2090 N Congress Ave, West Palm Beach, FL 33401 (opens Google Maps) · Palm Beach County · (561) 686-5100· 30 certified beds · avg 28 residents/day · certified since Jan 26, 1995 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Showing the latest 3 of 22 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. F-0657
The facility's menus did not meet residents' nutritional needs, or were not prepared in advance, followed as written, kept up to date, or reviewed by a dietician. F-0803
The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. F-0880
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| May 15, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · F-0657 |
| May 15, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility's menus did not meet residents' nutritional needs, or were not prepared in advance, followed as written, kept up to date, or reviewed by a dietician. · F-0803 |
| May 15, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| May 15, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups. · F-0558 |
| May 15, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care. · F-0578 |
| May 15, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility allowed residents to lose the ability to do daily activities — like bathing, dressing, and eating — when there was no medical reason for the decline. Good care helps residents keep the abilities they have. · F-0676 |
| May 15, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · F-0677 |
| May 15, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not prepare and serve food in a form that meets each resident's individual needs — for example, chopped, pureed, or softened food for residents with chewing or swallowing problems. · F-0805 |
| May 15, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not make sure special medical diets — like low-sodium or diabetic diets — were properly ordered by the resident's doctor or managed by a qualified dietitian as state law allows. · F-0808 |
| May 15, 2025 | C · Potential for minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not post its nurse staffing information every day. Nursing homes must publicly display how many nurses and aides are on duty each day. · F-0732 |
| Feb 1, 2024 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Feb 1, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not make sure its nurses and nurse aides had the skills and training needed to properly care for every resident. · F-0726 |
| Feb 1, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups. · F-0558 |
| Feb 1, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not honor residents' right to make their own choices about their daily lives, such as when to wake up, what to eat, or how to spend their time. · F-0561 |
| Feb 1, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time. · F-0759 |
| Feb 1, 2024 | C · Potential for minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not properly inform residents or their representatives about arbitration agreements — contracts that give up the right to sue in court — including their right to refuse to sign. · F-0847 |
| Oct 6, 2022 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · F-0657 |
| Oct 6, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide activities that meet residents' needs and interests. Nursing homes must offer meaningful activity programs, not just leave residents idle. · F-0679 |
| Oct 6, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration. · F-0692 |
| Oct 6, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not make sure its nurses and nurse aides had the skills and training needed to properly care for every resident. · F-0726 |
| Oct 6, 2022 | C · Potential for minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not create and follow a basic care plan covering a new resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of admission. The first days are when a new resident is most vulnerable. · F-0655 |
| Oct 6, 2022 | C · Potential for minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not dispose of garbage and refuse properly. · F-0814 |
Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (6 → 10).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 6 | 0 | E |
| 2024 | 6 | 0 | F |
| 2025 | 10 | 0 | E |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
2 fines totaling $5,395.
Every penalty CMS publishes for this facility in the 3-year window is listed —none excluded. The count and the dollar total come from two different CMS datasets and agree for this facility. Penalties older than the window are dropped by CMS before publication, not by us.
| Date | Type | Amount / length |
|---|---|---|
| Feb 1, 2024 | Fine | $1,378 |
| Feb 1, 2024 | Fine | $4,017 |
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Florida avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 4.18 | 4.03 | 3.95 | top 28% in Florida; top 33% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.68 | 0.76 | 0.69 | top 48% in Florida; top 38% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 3.88 | 3.68 | 3.50 | top 23% in Florida; top 26% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.63 | 0.53 | 0.48 | top 26% in Florida; top 20% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 43.3 | 41.4 | 45.8 | bottom 46% in Florida; top 45% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 72.7 | 46.0 | 42.9 | bottom 9% in Florida; bottom 9% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.74, RN 0.61, weekend 3.48.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.74 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 4/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Colonial Skilled Nursing Facility LLC. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Corporation
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Calm SNF PBC, LLC | Organization | Direct Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/01/2021 |
| Kaneti, Ricki | Individual | Direct Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/01/2021 |
| Beal, Barbara | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/29/2025 |
| Greystone Servicing Company, LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company | Organization | 5% or Greater Mortgage Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/30/2021 |
| Kaneti, Ricki | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/29/2021 |
| Lagrange, Lloyd | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/29/2025 |
| Lecomte, Richard | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/30/2021 |
All 7 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Westgate Health and Rehabilitation Center | 0.3 mi | West Palm Beach, FL | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Darcy Hall of Life Care | 1.4 mi | West Palm Beach, FL | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
| Palm Garden of West Palm Beach | 1.4 mi | West Palm Beach, FL | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Lakeside Health Center | 1.4 mi | West Palm Beach, FL | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Joseph L Morse Health Center INC the | 1.8 mi | West Palm Beach, FL | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Rehabilitation Center of the Palm Beaches, the | 2.0 mi | West Palm Beach, FL | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Lourdes-Noreen McKeen Residence for Geriatric Care | 2.9 mi | West Palm Beach, FL | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Edward J Healey Rehabilitation and Nursing Center | 3.7 mi | Riviera Beach, FL | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Aviata at West Palm Beach | 4.0 mi | West Palm Beach, FL | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
| North Lake Care Center and Rehab | 4.5 mi | Lake Park, FL | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Beach Breeze Rehab and Care Center | 5.5 mi | West Palm Beach, FL | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Aviata at Greenacres | 6.1 mi | Green Acres, FL | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
CMS records place this facility in Palm Beach, FL — 54 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 105875.
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details