How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
12111 Hinson Road, Little Rock, AR 72212 (opens Google Maps) · Pulaski County · (501) 225-8888· 97 certified beds · avg 77 residents/day · certified since Sep 29, 2003 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: SOUTHERN ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES (35 facilities, chain avg rating 3.8★)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Showing the latest 3 of 15 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication. F-0760
The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. F-0812
The facility did not make its inspection results easy for residents to see, or made it hard for residents to contact advocacy agencies like the ombudsman. F-0577
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 24, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication. · F-0760 |
| Feb 8, 2024 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Feb 8, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not make its inspection results easy for residents to see, or made it hard for residents to contact advocacy agencies like the ombudsman. · F-0577 |
| Feb 8, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · F-0584 |
| Feb 8, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not keep residents' medications free from unnecessary drugs. Residents should only take medicines they truly need, at the right dose, for a clear reason. · F-0757 |
| Feb 8, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not prepare and serve food in a form that meets each resident's individual needs — for example, chopped, pureed, or softened food for residents with chewing or swallowing problems. · F-0805 |
| Feb 8, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Feb 8, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not keep its building and grounds safe, functional, clean, and comfortable for residents, staff, and visitors. · F-0921 |
| Feb 8, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| Sep 12, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint · F-0609 |
| Nov 4, 2022 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Nov 4, 2022 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689 |
| Nov 4, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures for offering residents flu and pneumonia vaccinations. · F-0883 |
| Nov 4, 2022 | B · Potential for minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · F-0641 |
| Nov 4, 2022 | B · Potential for minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not coordinate resident assessments with the state's pre-admission screening program for mental illness and intellectual disabilities, or failed to refer residents for the special services they need. · F-0644 |
Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (8 → 1).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 5 | 0 | F |
| 2023 | 1 | 0 | D |
| 2024 | 8 | 0 | F |
| 2025 | 1 | 0 | D |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Arkansas avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 4.44 | 4.71 | 3.95 | bottom 41% in Arkansas; top 25% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.51 | 0.48 | 0.69 | top 32% in Arkansas; bottom 39% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 3.75 | 4.04 | 3.50 | bottom 36% in Arkansas; top 31% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.27 | 0.28 | 0.48 | top 44% in Arkansas; bottom 26% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 54.5 | 49.5 | 45.8 | bottom 31% in Arkansas; bottom 26% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 70.0 | 44.8 | 42.9 | bottom 16% in Arkansas; bottom 12% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.04, RN 0.46, weekend 3.41.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (4.04 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 3/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 4/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Pleasant Valley Rehabilitation and Nursing. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Limited Liability company
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4p2t1 Ops Holding LP | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 100% | 01/14/2022 |
| Jej Assets LP | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 06/14/2022 |
| Ponthie, Sharlot | Individual | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 08/15/2022 |
| Alexark1 LLC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/14/2022 |
| Jej Management, LLC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/14/2022 |
| Nichols, Courtney | Individual | W-2 Managing Employee | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/15/2022 |
| Ponthie, John | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/15/2022 |
All 7 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.
CMS lists this facility under the chain Southern Administrative Services — 35 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 34 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Blossoms at Breckenridge Rehab & Nursing Cente | 2.2 mi | Little Rock, AR | ★☆☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Presbyterian Village, INC | 2.3 mi | Little Rock, AR | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Hickory Heights Health and Rehab, LLC | 2.5 mi | Little Rock, AR | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| The Springs of Chenal | 3.1 mi | Little Rock, AR | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| The Blossoms at Woodland Hills Rehab & Nursing Cen | 3.2 mi | Little Rock, AR | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
| Nursing and Rehabilitation Center at Good Shepherd | 3.3 mi | Little Rock, AR | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| The Green House Cottages of Poplar Grove | 3.4 mi | Little Rock, AR | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| The Springs of Barrow | 3.5 mi | Little Rock, AR | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Briarwood Nursing and Rehabilitation Center, INC | 3.8 mi | Little Rock, AR | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| The Blossoms at Midtown Rehab & Nursing Center | 4.2 mi | Little Rock, AR | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Colonel Glenn Health and Rehab, LLC | 4.5 mi | Little Rock, AR | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| The Springs of Pinnacle Mountain | 4.7 mi | Little Rock, AR | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
CMS records place this facility in Pulaski, AR — 23 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 045390.
This page is the printable visit checklist. If your browser did not open the print dialog automatically, use File → Print (Ctrl/⌘-P).
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details