MinnesotaRochester

Samaritan Bethany Home on Eighth

24 8th Street Northwest, Rochester, MN 55901 · Olmsted County · 128 certified beds · avg 94 residents/day · certified since May 1, 1988

3/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
1
Serious findings on record
$27,555
Fines, last 3 years
4.11
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Mar 14, 2024 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Apr 12, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (18)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Mar 26, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not make sure residents were fully informed about their own health, care, and treatments in a way they could understand.
Mar 26, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not allow residents to take their own medications when a clinical review showed they could do so safely. Residents have this right if their care team determines it's appropriate.
Mar 26, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs.
Mar 26, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility gave residents unnecessary mind-altering (psychotropic) medications, or used drugs in a way that restrained residents by dulling their ability to think, move, or function.
Mar 26, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Mar 26, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make sure its nurses and nurse aides had the skills and training needed to properly care for every resident.
Mar 26, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Mar 26, 2026C · Minimal risk, facility-wideThe facility did not post its nurse staffing information every day. Nursing homes must publicly display how many nurses and aides are on duty each day. · from a complaint
Dec 12, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups.
Mar 14, 2024▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Mar 14, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · from a complaint
Feb 1, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Feb 1, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not allow residents to take their own medications when a clinical review showed they could do so safely. Residents have this right if their care team determines it's appropriate.
Feb 1, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
Feb 1, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.
Feb 1, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections.
Feb 1, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide timely, quality laboratory tests to meet residents' needs.
Feb 1, 2024C · Minimal risk, facility-wideThe facility did not make its inspection results easy for residents to see, or made it hard for residents to contact advocacy agencies like the ombudsman.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (1 → 8).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
2024101G ▲
202680E

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

1 fine totaling $27,555, plus 1 Medicare payment denial period.

DateTypeAmount / length
Mar 14, 2024Fine$27,555
Mar 14, 2024Payment Denial3 days from Apr 9, 2024

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityMinnesota avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)4.114.833.95bottom 20% in Minnesota; top 35% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.721.220.69bottom 8% in Minnesota; top 34% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.414.273.50bottom 9% in Minnesota; top 47% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.200.690.48bottom 1% in Minnesota; bottom 12% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)47.442.245.8bottom 33% in Minnesota; bottom 43% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)25.038.642.9top 27% in Minnesota; top 20% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.53, RN 0.62, weekend 2.92. Staffing rating: 4/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: 3/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5

Who owns this facility

Non profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Bakken, KirbyIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE04/27/2020
Bakken, KirbyIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE04/27/2020
Beaulieu, RobertIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE04/27/2020
Beaulieu, RobertIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE04/27/2020
Berg, KylaIndividualW-2 Managing EmployeeNOT APPLICABLE03/26/2012
Bird, TerryIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE07/24/2017
Bird, TerryIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE07/24/2017
Davis, ScottIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE04/28/2014
Davis, ScottIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE04/28/2014
Deyoung, LaurieIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE08/28/2017
Deyoung, LaurieIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE08/28/2017
Dunn, RachelIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE04/25/2016
Dunn, RachelIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE04/25/2016
Faudi, JeradIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE04/26/2021
Faudi, JeradIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE04/26/2021
Hartman, KarenIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE04/27/2020
Hartman, KarenIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE04/27/2020
Haug, JohnIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE04/26/2021
Haug, JohnIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE04/26/2021
Knutson, SusanIndividualW-2 Managing EmployeeNOT APPLICABLE03/17/2008

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Charter House INC0.4 miRochester, MN★★★★★4/5
Rochester Restorative Care Center1.1 miRochester, MN★☆☆☆☆1/5
Edenbrook of Rochester1.7 miRochester, MN★★☆☆☆2/5
Edenbrook Rochester West1.8 miRochester, MN★★☆☆☆1/5
Madonna Towers of Rochester2.7 miRochester, MN★★★☆☆3/5
Rochester Rehabilitation and Living Center3.7 miRochester, MN★☆☆☆☆1/5
Stewartville Care Center12.1 miStewartville, MN★☆☆☆☆2/5abuse
Edenbrook Pine Haven15.2 miPine Island, MN★★☆☆☆3/5
The Green Prairie Rehabilitation Center17.0 miPlainview, MN★★★★★4/5
Chosen Valley Care Center19.4 miChatfield, MN★★★★★5/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Rochester →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 245530.