FloridaWest Palm Beach

Lourdes-Noreen McKeen Residence for Geriatric Care

315 S Flagler Dr, West Palm Beach, FL 33401 · Palm Beach County · 132 certified beds · avg 126 residents/day · certified since Apr 1, 1982

Part of chain: CARMELITE SISTERS FOR THE AGED & INFIRM (9 facilities, chain avg rating 2.8★)

3/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
4.10
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

All citations in the current public record (30)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Sep 5, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Sep 5, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
Sep 5, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' right to make their own choices about their daily lives, such as when to wake up, what to eat, or how to spend their time.
Sep 5, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care.
Sep 5, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
Sep 5, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Sep 5, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration.
Sep 5, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility used feeding tubes without a valid medical reason or the resident's agreement, or did not provide proper care to residents who have feeding tubes.
Sep 5, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Sep 5, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist.
Sep 5, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time.
Sep 5, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Sep 5, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide food that accounts for each resident's allergies, intolerances, and personal preferences, or did not offer appealing alternatives.
Sep 5, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make sure special medical diets — like low-sodium or diabetic diets — were properly ordered by the resident's doctor or managed by a qualified dietitian as state law allows.
May 9, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups.
May 9, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint
May 9, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Feb 16, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
Feb 16, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Feb 16, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility used feeding tubes without a valid medical reason or the resident's agreement, or did not provide proper care to residents who have feeding tubes.
Feb 16, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have enough nursing staff each day to meet every resident's needs, or did not have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift. Adequate staffing is one of the strongest predictors of good care.
Feb 16, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time.
Feb 16, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Feb 16, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make sure special medical diets — like low-sodium or diabetic diets — were properly ordered by the resident's doctor or managed by a qualified dietitian as state law allows.
Feb 16, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have a working program to monitor how antibiotics are used. Tracking antibiotic use helps make sure these drugs are given only when needed and remain effective.
Feb 16, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures for offering residents flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
Feb 16, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not educate residents and staff about COVID-19 vaccination, offer the vaccine to those eligible after that education, or properly document everyone's vaccination status.
Feb 16, 2023C · Minimal risk, facility-wideThe facility did not give residents (and their representatives and the ombudsman, a state advocate for residents) proper advance notice before a transfer or discharge, including information about their right to appeal.
Feb 16, 2023C · Minimal risk, facility-wideThe facility did not report COVID-19 data to residents and their families as required. Facilities must keep residents and families informed about COVID-19 cases.
Feb 16, 2023C · Minimal risk, facility-wideThe facility did not perform required COVID-19 testing on residents and staff.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (3 → 14).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
2023130D
202430D
2025140E

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityFlorida avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)4.104.033.95top 32% in Florida; top 35% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours1.120.760.69top 13% in Florida; top 12% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.733.683.50top 33% in Florida; top 32% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.850.530.48top 13% in Florida; top 9% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)28.841.445.8top 20% in Florida; top 12% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)13.346.042.9top 4% in Florida; top 7% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.98, RN 1.08, weekend 3.62. Staffing rating: 5/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 1/5

Who owns this facility

Non profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Clarke, JohnIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2024
Cody, MaryIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2021
Daly, BethIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2021
Dimaria, LillianIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2021
Flynn, KathleenIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2021
Fortier, DanielIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE06/17/2020
Gathers, PatriciaIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2021
Heery, MaryIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2021
Lynch, PatriciaIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE03/11/2023
Mack, DianeIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2021
Mack, DianeIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2021
McDonough, MaureenIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2021
McMahon, JohnIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2021
Pereira, MaryIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2021
Randall, DianeIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2021
Rogers, MaryIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2021
Schneider, ThomasIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2024
The Carmelite System INCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2023
The Carmelite System INCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/04/2025

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Palm Garden of West Palm Beach1.9 miWest Palm Beach, FL★★★☆☆3/5
Lakeside Health Center2.0 miWest Palm Beach, FL★★★★☆4/5
Darcy Hall of Life Care2.8 miWest Palm Beach, FL★★☆☆☆1/5abuse
Colonial Skilled Nursing Facility LLC2.9 miWest Palm Beach, FL★★★☆☆3/5
Westgate Health and Rehabilitation Center3.1 miWest Palm Beach, FL★★★☆☆3/5
Rehabilitation Center of the Palm Beaches, the4.1 miWest Palm Beach, FL★★★★☆4/5
Joseph L Morse Health Center INC the4.7 miWest Palm Beach, FL★★★★★5/5
Aviata at West Palm Beach4.8 miWest Palm Beach, FL★★☆☆☆1/5abuse
Beach Breeze Rehab and Care Center4.9 miWest Palm Beach, FL★★☆☆☆2/5
Avante at Lake Worth, INC.5.1 miLake Worth, FL★☆☆☆☆1/5
North Lake Care Center and Rehab5.9 miLake Park, FL★★★★☆3/5
Edward J Healey Rehabilitation and Nursing Center6.1 miRiviera Beach, FL★★★★★4/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in West Palm Beach →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 105420.