How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
San Leandro Healthcare Center
368 Juana Avenue, San Leandro, CA 94577 (opens Google Maps) · Alameda County · (510) 357-4015· 62 certified beds · avg 54 residents/day · certified since Sep 1, 1972 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: PRATAP PODDATOORI (6 facilities, chain avg rating 3.5★)
4/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
inspected Nov 7, 2024
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
4.46
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)
Every record stays on this page.
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Inspection findings in the public record
Showing the latest 3 of 28 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · from a complaint F-0550
The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · from a complaint F-0550
The facility did not let a resident help develop and carry out their own plan of care — the written roadmap of the services and support they'll receive, built around their personal goals and preferences. · from a complaint F-0553
View all 28 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 9, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · from a complaint · F-0550 |
| Nov 26, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · from a complaint · F-0550 |
| Nov 26, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not let a resident help develop and carry out their own plan of care — the written roadmap of the services and support they'll receive, built around their personal goals and preferences. · from a complaint · F-0553 |
| Nov 7, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not properly inform residents or their representatives about arbitration agreements — contracts that give up the right to sue in court — including their right to refuse to sign. · F-0847 |
| Nov 7, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide a neutral and fair arbitration process. Arbitration is a way of settling disputes outside of court, and if it's used, the facility must agree with the resident on a neutral arbitrator and a convenient location. · F-0848 |
| Nov 7, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · F-0584 |
| Nov 7, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not enter each resident's assessment information into the required format and send it to the state within 7 days of completing the assessment, as the rules require. · F-0640 |
| Nov 7, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · F-0641 |
| Nov 7, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| Nov 7, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · F-0677 |
| Nov 7, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689 |
| Nov 7, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · F-0755 |
| Nov 7, 2024 | B · Potential for minimal harm, pattern | The facility had resident rooms smaller than required — at least 80 square feet per person in shared rooms and 100 square feet in single rooms. · F-0912 |
| Sep 12, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not properly prepare residents for a safe transfer or discharge. Before a resident leaves, the facility must get them ready and make sure the move is safe and orderly. · from a complaint · F-0624 |
| Nov 17, 2022 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not provide each resident with a nourishing, tasty, well-balanced diet that meets their daily nutritional and special dietary needs. · F-0800 |
| Nov 17, 2022 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups. · F-0558 |
| Nov 17, 2022 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · F-0695 |
| Nov 17, 2022 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · F-0755 |
| Nov 17, 2022 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not conduct and document a facility-wide assessment of what staff, supplies, and resources it needs to care for its residents properly — during everyday operations, nights, weekends, and emergencies. · F-0838 |
| Nov 17, 2022 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Nov 17, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep residents' personal and medical information private and confidential. · F-0583 |
| Nov 17, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not give residents (and their representatives and the ombudsman, a state advocate for residents) proper advance notice before a transfer or discharge, including information about their right to appeal. · F-0623 |
| Nov 17, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689 |
| Nov 17, 2022 | B · Potential for minimal harm, pattern | The facility had resident rooms smaller than required — at least 80 square feet per person in shared rooms and 100 square feet in single rooms. · F-0912 |
| Mar 28, 2019 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Mar 28, 2019 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Mar 28, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep residents' personal and medical information private and confidential. · F-0583 |
| Mar 28, 2019 | B · Potential for minimal harm, pattern | The facility had resident rooms smaller than required — at least 80 square feet per person in shared rooms and 100 square feet in single rooms. · F-0912 |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (10 → 10).
All citationsSerious citations (G–L)
2019
All citations: 4
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2022
All citations: 10
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2023
All citations: 1
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2024
All citations: 10
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2025
All citations: 2
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2026
All citations: 1
Serious citations (G–L): 0
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 4 | 0 | E |
| 2022 | 10 | 0 | F |
| 2023 | 1 | 0 | D |
| 2024 | 10 | 0 | E |
| 2025 | 2 | 0 | D |
| 2026 | 1 | 0 | D |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
What these staffing numbers mean →
This facilityCalifornia averageU.S. average
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)
This facility: 4.46
California average: 4.31
U.S. average: 3.95
Registered Nurse hours
This facility: 0.58
California average: 0.61
U.S. average: 0.69
Weekend total nurse staffing
This facility: 4.07
California average: 3.90
U.S. average: 3.50
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | California avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 4.46 | 4.31 | 3.95 | top 30% in California; top 24% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.58 | 0.61 | 0.69 | top 34% in California; bottom 50% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 4.07 | 3.90 | 3.50 | top 30% in California; top 21% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.37 | 0.51 | 0.48 | top 49% in California; bottom 47% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 37.5 | 36.7 | 45.8 | bottom 46% in California; top 30% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 40.0 | 38.1 | 42.9 | bottom 47% in California; top 46% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.14, RN 0.54, weekend 3.77.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (4.14 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 4/5.
Quality measures: assessments & claims
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: 4/5
Costs & payment
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for San Leandro Healthcare Center. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Calculate a stay from a quote you receive
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Before you compare prices
- Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
- Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
- Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
Who owns this facility
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Corporation
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Poddatoori, Pratap | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 100% | 05/13/2003 |
| Alcantara, Cheryl | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2009 |
| Alcantara, Cheryl | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2009 |
| Andres, Norma | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/01/2004 |
| Andres, Norma | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/01/2004 |
| Cortez, Carlos | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/09/2024 |
| Cortez, Carlos | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/09/2024 |
| Dhugga, Gurpreet | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/16/2019 |
| Dhugga, Gurpreet | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/16/2019 |
| Ehrenfeld, Marianne | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/16/2023 |
| Ehrenfeld, Marianne | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/16/2023 |
| Guerrero, Sylvia | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/01/2022 |
| Guerrero, Sylvia | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/01/2022 |
| Hycare INC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/07/2006 |
| Hycare INC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/10/2025 |
| Kakkar, Kanika | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/25/2023 |
| Kakkar, Kanika | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/25/2023 |
| Lopez, Lucilla | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/01/2016 |
| Lopez, Lucilla | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/01/2016 |
| Madamba, Lara | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/25/2023 |
Showing 20 of 34 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 14 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.
Other facilities in the same chain
CMS lists this facility under the chain Pratap Poddatoori — 6 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
- Willow Pass Healthcare Center — Concord, CA · overall 3/5
- Elmwood Care Center — Berkeley, CA · overall 3/5
- Jones Convalescent Hospital — San Leandro, CA · overall 4/5
- Kyakameena Care Center — Berkeley, CA · overall 3/5
- Red Bluff Health Care Center — Red Bluff, CA · overall 4/5
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking.
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "Can you give me examples of how your staff protect residents' dignity in everyday care, like bathing and dressing?"
- "How are residents and families included in care plan meetings, and how often do those meetings happen?"
- "Is signing an arbitration agreement required for admission, and can we refuse it without affecting my family member's care?"
- "Does your admission agreement include an arbitration clause, and is signing it optional?"
- "Can we tour the resident rooms, bathrooms, and common areas today, including areas not on the usual tour route?"
- "How do you make sure resident assessments are completed and submitted to the state on time?"
- "Who completes resident assessments here, and how do you check them for accuracy?"
- "Can you show me an example care plan, and how are families included when it's created and updated?"
Also worth asking anywhere
- "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
- "Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
- "CMS reports 38% total nursing staff turnover here — who on the care team has been with you longest?"
- "The ownership record on file lists 34 owning or managing parties — who makes the decisions about staffing levels?"
- "Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"
Nearby facilities (12 closest of 124 within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bancroft Healthcare Center | 0.1 mi | San Leandro, CA | ★★★☆☆ | 4/5 | |
| Jones Convalescent Hospital | 0.2 mi | San Leandro, CA | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Washington Center | 1.8 mi | San Leandro, CA | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Alameda County Medical Center D/P SNF | 2.0 mi | San Leandro, CA | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| All Saint's Subacute & Transitional Care | 2.1 mi | San Leandro, CA | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| All Saint's Maubert | 2.1 mi | San Leandro, CA | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Valley Pointe Nursing & Rehabilitation Center | 3.8 mi | Castro Valley, CA | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| East Bay Post-Acute | 3.8 mi | Castro Valley, CA | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| St Francis Healthcare Center | 4.1 mi | Hayward, CA | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Princeton Manor Healthcare Center, LLC | 4.2 mi | Oakland, CA | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Morton Bakar Center | 4.2 mi | Hayward, CA | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Driftwood Healthcare Center - Hayward | 4.2 mi | Hayward, CA | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
Other facilities in the same county
CMS records place this facility in Alameda, CA — 69 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
- Serenethos Care Center, LLC — Hayward, CA · overall 5/5
- St Anthony Care Center — Hayward, CA · overall 5/5
- St John Kronstadt Convalescent Center — Castro Valley, CA · overall 5/5
- St Paul's Towers — Oakland, CA · overall 5/5
- Stratford Villa Post-Acute — Livermore, CA · overall 4/5
- The Rehabilitation Center of Oakland — Oakland, CA · overall 1/5
- The Vineyards Healthcare Center — Livermore, CA · overall 5/5
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 056345.