How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
Medicana Nursing and Rehab Center
1710 Lake Worth Road, Lake Worth, FL 33460 (opens Google Maps) · Palm Beach County · (561) 582-5331· 116 certified beds · avg 77 residents/day · certified since Jan 1, 1973 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: SOVEREIGN HEALTHCARE HOLDINGS (43 facilities, chain avg rating 3.7★)
3/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
inspected Jan 16, 2025
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
4.10
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)
Every record stays on this page.
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Inspection findings in the public record
Showing the latest 3 of 14 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not maintain an effective pest control program to prevent or deal with mice, insects, or other pests. · from a complaint F-0925
The facility did not keep residents' personal and medical information private and confidential. F-0583
The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. F-0656
View all 14 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 10, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not maintain an effective pest control program to prevent or deal with mice, insects, or other pests. · from a complaint · F-0925 |
| Jan 16, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep residents' personal and medical information private and confidential. · F-0583 |
| Jan 16, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| Jan 16, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · F-0684 |
| Jan 16, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689 |
| Jan 16, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not make sure residents actually saw their doctor face-to-face at all required visits. Doctors must examine nursing home residents in person on a regular schedule. · F-0712 |
| Jan 16, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not arrange hospice services for a resident who needed them, or help the resident move to a facility that could arrange hospice. Hospice provides comfort-focused care for people nearing the end of life. · F-0849 |
| Jan 16, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not run an ongoing quality assurance committee that reviews care problems and creates plans to fix them. · F-0867 |
| Jan 16, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Jan 16, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have a working program to monitor how antibiotics are used. Tracking antibiotic use helps make sure these drugs are given only when needed and remain effective. · F-0881 |
| Jan 16, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | When a resident had a planned discharge, the facility did not make sure the necessary information was communicated to the resident and to the doctors or facility taking over their care. · from a complaint · F-0661 |
| Sep 14, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| Sep 14, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections. · F-0690 |
| Sep 14, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide timely, quality laboratory tests to meet residents' needs. · F-0770 |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (3 → 9).
All citationsSerious citations (G–L)
2023
All citations: 3
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2025
All citations: 11
Serious citations (G–L): 0
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 3 | 0 | D |
| 2025 | 11 | 0 | D |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
What these staffing numbers mean →
This facilityFlorida averageU.S. average
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)
This facility: 4.10
Florida average: 4.03
U.S. average: 3.95
Registered Nurse hours
This facility: 0.59
Florida average: 0.76
U.S. average: 0.69
Weekend total nurse staffing
This facility: 3.58
Florida average: 3.68
U.S. average: 3.50
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Florida avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 4.10 | 4.03 | 3.95 | top 32% in Florida; top 36% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.59 | 0.76 | 0.69 | bottom 38% in Florida; top 49% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 3.58 | 3.68 | 3.50 | top 44% in Florida; top 38% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.23 | 0.53 | 0.48 | bottom 9% in Florida; bottom 18% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 35.6 | 41.4 | 45.8 | top 34% in Florida; top 25% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 38.5 | 46.0 | 42.9 | top 35% in Florida; top 44% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.80, RN 0.55, weekend 3.33.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.80 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 4/5.
Quality measures: assessments & claims
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5
Costs & payment
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Medicana Nursing and Rehab Center. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Calculate a stay from a quote you receive
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Before you compare prices
- Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
- Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
- Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
Who owns this facility
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Corporation
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cronquist, Royce | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/31/2015 |
| Mangine, John | Individual | Direct Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/31/2015 |
| Bell, Charles | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/15/2016 |
| Bell, Charles | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/15/2016 |
| Centennial Bank | Organization | 5% or Greater Security Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/15/2014 |
| Chery, Dawn | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/08/2017 |
| Chery, Dawn | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/08/2017 |
| Cronquist, Royce | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/01/2018 |
| Cronquist, Royce | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/11/2017 |
| FL Medicana Holdings, LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Security Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/19/2009 |
| FL Medicana Holdings, LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/19/2009 |
| Forvis Mazars LLP | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2025 |
| Health Services Properties LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Security Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/19/2009 |
| Health Services Properties LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/19/2009 |
| Jones, Tamia | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/10/2022 |
| Jones, Tamia | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/10/2022 |
| Kaar, Susan | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/19/2009 |
| Kaar, Susan | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/19/2009 |
| Kelly, Michelle | Individual | Individual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/15/2025 |
| Kelly, Michelle | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/01/2018 |
Showing 20 of 31 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 11 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.
Other facilities in the same chain
CMS lists this facility under the chain Sovereign Healthcare Holdings — 43 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
- Metro West Nursing and Rehab Center — Orlando, FL · overall 4/5
- Moultrie Creek Nursing and Rehab Center — Saint Augustine, FL · overall 5/5
- Northdale Rehabilitation Center — Tampa, FL · overall 4/5
- Ocala Oaks Rehabilitation Center — Ocala, FL · overall 4/5
- Orange City Nursing and Rehab Center — Debary, FL · overall 4/5
- Palm City Nursing & Rehab Center — Palm City, FL · overall 5/5
- Parkview Rehabilitation Center at Winter Park — Winter Park, FL · overall 5/5
- Pinellas Point Nursing and Rehab Center — Saint Petersburg, FL · overall 2/5
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 42 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "How is pest control handled here, and when was the last treatment or inspection?"
- "How do you protect residents' privacy, both in their medical records and in day-to-day care?"
- "Can you show me an example care plan, and how are families included when it's created and updated?"
- "How do you make sure each resident's care follows the doctor's orders, and what changed after this citation?"
- "What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
- "How often does the attending doctor physically see each resident, and how is that documented?"
- "How do you coordinate hospice care, and can residents stay here while receiving it?"
- "How does your quality committee work, and can you give an example of a problem it recently identified and fixed?"
Also worth asking anywhere
- "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
- "Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
- "CMS reports 36% total nursing staff turnover here — who on the care team has been with you longest?"
- "The ownership record on file lists 31 owning or managing parties — who makes the decisions about staffing levels?"
- "Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"
Nearby facilities (12 closest of 49 within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Terraces of Lake Worth Care Center and Rehab | 0.6 mi | Lake Worth, FL | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Lake Worth Rehabilitation Center | 1.1 mi | Lake Worth, FL | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Avante at Lake Worth, INC. | 1.5 mi | Lake Worth, FL | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Finnish-American Village | 1.8 mi | Lake Worth, FL | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| VI at Lakeside Village | 2.5 mi | Lantana, FL | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Palm Beach Nursing Center | 2.7 mi | Lake Worth, FL | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Pine Trail Nursing and Rehab Center | 3.0 mi | Lake Worth, FL | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Beach Breeze Rehab and Care Center | 3.1 mi | West Palm Beach, FL | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Hamlin Place of Boynton Beach | 3.1 mi | Lantana, FL | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Aviata at Coral Bay | 3.6 mi | West Palm Beach, FL | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Aviata at West Palm Beach | 5.6 mi | West Palm Beach, FL | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
| Aviata at Greenacres | 5.6 mi | Green Acres, FL | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
Other facilities in the same county
CMS records place this facility in Palm Beach, FL — 54 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
- Menorah House — Boca Raton, FL · overall 3/5
- North Lake Care Center and Rehab — Lake Park, FL · overall 4/5
- Nursing Center at la Posada, the — Palm Beach Gardens, FL · overall 3/5
- Palm Garden of West Palm Beach — West Palm Beach, FL · overall 3/5
- Prosper Health and Rehabilitation Center — Palm Beach Gardens, FL · overall 2/5
- Rehabilitation Center of the Palm Beaches, the — West Palm Beach, FL · overall 4/5
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 105259.