How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
260 19 Nassau Boulevard, Little Neck, NY 11362 (opens Google Maps) · Queens County · (718) 423-6400· 120 certified beds · avg 103 residents/day · certified since Sep 1, 1976 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: OPTIMA CARE (8 facilities, chain avg rating 3.0★)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★☆☆☆☆1/5 · CMS overall rating: 2/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
▲ Immediate jeopardy, isolated · May 18, 2026 · F-0610 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do.
Why it matters: When allegations aren't investigated, harm to residents can continue unchecked.
Severity (J): Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety was cited. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Jun 25, 2026 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
Showing the latest 3 of 17 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint F-0609
The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint F-0880
The facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. · from a complaint F-0610
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 1, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint · F-0609 |
| Jun 1, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint · F-0880 |
| May 18, 2026 | ▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, isolated | The facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. · from a complaint · F-0610 |
| Aug 28, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not treat residents with respect and dignity, or did not let them keep and use their own personal belongings. · F-0557 |
| Aug 28, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not create and follow a basic care plan covering a new resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of admission. The first days are when a new resident is most vulnerable. · F-0655 |
| Aug 28, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| Aug 28, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline. · F-0688 |
| Aug 28, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not post its nurse staffing information every day. Nursing homes must publicly display how many nurses and aides are on duty each day. · F-0732 |
| Aug 28, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Aug 28, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint · F-0609 |
| Oct 18, 2022 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Oct 18, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility used physical restraints — devices that limit a resident's movement — when they weren't needed for medical treatment. · F-0604 |
| Oct 18, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · F-0641 |
| Oct 18, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not create and follow a basic care plan covering a new resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of admission. The first days are when a new resident is most vulnerable. · F-0655 |
| Oct 18, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · F-0657 |
| Oct 18, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · F-0755 |
| Nov 18, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (6 → 6).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 1 | 0 | D |
| 2022 | 6 | 0 | F |
| 2024 | 7 | 0 | D |
| 2026 | 3 | 1 | J ▲ |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | New York avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.40 | 3.58 | 3.95 | bottom 49% in New York; bottom 32% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.74 | 0.68 | 0.69 | top 28% in New York; top 33% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 3.17 | 3.13 | 3.50 | top 38% in New York; bottom 40% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.63 | 0.48 | 0.48 | top 20% in New York; top 21% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 16.9 | 40.3 | 45.8 | top 3% in New York; top 2% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 33.3 | 39.8 | 42.9 | top 38% in New York; top 33% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.58, RN 0.78, weekend 3.34.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.58 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 4/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Little Neck Care Center. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Corporation
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mendel, Boris | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 5% | 01/24/2018 |
| Mendel, Eric | Individual | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 100% | 01/24/2018 |
| Rovt, Alexander | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 90% | 01/24/2018 |
| Avinari, Ilana | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/24/2018 |
| Avinari, Ilana | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/24/2018 |
| Boris Mendel Family 2012 Irrevocable Trust | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/23/2025 |
| Emm Healthcare Group LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/24/2018 |
| Mendel, Eric | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/24/2018 |
| Mendel, Eric | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/24/2018 |
| Mendel, Eric | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/24/2018 |
| RM Holdings Little Neck, LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/24/2018 |
| Rovt 2011 Family Trust | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/23/2025 |
| Staiano, Steve | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/21/2022 |
| Staiano, Steve | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/15/2025 |
| Younesi, Peyman | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/01/2019 |
| Younesi, Peyman | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/15/2025 |
All 16 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.
CMS lists this facility under the chain Optima Care — 8 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Parker Jewish Institute for Health Care & Rehab | 1.4 mi | New Hyde Park, NY | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| New Glen Oaks Nursing Home, INC | 1.4 mi | Glen Oaks, NY | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Highfield Gardens Care Center of Great Neck | 1.6 mi | Great Neck, NY | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Northwell Health Stern Family Center for Rehabilit | 1.7 mi | Manhasset, NY | ★★★★★ | 3/5 | |
| The Grand Rehabilitation and Nursing at Great Neck | 1.9 mi | Great Neck, NY | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Windsor Park Rehab & Nursing Center | 2.5 mi | Queens Village, NY | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Ozanam Hall of Queens Nursing Home INC | 2.5 mi | Bayside, NY | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| St Mary's Hospital for Children | 2.8 mi | Bayside, NY | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Hollis Park Manor Nursing Home | 3.7 mi | Hollis, NY | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Holliswood Center for Rehabilitation and Healthcar | 3.7 mi | Hollis, NY | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Queen of Peace Residence | 3.9 mi | Queens Village, NY | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| The Grand Rehabilitation and Nursing at Queens | 4.2 mi | Whitesone, NY | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
CMS records place this facility in Queens, NY — 56 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 335434.
This page is the printable visit checklist. If your browser did not open the print dialog automatically, use File → Print (Ctrl/⌘-P).
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details