TexasRio Grande City

Rio Grande City Nursing and Rehabilitation Center

2530 Central Palm Dr, Rio Grande City, TX 78582 · Starr County · 110 certified beds · avg 88 residents/day · certified since Oct 19, 2006

Part of chain: WELLSENTIAL HEALTH (67 facilities, chain avg rating 2.7★)

4/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
1
Serious findings on record
$13,514
Fines, last 3 years
2.87
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Nov 4, 2024 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Nov 8, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (18)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Jun 11, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint
May 5, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint
Nov 20, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make sure residents were fully informed about their own health, care, and treatments in a way they could understand. · from a complaint
Nov 20, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make sure its nurses and nurse aides had the skills and training needed to properly care for every resident. · from a complaint
Nov 20, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · from a complaint
Sep 10, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups.
Sep 10, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care.
Sep 10, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide required paperwork or notices about a resident's needs, their right to appeal a transfer or discharge, or the facility's bed-hold policy (how long a bed is saved during a hospital stay).
Sep 10, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not safely and appropriately administer IV fluids (fluids given through a vein) for residents who needed them.
Sep 10, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Sep 10, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Nov 4, 2024▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Nov 4, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · from a complaint
Aug 8, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits.
Aug 8, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Jun 20, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint
Jun 20, 2024C · Minimal risk, facility-wideThe facility did not post its nurse staffing information every day. Nursing homes must publicly display how many nurses and aides are on duty each day. · from a complaint
May 18, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (2 → 6).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202310D
202461G ▲
202590D
202620D

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

1 fine totaling $13,514.

DateTypeAmount / length
Nov 4, 2024Fine$13,514

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityTexas avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)2.873.463.95bottom 15% in Texas; bottom 10% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.410.440.69top 45% in Texas; bottom 23% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing2.583.043.50bottom 21% in Texas; bottom 12% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.290.340.48bottom 49% in Texas; bottom 29% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)24.255.345.8top 2% in Texas; top 6% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)44.454.642.9top 37% in Texas; bottom 45% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.28, RN 0.47, weekend 2.95. Staffing rating: 2/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5

Who owns this facility

Government - Hospital district

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
CSV Rhea Management Holdco, LLCOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE02/28/2015
DWD TX Holdings LLCOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE02/28/2015
Jack and Nancy Dwyer Workforce Development Center INCOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE02/28/2015
Reg HG Opco 1, LLCOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE02/28/2015
Reg HG Opco LLCOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE02/28/2015
Reg Operator Holdco LLCOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE02/28/2015
Regency Ihs of Rio Grande City, LLCOrganizationDirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE02/28/2015
Regency Integrated Health Services LLCOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE02/28/2015
Regency Texas Holdings LLCOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE02/28/2015
Starr County Hospital DistrictOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%02/28/2015
2530 Central Palm Drive LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE02/28/2015
Baird, DanielIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE04/13/2021
Clapp, BarbaraIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2021
Cortese, DarenIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE08/10/2021
Dekowski, DonovanIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE02/28/2015
Dekowski, DonovanIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE02/28/2015
Gibson, PatriciaIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE08/01/2021
Gonzales, AnaIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2025
Guerra, AdrianIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2016
Mandelbaum, ElliotIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2025

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Starr County Nursing and Transitional Care10.7 miRio Grande City, TX★★★★☆4/5

Compare this facility with the 1 closest →

All facilities in Rio Grande City →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 676119.