Valley View Skilled Nursing and Rehabilitation

4430 Talbot Road South, Renton, WA 98055 (opens Google Maps) · King County · (425) 226-7500· 136 certified beds · avg 104 residents/day · certified since Jun 1, 1970 · Medicare and Medicaid certified

Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →

Part of chain: VERTICAL HEALTH SERVICES (15 facilities, chain avg rating 1.9★)

3/5

Health inspection rating (on-site)

inspected Mar 24, 2026

Serious findings on record

Fines, last 3 years

3.68

Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

New to these records? How to read an inspection report →

Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5 · how star ratings work →

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.

Inspection findings in the public record

Showing the latest 3 of 59 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.

May 28, 2026E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern
The facility did not keep all essential equipment working safely — things like heating and cooling systems, kitchen equipment, and medical devices. · from a complaint F-0908
Mar 24, 2026E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern
The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. F-0584
Mar 24, 2026E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern
The facility did not provide required paperwork or notices about a resident's needs, their right to appeal a transfer or discharge, or the facility's bed-hold policy (how long a bed is saved during a hospital stay). F-0628

View all 59 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.

Date	Severity	What the facility was cited for
May 28, 2026	E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern	The facility did not keep all essential equipment working safely — things like heating and cooling systems, kitchen equipment, and medical devices. · from a complaint · F-0908
Mar 24, 2026	E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern	The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · F-0584
Mar 24, 2026	E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern	The facility did not provide required paperwork or notices about a resident's needs, their right to appeal a transfer or discharge, or the facility's bed-hold policy (how long a bed is saved during a hospital stay). · F-0628
Mar 24, 2026	E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern	The facility did not properly complete the required screening (called PASARR) that identifies whether a person entering a nursing home has a mental illness or intellectual disability and needs specialized services. · F-0645
Mar 24, 2026	E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern	The facility did not provide safe, appropriate care for residents who need dialysis — the treatment that filters the blood when kidneys fail. · F-0698
Mar 24, 2026	E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern	The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761
Mar 24, 2026	E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern	The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880
Mar 24, 2026	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not make sure residents were fully informed about their own health, care, and treatments in a way they could understand. · F-0552
Mar 24, 2026	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656
Mar 24, 2026	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · F-0658
Mar 24, 2026	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · F-0684
Mar 24, 2026	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689
Dec 23, 2025	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · from a complaint · F-0686
May 9, 2025	E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern	The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · from a complaint · F-0812
Dec 13, 2024	F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread	The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812
Dec 13, 2024	E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern	The facility did not give residents the required written notice of their rights, the facility's rules, the services offered, and what those services cost. · F-0572
Dec 13, 2024	E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern	The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · F-0584
Dec 13, 2024	E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern	The facility's menus did not meet residents' nutritional needs, or were not prepared in advance, followed as written, kept up to date, or reviewed by a dietician. · F-0803
Dec 13, 2024	E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern	The facility did not serve food and drinks that were appetizing, attractive, and at a safe and pleasant temperature. · F-0804
Dec 13, 2024	E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern	The facility did not properly inform residents or their representatives about arbitration agreements — contracts that give up the right to sue in court — including their right to refuse to sign. · F-0847
Dec 13, 2024	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not honor residents' right to voice complaints without discrimination or retaliation, or did not have a working complaint process that resolves issues promptly. · F-0585
Dec 13, 2024	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · F-0609
Dec 13, 2024	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. · F-0610
Dec 13, 2024	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not give residents (and their representatives and the ombudsman, a state advocate for residents) proper advance notice before a transfer or discharge, including information about their right to appeal. · F-0623
Dec 13, 2024	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not give the resident or their representative written notice of how long it would hold the resident's bed during a hospital stay or approved leave. · F-0625
Dec 13, 2024	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · F-0657
Dec 13, 2024	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · F-0677
Dec 13, 2024	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · F-0684
Dec 13, 2024	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not help a resident get vision and hearing services — such as eye exams, glasses, hearing tests, or hearing aids. · F-0685
Dec 13, 2024	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · F-0686
Dec 13, 2024	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689
Dec 13, 2024	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · F-0755
Dec 13, 2024	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761
Dec 13, 2024	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not provide or arrange dental services for its residents. Nursing homes are responsible for making sure residents can get dental care. · F-0791
Dec 13, 2024	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · F-0842
Dec 13, 2024	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880
Dec 13, 2024	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not maintain an effective pest control program to prevent or deal with mice, insects, or other pests. · F-0925
Nov 1, 2024	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not electronically submit complete and accurate staffing information to the government, based on payroll and other verifiable records. · from a complaint · F-0851
Apr 23, 2024	E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern	The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint · F-0684
Aug 25, 2023	F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread	The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812
Aug 25, 2023	F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread	The facility did not conduct and document a facility-wide assessment of what staff, supplies, and resources it needs to care for its residents properly — during everyday operations, nights, weekends, and emergencies. · F-0838
Aug 25, 2023	E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern	The facility did not give residents the required written notice of their rights, the facility's rules, the services offered, and what those services cost. · F-0572
Aug 25, 2023	E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern	The facility did not give residents important notices in a format and language they can understand — for example, translated documents or accessible formats for those with vision or hearing loss. · F-0574
Aug 25, 2023	E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern	The facility did not make its inspection results easy for residents to see, or made it hard for residents to contact advocacy agencies like the ombudsman. · F-0577
Aug 25, 2023	E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern	The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · F-0584
Aug 25, 2023	E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern	The facility did not give residents (and their representatives and the ombudsman, a state advocate for residents) proper advance notice before a transfer or discharge, including information about their right to appeal. · F-0623
Aug 25, 2023	E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern	The facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration. · F-0692
Aug 25, 2023	E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern	The facility did not have enough nursing staff each day to meet every resident's needs, or did not have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift. Adequate staffing is one of the strongest predictors of good care. · F-0725
Aug 25, 2023	E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern	The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · F-0755
Aug 25, 2023	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not give residents reasonable access to and privacy in using ways to communicate, such as phones, mail, and email. Residents have the right to stay in touch with the outside world privately. · F-0576
Aug 25, 2023	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care. · F-0578
Aug 25, 2023	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not give residents proper notice about what Medicare or Medicaid covers, or about charges the resident might owe for services that aren't covered. · F-0582
Aug 25, 2023	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not properly complete the required screening (called PASARR) that identifies whether a person entering a nursing home has a mental illness or intellectual disability and needs specialized services. · F-0645
Aug 25, 2023	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility allowed residents to lose the ability to do daily activities — like bathing, dressing, and eating — when there was no medical reason for the decline. Good care helps residents keep the abilities they have. · F-0676
Aug 25, 2023	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · F-0677
Aug 25, 2023	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not provide activities that meet residents' needs and interests. Nursing homes must offer meaningful activity programs, not just leave residents idle. · F-0679
Aug 25, 2023	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline. · F-0688
Aug 25, 2023	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761
Aug 25, 2023	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not provide or arrange specialized rehabilitation services — such as physical, occupational, or speech therapy — for residents who needed them. · F-0825

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (23 → 11).

Citations by recorded inspection yearPublished citation counts, not a quality score · Source: CMS, 2026-08-01

All citationsSerious citations (G–L)

2023

2024

2025

2026

All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.

Year	Citations	Worst severity that year
2023	20	F
2024	25	F
2025	2	E
2026	12	E

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

How to file a complaint about care →

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

What these staffing numbers mean →

Nurse time, in contextAdjusted hours per resident per day · Source: CMS, 2026-08-01

This facilityWashington averageU.S. average

Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)

3.68

4.24

3.95

Registered Nurse hours

0.96

0.91

0.69

Weekend total nurse staffing

3.21

3.69

3.50

All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.

Measure	This facility	Washington avg	U.S. avg	Where it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)	3.68	4.24	3.95	bottom 23% in Washington; bottom 46% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours	0.96	0.91	0.69	top 34% in Washington; top 17% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing	3.21	3.69	3.50	bottom 27% in Washington; bottom 42% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)	0.81	0.67	0.48	top 25% in Washington; top 11% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)	38.0	45.1	45.8	top 32% in Washington; top 31% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)	28.0	45.4	42.9	top 18% in Washington; top 26% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.19, RN 1.10, weekend 3.66.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (4.19 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 4/5.

Quality measures: assessments & claims

Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.

Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: 2/5

Costs & payment

Price evidence · separate from quality

No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Valley View Skilled Nursing and Rehabilitation. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.

Calculate a stay from a quote you receive

Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.

Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.

Before you compare prices

Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.

Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price

Who owns this facility

How to read ownership records →

Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →

For profit - Limited Liability company

Owner / manager	Type	Role	Stake	Since
Miller, William	Individual	Indirect Ownership Interest	NOT APPLICABLE	09/01/2023
Vertical Health Services LLC	Organization	Indirect Ownership Interest	NOT APPLICABLE	09/01/2023
VHS Holdco LLC	Organization	Indirect Ownership Interest	NOT APPLICABLE	09/01/2023
VHS Ultimate Parent LLC	Organization	Indirect Ownership Interest	NOT APPLICABLE	09/01/2023
VHS Wa Opco Holdings LLC	Organization	Direct Ownership Interest	NOT APPLICABLE	09/01/2023
Chheda, Neel	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	12/05/2023
Chheda, Neel	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	04/09/2025
Kaur, Jasmeen	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	12/16/2024
Kaur, Jasmeen	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	04/23/2025
Miller, William	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	09/01/2023
Talbot Rd S I Consulting LLC	Organization	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	09/01/2023
Talbot Rd S I Consulting LLC	Organization	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	03/19/2025

All 12 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.

Other facilities in the same chain

CMS lists this facility under the chain Vertical Health Services — 15 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.

Advanced Care of St Joseph — Saint Joseph, MO · overall 1/5
Aegis Health and Rehabilitation — Wildwood, MO · overall 1/5
Alpine Breeze Health and Wellness — Raytown, MO · overall 2/5abuse
Aspen Point Health and Rehabilitation — Saint Charles, MO · overall 1/5
Athene Nursing and Rehabilitation — Town and Country, MO · overall 1/5abuse
Atrium Place Health and Rehabilitation — Saint Louis, MO · overall 1/5
Aurora Health and Rehabilitation — Rolla, MO · overall 2/5
Avalon View Health and Wellness — Liberty, MO · overall 3/5

Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 14 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.

Questions to ask on your visit

Full visit checklist →

Print visit checklist

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

"How do you inspect and maintain essential equipment, and how quickly are repairs made?"
"Can we tour the resident rooms, bathrooms, and common areas today, including areas not on the usual tour route?"
"What written notices do we get before any transfer or discharge, and what is your bed-hold policy?"
"How do you screen new residents for mental health and disability-related needs, and how do you provide the specialized services they require?"
"How do you coordinate and monitor care for residents who receive dialysis?"
"Can you show me how medications are stored and secured on the units, including controlled drugs?"
"Who leads your infection prevention program, and how do you make sure staff follow practices like hand hygiene every day?"
"How do you explain health changes and treatment options to residents and their families?"

Also worth asking anywhere

"Your weekend nurse staffing is reported below the Washington midpoint — how does the weekend schedule differ from a weekday?"
"Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
"CMS reports 38% total nursing staff turnover here — who on the care team has been with you longest?"
"Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"

Nearby facilities (12 closest of 54 within 20 miles)

Facility	Distance	City	Overall	Inspection
Cedar River Healthcare Center	0.7 mi	Renton, WA	★★★☆☆	2/5
Benson Heights Rehabilitation Center	2.7 mi	Kent, WA	★★★☆☆	2/5
Renton Health & Rehabilitation	3.0 mi	Renton, WA	★★☆☆☆	2/5
Puget Sound Transitional Care	5.0 mi	Des Moines, WA	★★☆☆☆	2/5
Wesley Homes Des Moines Health Center	5.6 mi	Des Moines, WA	★★★★★	4/5
Judson Park Health Center	6.2 mi	Des Moines, WA	★★★★★	3/5
Caroline Kline Galland Home	7.2 mi	Seattle, WA	★★★☆☆	2/5
Avamere Rehabilitation of Burien	7.3 mi	Burien, WA	★★☆☆☆	2/5
North Auburn Care	7.4 mi	Auburn, WA	★★☆☆☆	1/5
Kin on Health Care Center	8.5 mi	Seattle, WA	★★☆☆☆	2/5
Lea Hill Rehabilitation and Care Center	8.6 mi	Auburn, WA	★★★★☆	3/5
Briarwood at Timber Ridge	9.1 mi	Issaquah, WA	★★★★★	4/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

Other facilities in the same county

CMS records place this facility in King, WA — 47 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.

Washington Care Center — Seattle, WA · overall 2/5
Auburn Post Acute — Auburn, WA · overall 1/5abuseSFF
Avalon Care Center Federal Way, L.L.C. — Federal Way, WA · overall 4/5
Avamere Rehabilitation at Park West — Seattle, WA · overall 2/5
Avamere Rehabilitation of Issaquah — Issaquah, WA · overall 2/5
Avamere Rehabilitation of Shoreline — Seattle, WA · overall 2/5

Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.

All facilities in Renton →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 505202.