New YorkUtica

Masonic Care Community of New York

2150 Bleecker Street, Utica, NY 13501 · Oneida County · 320 certified beds · avg 298 residents/day · certified since Apr 1, 1976

1/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
1
Serious findings on record
$88,433
Fines, last 3 years
4.43
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★☆☆☆☆1/5 · CMS overall rating: 1/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, repeated · Nov 12, 2025 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (K): A life-threatening or extremely dangerous situation affected several residents. Among the most serious findings an inspection can produce.

Corrected: Jan 9, 2026 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (28)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Apr 6, 2026F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not give residents reasonable access to and privacy in using ways to communicate, such as phones, mail, and email. Residents have the right to stay in touch with the outside world privately.
Apr 6, 2026F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · from a complaint
Apr 6, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not honor residents' right to make their own choices about their daily lives, such as when to wake up, what to eat, or how to spend their time.
Apr 6, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Apr 6, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not serve food and drinks that were appetizing, attractive, and at a safe and pleasant temperature.
Apr 6, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Apr 6, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · from a complaint
Apr 6, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not allow residents to take their own medications when a clinical review showed they could do so safely. Residents have this right if their care team determines it's appropriate.
Apr 6, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Apr 6, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.
Apr 6, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility used feeding tubes without a valid medical reason or the resident's agreement, or did not provide proper care to residents who have feeding tubes.
Apr 6, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Nov 12, 2025▲ K · Immediate jeopardy, repeatedThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
May 17, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not honor residents' right to voice complaints without discrimination or retaliation, or did not have a working complaint process that resolves issues promptly.
May 17, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not allow residents to take their own medications when a clinical review showed they could do so safely. Residents have this right if their care team determines it's appropriate.
May 17, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
May 17, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.
May 17, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility used bed rails without first trying safer alternatives, or without assessing the resident's safety risk, discussing the risks and benefits with the resident or family, getting consent, and installing the rails correctly.
May 17, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication.
May 17, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Dec 7, 2021E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide residents with enough to drink, or with drinks matching their needs and preferences, to keep them properly hydrated.
Dec 7, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs.
Dec 7, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Dec 7, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Dec 7, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not post its nurse staffing information every day. Nursing homes must publicly display how many nurses and aides are on duty each day.
Dec 7, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication.
Dec 7, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Dec 7, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (7 → 12).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202180E
202470E
202511K ▲
2026120F

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

1 fine totaling $88,433.

DateTypeAmount / length
Nov 12, 2025Fine$88,433

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityNew York avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)4.433.583.95top 14% in New York; top 25% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.470.680.69bottom 30% in New York; bottom 34% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing4.033.133.50top 10% in New York; top 22% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.260.480.48bottom 30% in New York; bottom 24% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)30.740.345.8top 31% in New York; top 16% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)22.239.842.9top 13% in New York; top 17% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.94, RN 0.42, weekend 3.58. Staffing rating: 4/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: 3/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5

Who owns this facility

Non profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Filippidis, GeorgeIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE12/16/2019
Getman, GeorgeIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2014
Heinrich, KeithIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE05/03/2016
Hough, ChristopherIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE05/17/2019
Lipper, NathanIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2014
Morris, GeorgeIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE05/03/2016
Raffle, RobertIndividualW-2 Managing EmployeeNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2010
Raffle, RobertIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2010
Saglimbene, JosephIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE05/03/2016
Siegel, MichaelIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE05/05/2015
Spencer, DavidIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE05/05/2015
Wynne, JillIndividualW-2 Managing EmployeeNOT APPLICABLE10/01/1993
Wynne, JillIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE08/15/1994

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Oneida Center for Rehabilitation and Nursing2.9 miUtica, NY★☆☆☆☆3/5
Charles T Sitrin Health Care Center INC3.2 miNew Hartford, NY★★☆☆☆1/5
The Pines at Utica Center for Nursing and Rehab3.5 miUtica, NY★☆☆☆☆2/5
The Grand Rehabilitation and Nursing at Utica3.6 miUtica, NY★☆☆☆☆1/5SFF
MVHS Rehabilitation and Nursing Center4.5 miUtica, NY★★★☆☆3/5
Utica Rehabilitation & Nursing Center4.5 miUtica, NY★☆☆☆☆1/5
Presbyterian Home for Central New York INC8.0 miNew Hartford, NY★☆☆☆☆2/5
The Grand Rehabilitation and Nursing at Mohawk8.5 miIlion, NY★☆☆☆☆1/5
Trustees of Eastern Star Hall & Home of the N Y S8.7 miOriskany, NY★☆☆☆☆2/5
Katherine Luther Residential HLTH Care & Rehab9.2 miClinton, NY★☆☆☆☆1/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Utica →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 335541.