How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
200 Washington Ave Ext, Albany, NY 12203 (opens Google Maps) · Albany County · (518) 456-2000· 302 certified beds · avg 286 residents/day · certified since Jun 20, 1978 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: CARMELITE SISTERS FOR THE AGED & INFIRM (9 facilities, chain avg rating 2.8★)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
▲ Immediate jeopardy, isolated · Dec 23, 2021 · F-0689
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.
Severity (J): Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety was cited. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Dec 15, 2021 (Past Non-Compliance)
Showing the latest 3 of 26 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time. F-0759
The facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication. · from a complaint F-0760
The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint F-0609
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Nov 8, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time. · F-0759 |
| Nov 8, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication. · from a complaint · F-0760 |
| Nov 8, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint · F-0609 |
| Nov 8, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not reassess a resident after a significant change in their condition, such as a sudden decline in health. A full new assessment is required when a resident's condition changes in a major way. · F-0637 |
| Nov 8, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · F-0657 |
| Nov 8, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility allowed residents to lose the ability to do daily activities — like bathing, dressing, and eating — when there was no medical reason for the decline. Good care helps residents keep the abilities they have. · F-0676 |
| Nov 8, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · F-0677 |
| Nov 8, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · F-0695 |
| Nov 8, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Jan 3, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication. · from a complaint · F-0760 |
| Dec 23, 2021 | ▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689 |
| Dec 23, 2021 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Dec 23, 2021 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep residents' personal and medical information private and confidential. · F-0583 |
| Dec 23, 2021 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · F-0609 |
| Dec 23, 2021 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits. · F-0758 |
| Oct 10, 2019 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| Oct 10, 2019 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Oct 10, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not give residents proper notice about what Medicare or Medicaid covers, or about charges the resident might owe for services that aren't covered. · F-0582 |
| Oct 10, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility used physical restraints — devices that limit a resident's movement — when they weren't needed for medical treatment. · F-0604 |
| Oct 10, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not coordinate resident assessments with the state's pre-admission screening program for mental illness and intellectual disabilities, or failed to refer residents for the special services they need. · F-0644 |
| Oct 10, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide activities that meet residents' needs and interests. Nursing homes must offer meaningful activity programs, not just leave residents idle. · F-0679 |
| Oct 10, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689 |
| Oct 10, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems. · F-0756 |
| Oct 10, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have a policy covering how food brought in by family and visitors is used and stored safely. · F-0813 |
| Oct 10, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have a working program to monitor how antibiotics are used. Tracking antibiotic use helps make sure these drugs are given only when needed and remain effective. · F-0881 |
| Oct 10, 2019 | C · Potential for minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · F-0550 |
Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (5 → 9).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 11 | 0 | E |
| 2021 | 5 | 1 | J ▲ |
| 2024 | 10 | 0 | E |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | New York avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 4.00 | 3.58 | 3.95 | top 25% in New York; top 39% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.42 | 0.68 | 0.69 | bottom 18% in New York; bottom 25% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 3.69 | 3.13 | 3.50 | top 18% in New York; top 34% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.22 | 0.48 | 0.48 | bottom 19% in New York; bottom 15% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 33.5 | 40.3 | 45.8 | top 39% in New York; top 21% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 30.4 | 39.8 | 42.9 | top 30% in New York; top 30% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.88, RN 0.41, weekend 3.58.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.88 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 4/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Teresian House Nursing Home Co INC. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
Non profit - Corporation
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alvarez, Kelsey | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/30/2021 |
| Alvarez, Kelsey | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/30/2021 |
| Antenucci, Angiola | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/01/2023 |
| Antenucci, Angiola | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/01/2023 |
| Antenucci, Angiola | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/01/2023 |
| Antenucci, Angiola | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/01/2023 |
| Arcuri, Michael | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/10/2025 |
| Arcuri, Michael | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/10/2025 |
| Austin, Coleen | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/22/2021 |
| Austin, Coleen | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/22/2021 |
| Baumes, Eric | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/14/1996 |
| Baumes, Eric | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/14/1996 |
| Bertazzo, Helene | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/12/2020 |
| Bertazzo, Helene | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/12/2020 |
| Bonadio & Co LLP | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/01/2022 |
| Bonadio & Co LLP | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/12/2025 |
| Bowks, Harvey | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2005 |
| Bowks, Harvey | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2005 |
| Bowks, Harvey | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2005 |
| Bowks, Harvey | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2005 |
Showing 20 of 108 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 88 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.
CMS lists this facility under the chain Carmelite Sisters for the Aged & Infirm — 9 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Daughters of Sarah Nursing Center | 0.0 mi | Albany, NY | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Eddy Village Green at Beverwyck | 2.6 mi | Slingerlands, NY | ★★★★☆ | 2/5 | abuse |
| St Peters Nursing and Rehabilitation Center | 2.9 mi | Albany, NY | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Shaker Place Rehabilitation and Nursing Center | 3.7 mi | Albany, NY | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Our Lady of Mercy Life Center | 4.0 mi | Guilderland, NY | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
| Hudson Park Rehabilitation and Nursing Center | 4.1 mi | Albany, NY | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| St Margarets Center | 4.1 mi | Albany, NY | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Delmar Center for Rehabilitation and Nursing | 4.8 mi | Delmar, NY | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Troy Center for Rehabilitation and Nursing | 6.7 mi | Troy, NY | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
| The Grand Rehabilitation and Nrsg at Guilderland | 6.8 mi | Altamont, NY | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | SFF |
| Kingsway Arms Nursing Center INC | 7.2 mi | Schenectady, NY | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Van Rensselaer Manor | 7.4 mi | Troy, NY | ★☆☆☆☆ | 2/5 | abuse |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
CMS records place this facility in Albany, NY — 11 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 335627.
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details