How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
3675 Kilauea Avenue, Honolulu, HI 96816 (opens Google Maps) · Honolulu County · (808) 733-8000· 155 certified beds · avg 93 residents/day · certified since Jan 1, 1969 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: HAWAII HEALTH SYSTEMS CORPORATION (7 facilities, chain avg rating 4.2★)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 5/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Showing the latest 3 of 18 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. F-0812
The facility did not provide required paperwork or notices about a resident's needs, their right to appeal a transfer or discharge, or the facility's bed-hold policy (how long a bed is saved during a hospital stay). F-0628
The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. F-0656
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Jul 25, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Jul 25, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide required paperwork or notices about a resident's needs, their right to appeal a transfer or discharge, or the facility's bed-hold policy (how long a bed is saved during a hospital stay). · F-0628 |
| Jul 25, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| Jul 25, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689 |
| Jul 25, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · F-0695 |
| Jul 25, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| Aug 1, 2024 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not run an ongoing quality assurance committee that reviews care problems and creates plans to fix them. · from a complaint · F-0867 |
| Aug 1, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint · F-0609 |
| Aug 1, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. · from a complaint · F-0610 |
| Aug 1, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not coordinate resident assessments with the state's pre-admission screening program for mental illness and intellectual disabilities, or failed to refer residents for the special services they need. · from a complaint · F-0644 |
| Aug 1, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| Sep 14, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint · F-0609 |
| Sep 14, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. · from a complaint · F-0610 |
| Sep 14, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not give residents (and their representatives and the ombudsman, a state advocate for residents) proper advance notice before a transfer or discharge, including information about their right to appeal. · F-0623 |
| Sep 14, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · F-0584 |
| Sep 14, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not post its nurse staffing information every day. Nursing homes must publicly display how many nurses and aides are on duty each day. · F-0732 |
| Sep 14, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| Sep 14, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (3 → 6).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 7 | 0 | E |
| 2024 | 5 | 0 | F |
| 2025 | 6 | 0 | E |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Hawaii avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 4.53 | 4.77 | 3.95 | top 46% in Hawaii; top 22% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 1.81 | 1.64 | 0.69 | top 24% in Hawaii; top 2% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 3.64 | 4.23 | 3.50 | bottom 39% in Hawaii; top 36% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 1.24 | 1.33 | 0.48 | top 42% in Hawaii; top 3% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 17.7 | 36.4 | 45.8 | top 12% in Hawaii; top 2% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 14.6 | 31.5 | 42.9 | top 12% in Hawaii; top 9% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.55, RN 1.82, weekend 3.66.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (4.55 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 5/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: —/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Leahi Hospital. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
Government - State
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hawaii Health Systems Corporation | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 100% | 11/03/2007 |
| Akiyoshi, Derek | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2014 |
| Azama, Garet | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2018 |
| Chun, Bradley | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2018 |
| Gonzales, Violeta | Individual | W-2 Managing Employee | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/22/2018 |
| Hamamoto, Michael | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/01/2018 |
| Hawaii Health Systems Corporation | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/03/2007 |
| Rosen, Linda | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/16/2014 |
| Sanada, Sean | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2018 |
| Sunada, Jared | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2018 |
| Tsuneishi, Lani | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2018 |
| Walker, Ken | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2019 |
| Woo, Jason | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2018 |
All 13 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.
CMS lists this facility under the chain Hawaii Health Systems Corporation — 7 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hi'olani Care Center at Kahala Nui | 1.4 mi | Honolulu, HI | ★★★★★ | 3/5 | |
| Maunalani Nursing and Rehabilitation Center | 1.8 mi | Honolulu, HI | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Palolo Chinese Home | 2.2 mi | Honolulu, HI | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Hale Ola Kino by Arcadia | 2.4 mi | Hon, HI | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Oahu Care Facility | 2.5 mi | Honolulu, HI | ★★★★★ | 3/5 | |
| Islands Skilled Nursing & Rehabilitation | 2.5 mi | Honolulu, HI | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | SFF |
| Arcadia Retirement Residence | 2.7 mi | Honolulu, HI | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Kalakaua Gardens | 2.9 mi | Honolulu, HI | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Hale Nani Rehabilitation and Nursing Center | 3.5 mi | Honolulu, HI | —/5 | SFF | |
| 15 Craigside | 4.7 mi | Honolulu, HI | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| The Care Center of Honolulu | 4.7 mi | Honolulu, HI | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| The Ching Villas | 5.0 mi | Honolulu, HI | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
CMS records place this facility in Honolulu, HI — 27 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 125010.
This page is the printable visit checklist. If your browser did not open the print dialog automatically, use File → Print (Ctrl/⌘-P).
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details