Sunrise Nursing & Rehabilitation
600 E Sunrise Drive, Raymore, MO 64083 · Cass County · 152 certified beds · avg 140 residents/day · certified since Nov 20, 1991
Part of chain: OPCO SKILLED MANAGEMENT (66 facilities, chain avg rating 2.3★)
2/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
1
Serious findings on record
$10,193
Fines, last 3 years
2.39
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.
Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)
▲ Actual harm, one-off · Apr 11, 2024 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.
Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.
Corrected: Apr 25, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
All citations in the current public record (34)
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| May 21, 2026 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not allow a resident's chosen representative — often a family member or someone with power of attorney — to exercise the resident's rights on their behalf. When a resident can't speak for themselves, their representative steps into that role. · from a complaint |
| Jun 26, 2025 | F · Potential for harm, facility-wide | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. |
| Jun 26, 2025 | F · Potential for harm, facility-wide | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. |
| Jun 26, 2025 | F · Potential for harm, facility-wide | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. |
| Jun 26, 2025 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft. These written safeguards are the foundation of resident protection. |
| Jun 26, 2025 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. |
| Jun 26, 2025 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. |
| Jun 26, 2025 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility was not properly licensed, or did not operate in compliance with federal, state, and local laws, regulations, and accepted professional standards. |
| Jun 26, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not make sure residents were fully informed about their own health, care, and treatments in a way they could understand. |
| Jun 26, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. |
| Jun 26, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections. |
| Jun 26, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. |
| Jun 26, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time. |
| Apr 11, 2024 | ▲ G · Actual harm, one-off | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint |
| Apr 11, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not honor residents' right to make their own choices about their daily lives, such as when to wake up, what to eat, or how to spend their time. · from a complaint |
| Oct 17, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint |
| Aug 7, 2023 | F · Potential for harm, facility-wide | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. |
| Aug 7, 2023 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft. These written safeguards are the foundation of resident protection. |
| Aug 7, 2023 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems. |
| Aug 7, 2023 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. |
| Aug 7, 2023 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not have a working program to monitor how antibiotics are used. Tracking antibiotic use helps make sure these drugs are given only when needed and remain effective. |
| Aug 7, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint |
| Aug 17, 2021 | F · Potential for harm, facility-wide | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. |
| Aug 17, 2021 | F · Potential for harm, facility-wide | The facility did not perform required COVID-19 testing on residents and staff. |
| Aug 17, 2021 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not honor residents' right to receive the visitors they choose, at the times they choose. |
| Aug 17, 2021 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. |
| Aug 17, 2021 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. |
| Aug 17, 2021 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not keep its building and grounds safe, functional, clean, and comfortable for residents, staff, and visitors. |
| Aug 17, 2021 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not allow residents to take their own medications when a clinical review showed they could do so safely. Residents have this right if their care team determines it's appropriate. |
| Aug 17, 2021 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. |
| Aug 17, 2021 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. |
| Aug 17, 2021 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. |
| Aug 17, 2021 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. |
| Aug 17, 2021 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not dispose of garbage and refuse properly. |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (6 → 12).
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 12 | 0 | F |
| 2023 | 7 | 0 | F |
| 2024 | 2 | 1 | G ▲ |
| 2025 | 12 | 0 | F |
| 2026 | 1 | 0 | D |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
1 fine totaling $10,193.
| Date | Type | Amount / length |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 11, 2024 | Fine | $10,193 |
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
| Measure | This facility | Missouri avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 2.39 | 3.66 | 3.95 | bottom 11% in Missouri; bottom 3% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.46 | 0.49 | 0.69 | top 41% in Missouri; bottom 32% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 2.12 | 3.22 | 3.50 | bottom 12% in Missouri; bottom 3% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.45 | 0.33 | 0.48 | top 13% in Missouri; top 39% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 43.5 | 56.0 | 45.8 | top 19% in Missouri; top 46% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 14.3 | 47.8 | 42.9 | top 7% in Missouri; top 7% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 2.72, RN 0.53, weekend 2.42. Staffing rating: 2/5.
Self-reported quality measures
Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.
Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5
Who owns this facility
For profit - Individual
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caliber Advisors LLC | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/12/2022 |
| Crestview Trust | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/12/2022 |
| El Dorado Nursing and Rehabilitation LLC | Organization | Direct Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/12/2022 |
| First Sweetzer Holdings LLC | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/12/2022 |
| Hatteras Investments LLC | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/12/2022 |
| Rimpau Holdings Trust | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/12/2022 |
| Sasem Investments LLC | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/12/2022 |
| 600 E Sunrise Drive Mo, LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Mortgage Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/12/2022 |
| 600 E Sunrise Drive Mo, LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/12/2022 |
| Catron, Michael | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/09/2023 |
| Catron, Michael | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/09/2023 |
| Emerald Property Partners LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Mortgage Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/12/2022 |
| Emerald Property Partners LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/12/2022 |
| Esdov Investments LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/12/2022 |
| First Sweetzer Holdings LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/12/2022 |
| Garetz, David | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/12/2022 |
| Gibraltar Trust | Organization | 5% or Greater Mortgage Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/12/2022 |
| Gibraltar Trust | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/12/2022 |
| Hagins, Elizabeth | Individual | Individual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/30/2025 |
| Hatteras Investments LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/12/2022 |
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
- "How do you involve a resident's representative in care decisions, and how quickly are they consulted?"
- "Can you show me how medications are stored and secured on the units, including controlled drugs?"
- "What did your most recent kitchen inspection find, and can I see how food is stored and prepared?"
- "Who leads your infection prevention program, and how do you make sure staff follow practices like hand hygiene every day?"
- "What specific steps do you take to prevent abuse and neglect, and how are staff trained on them?"
- "Can you tell me what this citation involved and what steps you took to bring care back up to standard?"
- "How many residents here use oxygen or breathing equipment, and who checks that equipment each shift?"
- "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
- "Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"
Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Foxwood Springs Living Center | 2.3 mi | Raymore, MO | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Carnegie Village Rehabilitation & Health Care Cent | 4.2 mi | Belton, MO | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Beautiful Savior Home | 4.6 mi | Belton, MO | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Raintree Village | 4.9 mi | Lees Summit, MO | —/5 | ||
| Life Care Center of Grandview | 8.0 mi | Grandview, MO | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | abuse |
| Jefferson Health Care | 8.1 mi | Lees Summit, MO | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Lee's Summit Place | 8.2 mi | Lees Summit, MO | ★★★☆☆ | 4/5 | |
| John Knox Village Care Center | 8.8 mi | Lees Summit, MO | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Aspire Senior Living Pleasant Hill | 10.1 mi | Pleasant Hill, MO | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Golden Years Center for Rehab and Healthcare | 10.3 mi | Harrisonville, MO | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuseSFF |
| Bridgewood Health Care Center | 10.9 mi | Kansas City, MO | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuseSFF |
| Hilltop at Blue River, the | 11.3 mi | Kansas City, MO | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 265476.