How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
Oakpark Health and Rehabilitation Center
2851 Tampa Rd, Palm Harbor, FL 34684 (opens Google Maps) · Pinellas County · (727) 787-4777· 180 certified beds · avg 169 residents/day · certified since Dec 1, 1990 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: ASTON HEALTH (38 facilities, chain avg rating 2.7★)
2/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
inspected Dec 11, 2025
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
3.51
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)
Every record stays on this page.
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Inspection findings in the public record
Showing the latest 3 of 23 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not provide appropriate treatment and services to residents with a mental health condition, difficulty adjusting emotionally, or a history of trauma or post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). · from a complaint F-0742
The facility did not electronically submit complete and accurate staffing information to the government, based on payroll and other verifiable records. · from a complaint F-0851
The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. F-0686
View all 23 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 12, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide appropriate treatment and services to residents with a mental health condition, difficulty adjusting emotionally, or a history of trauma or post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). · from a complaint · F-0742 |
| Dec 11, 2025 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not electronically submit complete and accurate staffing information to the government, based on payroll and other verifiable records. · from a complaint · F-0851 |
| Dec 11, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · F-0686 |
| Dec 11, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint · F-0689 |
| Dec 11, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have enough nursing staff each day to meet every resident's needs, or did not have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift. Adequate staffing is one of the strongest predictors of good care. · F-0725 |
| Dec 11, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Dec 11, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not keep all essential equipment working safely — things like heating and cooling systems, kitchen equipment, and medical devices. · F-0908 |
| Dec 11, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not treat residents with respect and dignity, or did not let them keep and use their own personal belongings. · F-0557 |
| Dec 11, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away. · F-0580 |
| Dec 11, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · F-0609 |
| Dec 11, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not properly complete the required screening (called PASARR) that identifies whether a person entering a nursing home has a mental illness or intellectual disability and needs specialized services. · F-0645 |
| Dec 11, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · F-0677 |
| Dec 11, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · F-0684 |
| Aug 2, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have enough nursing staff each day to meet every resident's needs, or did not have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift. Adequate staffing is one of the strongest predictors of good care. · F-0725 |
| Aug 2, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not coordinate resident assessments with the state's pre-admission screening program for mental illness and intellectual disabilities, or failed to refer residents for the special services they need. · F-0644 |
| Aug 2, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility allowed residents to lose the ability to do daily activities — like bathing, dressing, and eating — when there was no medical reason for the decline. Good care helps residents keep the abilities they have. · F-0676 |
| Aug 2, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits. · F-0758 |
| Aug 2, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time. · F-0759 |
| Aug 13, 2021 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Aug 13, 2021 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| Aug 13, 2021 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time. · F-0759 |
| Aug 13, 2021 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| Aug 13, 2021 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide each resident with a nourishing, tasty, well-balanced diet that meets their daily nutritional and special dietary needs. · F-0800 |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (5 → 12).
All citationsSerious citations (G–L)
2021
All citations: 5
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2023
All citations: 5
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2025
All citations: 12
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2026
All citations: 1
Serious citations (G–L): 0
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 5 | 0 | E |
| 2023 | 5 | 0 | E |
| 2025 | 12 | 0 | F |
| 2026 | 1 | 0 | D |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
What these staffing numbers mean →
This facilityFlorida averageU.S. average
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)
This facility: 3.51
Florida average: 4.03
U.S. average: 3.95
Registered Nurse hours
This facility: 0.59
Florida average: 0.76
U.S. average: 0.69
Weekend total nurse staffing
This facility: 3.26
Florida average: 3.68
U.S. average: 3.50
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Florida avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.51 | 4.03 | 3.95 | bottom 17% in Florida; bottom 37% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.59 | 0.76 | 0.69 | bottom 39% in Florida; top 49% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 3.26 | 3.68 | 3.50 | bottom 18% in Florida; bottom 45% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.47 | 0.53 | 0.48 | top 46% in Florida; top 37% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 55.8 | 41.4 | 45.8 | bottom 16% in Florida; bottom 23% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 65.7 | 46.0 | 42.9 | bottom 16% in Florida; bottom 15% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.41, RN 0.58, weekend 3.16.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.41 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 3/5.
Quality measures: assessments & claims
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5
Costs & payment
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Oakpark Health and Rehabilitation Center. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Calculate a stay from a quote you receive
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Before you compare prices
- Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
- Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
- Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
Who owns this facility
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Limited Liability company
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BP Oakpark Trust | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 50% | 05/05/2023 |
| LF Oakpark Trust | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 50% | 05/05/2023 |
| Oakpark Rehab Holdings LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 100% | 01/04/2023 |
| Aston Healthcare LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/05/2023 |
| Berard, Lori | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/06/2024 |
| Dilella, Vincent | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/06/2023 |
| Dilella, Vincent | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/18/2025 |
| Ferrone, Karen | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/02/2024 |
| Reynard-Suriano, Su | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/05/2023 |
| Reynard-Suriano, Su | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/09/2025 |
| Wildes, Donna | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/28/2025 |
| Wildes, Donna | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/28/2025 |
| Wildes, Donna | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/28/2025 |
All 13 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.
Other facilities in the same chain
CMS lists this facility under the chain Aston Health — 38 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
- Osprey Point Nursing Center — Bushnell, FL · overall 5/5
- Parkside Health and Rehabilitation Center — Deland, FL · overall 4/5
- Pensacola Nursing & Rehabilitation Center — Pensacola, FL · overall 2/5
- Riverwood Center — Jacksonville, FL · overall 2/5
- Ruleme Center — Eustis, FL · overall 4/5
- Sandgate Gardens Rehab and Nursing Center — Fort Pierce, FL · overall 2/5
- Sea Breeze Rehab and Nursing Center — Vero Beach, FL · overall 2/5
- Seaside Health and Rehabilitation Center — Daytona Beach, FL · overall 4/5
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 37 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "What mental health services do you offer on-site, and how do you care for residents with depression, anxiety, or a history of trauma?"
- "How do your actual daily staffing levels compare to what's reported on Medicare's Care Compare website?"
- "How do you prevent bedsores for residents who can't move themselves, and how often are at-risk residents repositioned?"
- "What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
- "What is your nurse and aide staffing ratio on each shift, including nights and weekends?"
- "Who leads your infection prevention program, and how do you make sure staff follow practices like hand hygiene every day?"
- "How do you inspect and maintain essential equipment, and how quickly are repairs made?"
- "How do you train staff to treat residents with dignity, and how do you protect residents' personal belongings?"
Also worth asking anywhere
- "Your weekend nurse staffing is reported below the Florida midpoint — how does the weekend schedule differ from a weekday?"
- "Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
- "CMS reports 56% total nursing staff turnover here — who on the care team has been with you longest?"
- "The ownership record on file lists 13 owning or managing parties — who makes the decisions about staffing levels?"
- "Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"
Nearby facilities (12 closest of 78 within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| St Mark Village | 0.8 mi | Palm Harbor, FL | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Aviata at Countryside | 1.3 mi | Palm Harbor, FL | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Aviata at the Palms | 1.4 mi | Palm Harbor, FL | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
| Palm Garden of Clearwater | 1.9 mi | Clearwater, FL | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Westchester Gardens Health & Rehabilitation | 2.3 mi | Clearwater, FL | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Lake Haven Nursing and Rehab Center | 3.8 mi | Dunedin, FL | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Aviata at Oldsmar | 4.1 mi | Oldsmar, FL | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Aviata at Lakeside Oaks | 4.5 mi | Dunedin, FL | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Meadowpark Health and Rehabilitation Center | 4.5 mi | Dunedin, FL | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Willowbrooke Court Skilled Care Center at Mease Li | 4.7 mi | Dunedin, FL | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Aviata at the Harbor | 4.8 mi | Safety Harbor, FL | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Regency Oaks Health Center | 4.9 mi | Clearwater, FL | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
Other facilities in the same county
CMS records place this facility in Pinellas, FL — 65 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
- Oaks of Clearwater, the — Clearwater, FL · overall 2/5
- Palm Garden of Largo — Largo, FL · overall 2/5abuse
- Palm Garden of Pinellas — Largo, FL · overall 1/5
- Peninsula Health Center by Harborview — Tarpon Springs, FL · overall 3/5
- Pinellas Park FL Opco, LLC — Pinellas Park, FL · overall 1/5abuse
- Pinellas Point Nursing and Rehab Center — Saint Petersburg, FL · overall 2/5
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 105708.
This page is the printable visit checklist. If your browser did not open the print dialog automatically, use File → Print (Ctrl/⌘-P).