CaliforniaOakland

Oakland Heights Nursing and Rehabilitation

2361 East 29th Street, Oakland, CA 94606 · Alameda County · 48 certified beds · avg 46 residents/day · certified since Oct 14, 1993

Part of chain: ASPEN SKILLED HEALTHCARE (35 facilities, chain avg rating 3.7★)

4/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
0
Serious findings on record
$7,409
Fines, last 3 years
4.01
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 5/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

All citations in the current public record (21)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Apr 10, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Apr 10, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs.
Apr 10, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Apr 10, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Apr 10, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not designate a qualified infection preventionist — a trained person responsible for running the infection prevention and control program.
May 6, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint
Nov 3, 2023F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not employ enough qualified food and nutrition staff, including a qualified dietician, to properly run its food service.
Nov 3, 2023F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility's menus did not meet residents' nutritional needs, or were not prepared in advance, followed as written, kept up to date, or reviewed by a dietician.
Nov 3, 2023F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not serve food and drinks that were appetizing, attractive, and at a safe and pleasant temperature.
Nov 3, 2023F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Nov 3, 2023F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
Nov 3, 2023F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not keep all essential equipment working safely — things like heating and cooling systems, kitchen equipment, and medical devices.
Nov 3, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not update each resident's care assessment at least once every 3 months. These regular check-ins keep the resident's care plan matched to their current condition.
Nov 3, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not fully assess residents on time — a complete assessment of health, abilities, and needs is required when a resident is first admitted and at least once every 12 months after that.
Nov 3, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
Nov 3, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe, appropriate care for residents who need dialysis — the treatment that filters the blood when kidneys fail.
Nov 3, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide or arrange dental services for its residents. Nursing homes are responsible for making sure residents can get dental care.
Nov 3, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide special eating equipment and utensils — like adaptive cups or easy-grip silverware — for residents who need them, along with appropriate help at meals.
Nov 4, 2021E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Nov 4, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe, appropriate care for residents who need dialysis — the treatment that filters the blood when kidneys fail.
Nov 4, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (12 → 5).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202130E
2023120F
202410D
202550E

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

1 fine totaling $7,409.

DateTypeAmount / length
Sep 18, 2023Fine$7,409

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityCalifornia avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)4.014.313.95bottom 42% in California; top 39% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.690.610.69top 25% in California; top 38% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.603.903.50bottom 39% in California; top 38% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.510.510.48top 29% in California; top 31% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)35.436.745.8top 48% in California; top 25% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)42.938.142.9bottom 39% in California; bottom 49% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.52, RN 0.78, weekend 4.06. Staffing rating: 4/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 4/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Aotn LLCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%11/07/2014
Bradshaw, PeterIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE07/07/2023
Elsner, EricIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE11/07/2014
Kirkwood, JaredIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2019
Orgill, CraigIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2019
Parti, RajeshIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE11/07/2014
Parti, ShrutyIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE11/07/2014
Paxman, MarcusIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2022
Aotn LLCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE11/07/2014
Aotn LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE11/07/2014
Aspen Healthcare Services LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2023
Bradshaw, JeffreyIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE06/15/2014
Bradshaw, JeffreyIndividualIndividual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/05/2026
Bradshaw, JeffreyIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2023
Brady, VernIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE06/15/2014
Brady, VernIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2023
Brown, AdamIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2001
Brown, AdamIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2001
Case, RyanIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE06/15/2014
Case, RyanIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2023

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Bay Marina Post Acute0.6 miOakland, CA★★★☆☆2/5
Bellaken Skilled Nursing Center0.6 miOakland, CA★★★★★5/5
Mercy Retirement & Care Center1.0 miOakland, CA★★★★☆4/5
Garfield Neurobehavioral Center1.0 miOakland, CA★★★☆☆2/5abuse
Bay Area Healthcare Center1.1 miOakland, CA★★★★★5/5
Fruitvale Healthcare Center1.1 miOakland, CA★★★★★5/5
Lake Merritt Healthcare Center LLC1.7 miOakland, CA★★☆☆☆2/5
Redwood Healthcare Center LLC1.8 miOakland, CA★★★★☆4/5
Lake Park Healthcare Center1.8 miOakland, CA★★★☆☆3/5
Excell Health Care Center1.8 miOakland, CA★★★★★5/5
St Paul's Towers2.0 miOakland, CA★★★★★4/5
Marina Garden Nursing Center2.2 miAlameda, CA★★★★★5/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Oakland →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 555570.