How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
Long Beach Nursing and Rehabilitation Center
375 East Bay Drive, Long Beach, NY 11561 (opens Google Maps) · Nassau County · (516) 897-1220· 200 certified beds · avg 134 residents/day · certified since Nov 11, 1974 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: CASSENA CARE (13 facilities, chain avg rating 4.2★)
3/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
inspected Mar 21, 2025
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
3.05
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)
Every record stays on this page.
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Inspection findings in the public record
Showing the latest 3 of 24 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. F-0761
The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. F-0812
The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. F-0880
View all 24 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 21, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| Mar 21, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Mar 21, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Mar 21, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · F-0686 |
| Mar 21, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline. · F-0688 |
| Mar 21, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility used feeding tubes without a valid medical reason or the resident's agreement, or did not provide proper care to residents who have feeding tubes. · F-0693 |
| Mar 21, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have enough nursing staff each day to meet every resident's needs, or did not have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift. Adequate staffing is one of the strongest predictors of good care. · from a complaint · F-0725 |
| Mar 21, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems. · F-0756 |
| Mar 21, 2025 | C · Potential for minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not post its nurse staffing information every day. Nursing homes must publicly display how many nurses and aides are on duty each day. · F-0732 |
| Sep 13, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not make sure the resident's doctor reviewed their care and wrote, signed, and dated progress notes and orders at each required visit. · F-0711 |
| Sep 13, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not make sure its nurses and nurse aides had the skills and training needed to properly care for every resident. · F-0726 |
| Sep 13, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems. · F-0756 |
| Sep 13, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Jul 13, 2021 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Jul 13, 2021 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not keep all essential equipment working safely — things like heating and cooling systems, kitchen equipment, and medical devices. · F-0908 |
| Jul 13, 2021 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not honor residents' right to make their own choices about their daily lives, such as when to wake up, what to eat, or how to spend their time. · F-0561 |
| Jul 13, 2021 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away. · F-0580 |
| Jul 13, 2021 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| Jul 13, 2021 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · F-0657 |
| Jul 13, 2021 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · F-0684 |
| Jul 13, 2021 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · F-0686 |
| Jul 13, 2021 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689 |
| Jul 13, 2021 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not make sure its nurses and nurse aides had the skills and training needed to properly care for every resident. · F-0726 |
| Jul 13, 2021 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (4 → 9).
All citationsSerious citations (G–L)
2021
All citations: 11
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2023
All citations: 4
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2025
All citations: 9
Serious citations (G–L): 0
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 11 | 0 | E |
| 2023 | 4 | 0 | D |
| 2025 | 9 | 0 | E |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
What these staffing numbers mean →
This facilityNew York averageU.S. average
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)
This facility: 3.05
New York average: 3.58
U.S. average: 3.95
Registered Nurse hours
This facility: 1.15
New York average: 0.68
U.S. average: 0.69
Weekend total nurse staffing
This facility: 2.76
New York average: 3.13
U.S. average: 3.50
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | New York avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.05 | 3.58 | 3.95 | bottom 28% in New York; bottom 16% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 1.15 | 0.68 | 0.69 | top 7% in New York; top 11% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 2.76 | 3.13 | 3.50 | bottom 34% in New York; bottom 19% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 1.11 | 0.48 | 0.48 | top 4% in New York; top 4% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 44.2 | 40.3 | 45.8 | bottom 39% in New York; top 48% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 36.7 | 39.8 | 42.9 | top 47% in New York; top 41% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.47, RN 1.31, weekend 3.14.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.47 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 3/5.
Quality measures: assessments & claims
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5
Costs & payment
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Long Beach Nursing and Rehabilitation Center. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Calculate a stay from a quote you receive
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Before you compare prices
- Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
- Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
- Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
Who owns this facility
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Limited Liability company
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debenedictis, Pasquale | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 23% | 12/18/2019 |
| Friedman, Leopold | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 46% | 12/18/2019 |
| Rutenberg, Solomon | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 9% | 03/08/2017 |
| Solovey, Alex | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 23% | 12/18/2019 |
| Debenedictis, Pasquale | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/18/2019 |
| Derosa, Anthony | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/29/2016 |
| Friedman, Leopold | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/18/2019 |
| Rutenberg, Solomon | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/08/2017 |
| Solovey, Alex | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/18/2019 |
All 9 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.
Other facilities in the same chain
CMS lists this facility under the chain Cassena Care — 13 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
- Margaret Tietz Center for Nursing Care INC — Jamaica, NY · overall 5/5
- Morningside Nursing and Rehabilitation Center — Bronx, NY · overall 5/5
- Peninsula Nursing and Rehabilitation Center — Far Rockaway, NY · overall 2/5
- Sea Crest Nursing and Rehabilitation Center — Brooklyn, NY · overall 4/5
- Shore View Nursing & Rehabilitation Center — Brooklyn, NY · overall 5/5
- Upper East Side Rehabilitation and Nursing Center — New York City, NY · overall 5/5
- West Village Rehabilitation and Nursing Center — New York, NY · overall 5/5
- Workmens Circle Multicare Center — Bronx, NY · overall 5/5
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 12 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "Can you show me how medications are stored and secured on the units, including controlled drugs?"
- "What did your most recent kitchen inspection find, and can I see how food is stored and prepared?"
- "Who leads your infection prevention program, and how do you make sure staff follow practices like hand hygiene every day?"
- "How do you prevent bedsores for residents who can't move themselves, and how often are at-risk residents repositioned?"
- "What do you do daily to keep residents moving, and how do you help residents at risk of losing mobility?"
- "How do you decide when a feeding tube is truly needed, and how do staff care for residents who have one?"
- "What is your nurse and aide staffing ratio on each shift, including nights and weekends?"
- "Does a pharmacist review every resident's medications and chart monthly, and how are their concerns acted on?"
Also worth asking anywhere
- "Your weekend nurse staffing is reported below the New York midpoint — how does the weekend schedule differ from a weekday?"
- "Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
- "CMS reports 44% total nursing staff turnover here — who on the care team has been with you longest?"
- "Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"
Nearby facilities (12 closest of 144 within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Grand Rehabilitation and Nursing at South Poin | 0.5 mi | Island Park, NY | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Park Avenue Extended Care Facility | 0.8 mi | Long Beach, NY | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Beach Terrace Care Center | 1.7 mi | Long Beach, NY | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Grandell Rehabilitation and Nu | 1.7 mi | Long Beach, NY | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Oceanside Care Center INC | 3.2 mi | Oceanside, NY | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| The Five Towns Premier Rehabilitation & Nursing Ce | 3.9 mi | Woodmere, NY | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Lynbrook Restorative Therapy and Nursing | 4.0 mi | Lunbrook, NY | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Mount Sinai South Nassau T C U | 4.2 mi | Oceanside, NY | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| The Grand Pavilion for Rehab & Nursing at Rockvill | 4.8 mi | Rockville Centre, NY | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Rockville Skilled Nursing & Rehabilitation Center, | 4.8 mi | Rockville Center, NY | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Oceanview Nursing & Rehabilitation Care Center | 4.8 mi | Far Rockaway, NY | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| West Lawrence Care Center, L L C | 4.8 mi | Far Rockaway, NY | ★☆☆☆☆ | 2/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
Other facilities in the same county
CMS records place this facility in Nassau, NY — 36 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
- Mayfair Care Center — Hempstead, NY · overall 1/5
- Meadowbrook Care Center — Freeport, NY · overall 5/5
- Nassau Rehabilitation & Nursing Center — Hempstead, NY · overall 3/5
- North Shore - Lij Orzac Center for Rehabilitation — Valley Stream, NY · overall 3/5
- Northwell Health Stern Family Center for Rehabilit — Manhasset, NY · overall 5/5
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 335432.
This page is the printable visit checklist. If your browser did not open the print dialog automatically, use File → Print (Ctrl/⌘-P).