FloridaAventura

Regents Park at Aventura

18905 NE 25th Ave, Aventura, FL 33180 · Miami-Dade County · 180 certified beds · avg 174 residents/day · certified since Jan 12, 1988

Part of chain: VENTURA SERVICES (14 facilities, chain avg rating 3.2★)

2/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
2
Serious findings on record
$64,981
Fines, last 3 years
3.55
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 2/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Sep 19, 2024 · F-0600 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.

Why it matters: Abuse and neglect cause direct physical and emotional harm and are among the most serious failures a nursing home can have.

Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.

Corrected: Sep 19, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Sep 19, 2024 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.

Corrected: Sep 19, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (27)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Jan 8, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents' personal and medical information private and confidential.
Nov 5, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents' personal and medical information private and confidential. · from a complaint
Nov 5, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections. · from a complaint
Sep 19, 2024▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint
Sep 19, 2024▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Sep 19, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not run an ongoing quality assurance committee that reviews care problems and creates plans to fix them. · from a complaint
Aug 1, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Aug 1, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · from a complaint
Aug 1, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility's menus did not meet residents' nutritional needs, or were not prepared in advance, followed as written, kept up to date, or reviewed by a dietician. · from a complaint
Aug 1, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · from a complaint
Aug 1, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility allowed residents to lose the ability to do daily activities — like bathing, dressing, and eating — when there was no medical reason for the decline. Good care helps residents keep the abilities they have. · from a complaint
Aug 1, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Aug 1, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration.
Aug 1, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Aug 1, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not prepare and serve food in a form that meets each resident's individual needs — for example, chopped, pureed, or softened food for residents with chewing or swallowing problems.
Aug 1, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not run an ongoing quality assurance committee that reviews care problems and creates plans to fix them.
Aug 1, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Mar 2, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Mar 2, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
Mar 2, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care.
Mar 2, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not enter each resident's assessment information into the required format and send it to the state within 7 days of completing the assessment, as the rules require.
Mar 2, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not properly complete the required screening (called PASARR) that identifies whether a person entering a nursing home has a mental illness or intellectual disability and needs specialized services.
Mar 2, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Mar 2, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline.
Mar 2, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Mar 2, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
Mar 2, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not run an ongoing quality assurance committee that reviews care problems and creates plans to fix them.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (11 → 1).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
2023100E
2024142J ▲
202520D
202610D

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

1 fine totaling $64,981, plus 1 Medicare payment denial period.

DateTypeAmount / length
Aug 1, 2024Fine$64,981
Aug 1, 2024Payment Denial5 days from Oct 30, 2024

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityFlorida avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.554.033.95bottom 20% in Florida; bottom 39% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.590.760.69bottom 38% in Florida; top 49% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.243.683.50bottom 17% in Florida; bottom 44% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.590.530.48top 31% in Florida; top 24% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)18.741.445.8top 5% in Florida; top 2% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)21.746.042.9top 10% in Florida; top 17% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.50, RN 0.59, weekend 3.20. Staffing rating: 4/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 4/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Agrp 2011 TrustOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE11/08/2021
Aventura Op Holding LLCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%10/01/2021
Deborah Philipson 2011 Family TrustOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE11/08/2021
Kraus, AbrahamIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE11/08/2021
Paritzky, JeremieIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE11/08/2021
Philipson Family Limited Liability Company, LLCOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE11/08/2021
Agrp 2011 TrustOrganizationTrustee of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE11/08/2021
Agrp 2011 TrustOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE11/08/2021
Bengio, JacobIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE11/08/2021
Cheriscar, WinieIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE08/27/2024
Cheriscar, WinieIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE08/27/2024
Deborah Philipson 2011 Family TrustOrganizationTrustee of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE11/08/2021
Deborah Philipson 2011 Family TrustOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE11/08/2021
Kraus, AbrahamIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE11/08/2021
Kraus, AbrahamIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE11/08/2021
Ojeda, ManuelIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE08/01/2023
Paritzky, JeremieIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE11/08/2021
Philipson Family Limited Liability Company, LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE11/08/2021
Philipson, BentIndividualIndividual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/10/2025
Philipson, GabrielleIndividualIndividual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/16/2025

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
VI at Aventura0.8 miAventura, FL★★★★★5/5
North Beach Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center1.2 miNorth Miami Beach, FL★★☆☆☆1/5
Serenity Bay Nursing and Rehabilitation Center1.5 miNorth Miami Beach, FL★★☆☆☆2/5
Palm Garden of Aventura1.6 miNorth Miami Beach, FL★★★★☆4/5
Aventura Rehab and Nursing Center2.4 miNorth Miami Beach, FL★★★☆☆3/5
Sierra Lakes Nursing & Rehabilitation Center2.9 miMiami, FL★☆☆☆☆1/5
Gardens Nursing and Rehab Center2.9 miMiami, FL★★☆☆☆1/5abuseSFF
The Lilac at Silver Palms2.9 miNorth Miami, FL★★★★☆3/5
North Dade Nursing and Rehabilitation Center3.7 miNorth Miami, FL★★☆☆☆1/5
Hampton Court Nursing and Rehabilitation Center3.8 miNorth Miami Beach, FL★★★★★4/5
Claridge House Nursing and Rehabilitation Center4.1 miNorth Miami, FL★★☆☆☆2/5
Biscayne Health and Rehabilitation Center4.1 miNorth Miami, FL★★★★★4/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Aventura →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 105596.