OhioCincinnati

Parkview Northwest Healthcare Center

3875 East Galbraith Road, Cincinnati, OH 45236 · Hamilton County · 73 certified beds · avg 61 residents/day · certified since Feb 12, 2003

Part of chain: COMMUNICARE HEALTH (110 facilities, chain avg rating 3.2★)

3/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
1
Serious findings on record
$36,185
Fines, last 3 years
3.21
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · May 7, 2024 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.

Corrected: May 8, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (35)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Sep 12, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not coordinate resident assessments with the state's pre-admission screening program for mental illness and intellectual disabilities, or failed to refer residents for the special services they need.
May 7, 2024▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Aug 30, 2021F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not have a registered nurse on duty at least 8 hours a day, or did not have a registered nurse serving full-time as director of nursing.
Aug 30, 2021F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Aug 30, 2021E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist.
Aug 30, 2021E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems.
Aug 30, 2021E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits.
Aug 30, 2021E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Aug 30, 2021E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures for offering residents flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
Aug 30, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups.
Aug 30, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care.
Aug 30, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.
Aug 30, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not properly complete the required screening (called PASARR) that identifies whether a person entering a nursing home has a mental illness or intellectual disability and needs specialized services.
Aug 30, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Aug 30, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offWhen a resident had a planned discharge, the facility did not make sure the necessary information was communicated to the resident and to the doctors or facility taking over their care.
Aug 30, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide activities that meet residents' needs and interests. Nursing homes must offer meaningful activity programs, not just leave residents idle.
Aug 30, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility used bed rails without first trying safer alternatives, or without assessing the resident's safety risk, discussing the risks and benefits with the resident or family, getting consent, and installing the rails correctly.
Aug 30, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide special eating equipment and utensils — like adaptive cups or easy-grip silverware — for residents who need them, along with appropriate help at meals.
Aug 30, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards.
Aug 30, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have a working call system — the button or cord residents use to summon help — in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
Aug 30, 2021C · Minimal risk, facility-wideThe facility did not give residents important notices in a format and language they can understand — for example, translated documents or accessible formats for those with vision or hearing loss.
Feb 21, 2019F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not employ enough qualified food and nutrition staff, including a qualified dietician, to properly run its food service.
Feb 21, 2019E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs.
Feb 21, 2019E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not keep its building and grounds safe, functional, clean, and comfortable for residents, staff, and visitors.
Feb 21, 2019D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away.
Feb 21, 2019D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft. These written safeguards are the foundation of resident protection.
Feb 21, 2019D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation.
Feb 21, 2019D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do.
Feb 21, 2019D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not give residents (and their representatives and the ombudsman, a state advocate for residents) proper advance notice before a transfer or discharge, including information about their right to appeal.
Feb 21, 2019D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not create and follow a basic care plan covering a new resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of admission. The first days are when a new resident is most vulnerable.
Feb 21, 2019D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
Feb 21, 2019D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Feb 21, 2019D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist.
Feb 21, 2019D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Feb 21, 2019C · Minimal risk, facility-wideThe facility did not have a registered nurse on duty at least 8 hours a day, or did not have a registered nurse serving full-time as director of nursing.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (19 → 1).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
2019140F
2021190F
202421J ▲

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

1 fine totaling $36,185.

DateTypeAmount / length
May 7, 2024Fine$36,185

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityOhio avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.213.453.95bottom 41% in Ohio; bottom 22% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.610.600.69top 38% in Ohio; top 47% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing2.993.073.50top 45% in Ohio; bottom 30% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.530.420.48top 22% in Ohio; top 29% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)35.948.745.8top 18% in Ohio; top 26% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)25.043.942.9top 20% in Ohio; top 20% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.22, RN 0.61, weekend 3.00. Staffing rating: 3/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: —/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Buckeye Healthcare Holdings LLCOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest07/01/2021
Buckeye Op Co LLCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%07/01/2021
Omg MSTR Lsco, LLCOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest07/01/2021
Buckeye Healthcare Holdings LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2021
C.R. Stoltz Family Investment Company INCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2021
C.R. Stoltz Irrevocable TrustOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2021
Groves, DonnaIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE04/14/2023
Health Care Holdings, LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2021
I. Rosedale Family Investment Company INCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2021
I. Rosedale Irrevocable TrustOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2021
Karev, MillaIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2021
Karev, MillaIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2021
Near Knoll Mgt Co., LLCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2021
Near Knoll Mgt Co., LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE05/07/2025
Omg MSTR Lsco, LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2021
R.S. Wilheim Irrevocable TrustOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2021
Romeo, DominicIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2023
Romeo, DominicIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2023
Ronald S Wilheim 2012 Spousal TrustOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2021
Rosedale Family Investment Company, INCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2021

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Chamberlin Healthcare Center0.1 miCincinnati, OH★★★★★4/5
Astoria Place of Silverton1.0 miCincinnati, OH★★☆☆☆1/5
Mount Notre Dame Health Center1.7 miCincinnati, OH★★★★★5/5
Blue Ash Health & Rehab2.2 miCincinnati, OH★☆☆☆☆2/5
Courtyard at Seasons2.2 miCincinnati, OH★★★★☆3/5
Kenwood Terrace Healthcare Center2.2 miCincinnati, OH★★★★☆3/5
Ayden Healthcare of Madeira2.6 miCincinnati, OH★☆☆☆☆1/5
Pleasant Ridge Healthcare Center2.8 miCincinnati, OH★★★★☆3/5
Montgomery Care Center2.8 miCincinnati, OH★★★☆☆3/5
Madeira Healthcare Center2.9 miCincinnati, OH★★★★☆3/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Cincinnati →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 366256.