everyday operations, nights, weekends, and emergencies. · from a complaint
May 27, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint
May 27, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · from a complaint
May 27, 2025C · Minimal risk, facility-wideThe facility did not post its nurse staffing information every day. Nursing homes must publicly display how many nurses and aides are on duty each day. · from a complaint
May 27, 2025C · Minimal risk, facility-wideThe facility did not electronically submit complete and accurate staffing information to the government, based on payroll and other verifiable records. · from a complaint
May 30, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not employ enough qualified food and nutrition staff, including a qualified dietician, to properly run its food service.
May 30, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not electronically submit complete and accurate staffing information to the government, based on payroll and other verifiable records.
Aug 10, 2023F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Aug 10, 2023F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility was not managed in a way that uses its money, staff, and resources effectively and efficiently to care for residents.
Aug 10, 2023F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not have a written plan describing how it runs its quality improvement program — the ongoing process of finding problems in care and fixing them.
Aug 10, 2023F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not run an ongoing quality assurance committee that reviews care problems and creates plans to fix them.
Aug 10, 2023F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Aug 10, 2023F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not keep all essential equipment working safely — things like heating and cooling systems, kitchen equipment, and medical devices.
Aug 10, 2023F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not have firmly secured handrails on both sides of its hallways.
Aug 10, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility's menus did not meet residents' nutritional needs, or were not prepared in advance, followed as written, kept up to date, or reviewed by a dietician. · from a complaint
Aug 10, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures for offering residents flu and pneumonia vaccinations.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (2 → 3).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202390F
202420F
2025131J ▲

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

1 fine totaling $28,321, plus 1 Medicare payment denial period.

DateTypeAmount / length
May 27, 2025Fine$28,321
May 27, 2025Payment Denial367 days from Jun 25, 2025

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityMinnesota avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)4.624.833.95bottom 43% in Minnesota; top 20% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours1.871.220.69top 7% in Minnesota; top 2% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.954.273.50bottom 37% in Minnesota; top 24% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.990.690.48top 17% in Minnesota; top 6% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)40.542.245.8bottom 48% in Minnesota; top 38% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)11.138.642.9top 5% in Minnesota; top 4% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.66, RN 1.48, weekend 3.13. Staffing rating: 5/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 3/5 · short-stay residents: 4/5

Who owns this facility

Non profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Bach, CurtisIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE08/28/2024
Bach, CurtisIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE08/28/2024
Bach, CurtisIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE08/28/2024
Big Stone Therapies, INCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE02/03/2015
Big Stone Therapies, INCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE10/23/2025
Boesen, LaceyIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE05/07/2024
Caspers, MeganIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE12/29/2014
Caspers, MeganIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE12/29/2014
Decker, ChadIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2016
Decker, ChadIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2016
Decker, ChadIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2016
Decker, ChadIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/09/2025
Dripps, DanielIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2016
Ehlers, DouglasIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2023
Ehlers, DouglasIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2023
Ehlers, DouglasIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2023
Ehlers, DouglasIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2023
Eide Bailly LLPOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/03/2023
Eide Bailly LLPOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE10/23/2025
Erickson-Linnell, AmeliaIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE04/28/2025

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Edenbrook Pine Haven6.1 miPine Island, MN★★☆☆☆3/5
Rochester Rehabilitation and Living Center17.2 miRochester, MN★☆☆☆☆1/5
Madonna Towers of Rochester18.1 miRochester, MN★★★☆☆3/5
St Crispin Living Community18.2 miRed Wing, MN★★★★☆3/5
Edenbrook Rochester West19.2 miRochester, MN★★☆☆☆1/5
Edenbrook of Rochester19.4 miRochester, MN★★☆☆☆2/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Zumbrota →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 245376.