Petaluma Post-Acute Rehabilitation

Name: Petaluma Post-Acute Rehabilitation
Address: 1115 B STREET, Petaluma, CA, 94952, US
Telephone: 7077653030

1115 B Street, Petaluma, CA 94952 · Sonoma County · 90 certified beds · avg 78 residents/day · certified since May 22, 1969

Part of chain: ASPEN SKILLED HEALTHCARE (35 facilities, chain avg rating 3.7★)

5/5

Health inspection rating (on-site)

Serious findings on record

Fines, last 3 years

4.76

Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★★★5/5 · CMS overall rating: 5/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

All citations in the current public record (16)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

Date	Severity	What the facility was cited for
Dec 19, 2025	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not help a resident get vision and hearing services — such as eye exams, glasses, hearing tests, or hearing aids.
Dec 19, 2025	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Dec 19, 2025	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Dec 19, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide required paperwork or notices about a resident's needs, their right to appeal a transfer or discharge, or the facility's bed-hold policy (how long a bed is saved during a hospital stay).
Mar 12, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not properly plan a resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs after leaving. · from a complaint
Dec 19, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not allow residents to take their own medications when a clinical review showed they could do so safely. Residents have this right if their care team determines it's appropriate.
Dec 19, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Mar 11, 2022	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not honor residents' right to receive the visitors they choose, at the times they choose.
Mar 11, 2022	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not provide activities that meet residents' needs and interests. Nursing homes must offer meaningful activity programs, not just leave residents idle.
Mar 11, 2022	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Mar 11, 2022	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Mar 11, 2022	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
Mar 11, 2022	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not properly plan a resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs after leaving.
Mar 11, 2022	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration.
Mar 11, 2022	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide necessary behavioral health care and services — support for residents' mental and emotional wellbeing, including conditions like depression and anxiety.
Mar 11, 2022	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not keep residents' medications free from unnecessary drugs. Residents should only take medicines they truly need, at the right dose, for a clear reason.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (2 → 4).

Year	Citations	Worst severity that year
2022	9	E
2024	2	D
2025	5	E

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

Measure	This facility	California avg	U.S. avg	Where it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)	4.76	4.31	3.95	top 20% in California; top 17% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours	1.25	0.61	0.69	top 6% in California; top 8% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing	4.55	3.90	3.50	top 13% in California; top 11% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)	1.04	0.51	0.48	top 7% in California; top 5% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)	31.4	36.7	45.8	top 34% in California; top 17% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)	35.0	38.1	42.9	top 46% in California; top 38% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.22, RN 1.11, weekend 4.04. Staffing rating: 5/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Limited Liability company

Owner / manager	Type	Role	Stake	Since
Aptb, LLC	Organization	5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest	100%	06/25/2019
Bradshaw, Peter	Individual	Indirect Ownership Interest	NOT APPLICABLE	07/07/2023
Elsner, Eric	Individual	Indirect Ownership Interest	NOT APPLICABLE	06/25/2019
Kirkwood, Jared	Individual	Indirect Ownership Interest	NOT APPLICABLE	06/25/2019
Orgill, Craig	Individual	Indirect Ownership Interest	NOT APPLICABLE	06/25/2019
Parti, Rajesh	Individual	Indirect Ownership Interest	NOT APPLICABLE	06/25/2019
Parti, Shruty	Individual	Indirect Ownership Interest	NOT APPLICABLE	06/25/2019
Paxman, Marcus	Individual	Indirect Ownership Interest	NOT APPLICABLE	04/01/2022
Aptb, LLC	Organization	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	06/25/2019
Aptb, LLC	Organization	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	06/25/2019
Aspen Healthcare Services LLC	Organization	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	01/01/2023
Bradshaw, Jeffrey	Individual	Individual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	04/08/2026
Bradshaw, Jeffrey	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	01/01/2023
Brady, Vern	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	01/01/2023
Case, Ryan	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	01/01/2023
East West Bank	Organization	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	06/25/2019
Jurado, Frank	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	01/01/2023
Kraft, Shirley	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	11/01/2018
Kraft, Shirley	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	11/01/2018
McLaughlin, Haley	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	11/20/2020

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

"How do you arrange eye and hearing care for residents, including appointments and equipment like glasses or hearing aids?"
"Can you show me how medications are stored and secured on the units, including controlled drugs?"
"Who leads your infection prevention program, and how do you make sure staff follow practices like hand hygiene every day?"
"What written notices do we get before any transfer or discharge, and what is your bed-hold policy?"
"How do you prepare residents and families for discharge, and what support do you arrange for after they leave?"
"If my family member is able to manage their own medications, would you allow it, and how is that decided?"
"What are your visiting policies — can family visit any time the resident wants?"
"Can I see this month's activities calendar, and what do you offer residents who can't leave their rooms?"
"What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
"Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

Facility	Distance	City	Overall	Inspection	Flags
Hillcrest Post Acute	0.0 mi	Petaluma, CA	★★★★☆	4/5
Ridgeway Post Acute	0.1 mi	Petaluma, CA	★☆☆☆☆	1/5
North Bay Post Acute	0.7 mi	Petaluma, CA	★☆☆☆☆	1/5	abuse
Vineyard Post Acute	2.5 mi	Petaluma, CA	★★★☆☆	2/5
Novato Healthcare Center	9.5 mi	Novato, CA	★☆☆☆☆	1/5	abuse
Valley of the Moon Post Acute	10.8 mi	Sonoma, CA	★★★☆☆	2/5	abuse
Broadway Villa Post Acute	11.0 mi	Sonoma, CA	★★★★★	3/5
Sonoma Post Acute	11.3 mi	Sonoma, CA	★★★★☆	3/5
Northvine Postacute Care	14.3 mi	Santa Rosa, CA	★☆☆☆☆	1/5
Apple Valley Post-Acute Rehab	14.8 mi	Sebastopol, CA	★★★★★	4/5
Santa Rosa Post Acute	15.2 mi	Santa Rosa, CA	★★★☆☆	2/5
Blue Oak Post-Acute	15.3 mi	Santa Rosa, CA	★★☆☆☆	1/5	abuse

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Petaluma →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 056072.

The Care File

Visit checklist — Petaluma Post-Acute Rehabilitation

1115 B Street, Petaluma, CA 94952 · 7077653030

Health inspection rating 5/5 · CMS overall 5/5· Fines (3y): $0

Questions for the administrator:

☐ "How do you arrange eye and hearing care for residents, including appointments and equipment like glasses or hearing aids?"
☐ "Can you show me how medications are stored and secured on the units, including controlled drugs?"
☐ "Who leads your infection prevention program, and how do you make sure staff follow practices like hand hygiene every day?"
☐ "What written notices do we get before any transfer or discharge, and what is your bed-hold policy?"
☐ "How do you prepare residents and families for discharge, and what support do you arrange for after they leave?"
☐ "If my family member is able to manage their own medications, would you allow it, and how is that decided?"
☐ "What are your visiting policies — can family visit any time the resident wants?"
☐ "Can I see this month's activities calendar, and what do you offer residents who can't leave their rooms?"
☐ "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
☐ "Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"

While you're there, notice:

☐ Smell and cleanliness in hallways, not just the lobby
☐ How staff speak to residents; call lights answered promptly
☐ Residents up, dressed, and engaged (visit mealtimes and a weekend if you can)

Data: CMS Provider Data Catalog, version 2026-08-01 · CCN 056072 · Verify at medicare.gov/care-compare · Printed from The Care File (thecarefile.com)