How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
300 Meadow Lakes, East Windsor, NJ 08520 (opens Google Maps) · Mercer County · (609) 448-4100· 60 certified beds · avg 51 residents/day · certified since Jan 1, 1967 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: SPRINGPOINT SENIOR LIVING (8 facilities, chain avg rating 3.8★)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Showing the latest 3 of 19 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not enter each resident's assessment information into the required format and send it to the state within 7 days of completing the assessment, as the rules require. F-0640
The facility did not conduct and document a facility-wide assessment of what staff, supplies, and resources it needs to care for its residents properly — during everyday operations, nights, weekends, and emergencies. F-0838
The facility did not have a written plan describing how it runs its quality improvement program — the ongoing process of finding problems in care and fixing them. F-0865
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 18, 2025 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not enter each resident's assessment information into the required format and send it to the state within 7 days of completing the assessment, as the rules require. · F-0640 |
| Mar 18, 2025 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not conduct and document a facility-wide assessment of what staff, supplies, and resources it needs to care for its residents properly — during everyday operations, nights, weekends, and emergencies. · F-0838 |
| Mar 18, 2025 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not have a written plan describing how it runs its quality improvement program — the ongoing process of finding problems in care and fixing them. · F-0865 |
| Mar 18, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · F-0550 |
| Mar 18, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689 |
| Mar 18, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it. · F-0697 |
| Mar 18, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide safe, appropriate care for residents who need dialysis — the treatment that filters the blood when kidneys fail. · F-0698 |
| Mar 18, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Mar 18, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · F-0677 |
| Mar 18, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide basic life support, such as CPR, before emergency medical help arrived — care that's required when it matches the doctor's orders and the resident's own written wishes. · F-0678 |
| Mar 18, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · F-0755 |
| Jan 11, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems. · F-0756 |
| Jan 11, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Jan 11, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not perform required COVID-19 testing on residents and staff. · F-0886 |
| Jan 11, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have enough backup water supply for essential areas of the building. · F-0922 |
| Jan 11, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not reassess a resident after a significant change in their condition, such as a sudden decline in health. A full new assessment is required when a resident's condition changes in a major way. · F-0637 |
| Jan 11, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · F-0658 |
| Jan 11, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689 |
| Jan 11, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not observe each nurse aide's job performance or provide regular training as required. · F-0730 |
Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (8 → 11).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 8 | 0 | E |
| 2025 | 11 | 0 | F |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | New Jersey avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 4.57 | 3.88 | 3.95 | top 15% in New Jersey; top 21% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 1.23 | 0.67 | 0.69 | top 7% in New Jersey; top 9% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 4.10 | 3.53 | 3.50 | top 17% in New Jersey; top 20% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.88 | 0.50 | 0.48 | top 9% in New Jersey; top 9% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 42.1 | 39.7 | 45.8 | bottom 41% in New Jersey; top 42% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 52.9 | 37.7 | 42.9 | bottom 20% in New Jersey; bottom 31% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.63, RN 1.25, weekend 4.16.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (4.63 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 5/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: 2/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Meadow Lakes. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
Non profit - Corporation
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Argondizza, Anthony | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2017 |
| Argondizza, Anthony | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2017 |
| Kopec, Marybeth | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/05/1996 |
| Kopec, Marybeth | Individual | Individual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/05/2025 |
| Kopec, Marybeth | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/05/1996 |
| Midgett, Garrett | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/05/2009 |
| Midgett, Garrett | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/05/1996 |
| Midgett, Garrett | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/08/2008 |
| Springpoint Senior Living INC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/05/1996 |
| Springpoint Senior Living INC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/08/2008 |
All 10 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.
CMS lists this facility under the chain Springpoint Senior Living — 8 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gardens at Monroe Healthcare and Rehabilitation, T | 3.1 mi | Monroe Township, NJ | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| The Elms Rehab and Healthcare Center of Cranbury | 4.0 mi | Cranbury, NJ | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Cranbury Center | 4.3 mi | Monroe Township, NJ | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Avalon Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center | 7.5 mi | Hamilton, NJ | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Village Point | 7.5 mi | Monroe Township, NJ | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Merwick Care & Rehabilitation Center, LLC | 7.8 mi | Plainsboro, NJ | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Preferred Care at Hamilton | 7.9 mi | Hamilton Square, NJ | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Carnegie Post Acute Care at Princeton LLC | 8.7 mi | Princeton, NJ | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Complete Care at Park Place LLC | 8.9 mi | Monmouth Junction, NJ | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Accela Post Acute Care at Hamilton | 8.9 mi | Hamilton, NJ | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Complete Care at Mercerville LLC | 9.2 mi | Hamilton Township, NJ | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Excel Care at Manalapan | 9.7 mi | Manalapan, NJ | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
CMS records place this facility in Mercer, NJ — 16 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 315022.
This page is the printable visit checklist. If your browser did not open the print dialog automatically, use File → Print (Ctrl/⌘-P).
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details