ArkansasNorth Little Rock

The Blossoms at North Little Rock Rehab & Nursing

2501 John Ashley Drive, North Little Rock, AR 72114 · Pulaski County · 140 certified beds · avg 102 residents/day · certified since Jul 16, 2003

Part of chain: THE BLOSSOMS REHAB & NURSING CENTER (23 facilities, chain avg rating 2.6★)

3/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
4.39
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

All citations in the current public record (16)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
May 14, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication. · from a complaint
Apr 24, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Apr 24, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Mar 28, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Mar 28, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not prepare and serve food in a form that meets each resident's individual needs — for example, chopped, pureed, or softened food for residents with chewing or swallowing problems.
Mar 28, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
Mar 28, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · from a complaint
Feb 24, 2023F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Feb 24, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs.
Feb 24, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
Feb 24, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not keep all essential equipment working safely — things like heating and cooling systems, kitchen equipment, and medical devices.
Feb 24, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' right to make their own choices about their daily lives, such as when to wake up, what to eat, or how to spend their time.
Feb 24, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not create and follow a basic care plan covering a new resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of admission. The first days are when a new resident is most vulnerable.
Feb 24, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Feb 24, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections.
Feb 24, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not run an ongoing quality assurance committee that reviews care problems and creates plans to fix them.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (3 → 2).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202390F
202440F
202520E
202610D

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityArkansas avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)4.394.713.95bottom 38% in Arkansas; top 26% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.470.480.69top 42% in Arkansas; bottom 34% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.804.043.50bottom 38% in Arkansas; top 29% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.250.280.48top 50% in Arkansas; bottom 22% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)49.049.545.8bottom 46% in Arkansas; bottom 39% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)33.344.842.9top 30% in Arkansas; top 33% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.43, RN 0.37, weekend 2.98. Staffing rating: 4/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Limited Liability company

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Herzka, MatisyohuIndividual5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest01/01/2023
MH Ar Opco LLCOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest01/01/2023
Pine Tree Holding LLCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%04/05/2021
Dughetti, CynthiaIndividualW-2 Managing EmployeeNOT APPLICABLE04/05/2021
Scheinbaum, ShlomoIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE04/05/2021

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Arkansas State Veterans Home at North Little Rock0.0 miNorth Little Rock, AR★★★★★4/5
Robinson Nursing and Rehabilitation Center LLC2.7 miNorth Little Rock, AR★★☆☆☆2/5
Lakewood Health and Rehab, LLC3.1 miNorth Little Rock, AR★★★★☆4/5
The Blossoms at Cumberland Rehab & Nursing Center3.3 miLittle Rock, AR★☆☆☆☆1/5abuse
The Blossoms at Midtown Rehab & Nursing Center3.3 miLittle Rock, AR★☆☆☆☆1/5
Briarwood Nursing and Rehabilitation Center, INC3.7 miLittle Rock, AR★★★☆☆3/5
Premier at the Springs4.4 miNorth Little Rock, AR★☆☆☆☆1/5
The Green House Cottages of Poplar Grove4.8 miLittle Rock, AR★★★★☆3/5
The Blossoms at Breckenridge Rehab & Nursing Cente4.9 miLittle Rock, AR★☆☆☆☆2/5
The Blossoms at Woodland Hills Rehab & Nursing Cen4.9 miLittle Rock, AR★☆☆☆☆1/5abuse
Presbyterian Village, INC5.0 miLittle Rock, AR★★★★★5/5
The Springs of Barrow5.8 miLittle Rock, AR★★★★☆3/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in North Little Rock →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 045385.