Maunalani Nursing and Rehabilitation Center

5113 Maunalani Circle, Honolulu, HI 96816 (opens Google Maps) · Honolulu County · (808) 732-0771· 100 certified beds · avg 87 residents/day · certified since Jan 1, 1967 · Medicare and Medicaid certified

Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →

4/5

Health inspection rating (on-site)

inspected Aug 29, 2024

Serious findings on record

most recent Aug 14, 2025

$32,133

Fines, last 3 years

5.05

Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

New to these records? How to read an inspection report →

Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 5/5 · how star ratings work →

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Actual harm, isolated · Aug 14, 2025 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.

Corrected: Sep 15, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, isolated · Oct 18, 2024 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Corrected: Nov 9, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

Inspection findings in the public record

Showing the latest 3 of 23 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.

Jun 10, 2026E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern
The facility did not make sure residents actually saw their doctor face-to-face at all required visits. Doctors must examine nursing home residents in person on a regular schedule. · from a complaint F-0712
Jun 10, 2026D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated
The facility did not honor residents' right to voice complaints without discrimination or retaliation, or did not have a working complaint process that resolves issues promptly. · from a complaint F-0585
Aug 14, 2025G · Actual harm, isolated
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint F-0689

View all 23 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.

Date	Severity	What the facility was cited for
Jun 10, 2026	E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern	The facility did not make sure residents actually saw their doctor face-to-face at all required visits. Doctors must examine nursing home residents in person on a regular schedule. · from a complaint · F-0712
Jun 10, 2026	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not honor residents' right to voice complaints without discrimination or retaliation, or did not have a working complaint process that resolves issues promptly. · from a complaint · F-0585
Aug 14, 2025	▲ G · Actual harm, isolated	The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint · F-0689
Oct 18, 2024	▲ G · Actual harm, isolated	The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint · F-0689
Oct 18, 2024	E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern	When a resident had a planned discharge, the facility did not make sure the necessary information was communicated to the resident and to the doctors or facility taking over their care. · from a complaint · F-0661
Oct 18, 2024	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint · F-0684
Oct 18, 2024	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not make sure the resident's doctor reviewed their care and wrote, signed, and dated progress notes and orders at each required visit. · from a complaint · F-0711
Aug 29, 2024	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · from a complaint · F-0550
Aug 29, 2024	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · F-0641
Aug 29, 2024	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · F-0686
Aug 31, 2023	E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern	The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812
Aug 31, 2023	E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern	The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880
Aug 31, 2023	E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern	The facility did not keep its building and grounds safe, functional, clean, and comfortable for residents, staff, and visitors. · F-0921
Aug 31, 2023	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care. · F-0578
Aug 31, 2023	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it. · F-0697
Aug 31, 2023	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761
Aug 31, 2023	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not provide food that accounts for each resident's allergies, intolerances, and personal preferences, or did not offer appealing alternatives. · F-0806
Oct 14, 2022	E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern	The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880
Oct 14, 2022	E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern	The facility did not keep its building and grounds safe, functional, clean, and comfortable for residents, staff, and visitors. · F-0921
Oct 14, 2022	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656
Oct 14, 2022	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · F-0684
Oct 14, 2022	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it. · F-0697
Oct 14, 2022	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility's menus did not meet residents' nutritional needs, or were not prepared in advance, followed as written, kept up to date, or reviewed by a dietician. · F-0803

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (7 → 3).

Citations by recorded inspection yearPublished citation counts, not a quality score · Source: CMS, 2026-08-01

All citationsSerious citations (G–L)

2022

2023

2024

2025

2026

All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.

Year	Citations	Serious (G–L)	Worst severity that year
2022	6	0	E
2023	7	0	E
2024	7	1	G ▲
2025	1	1	G ▲
2026	2	0	E

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

How to file a complaint about care →

2 fines totaling $32,133.

Every penalty CMS publishes for this facility in the 3-year window is listed —none excluded. The count and the dollar total come from two different CMS datasets and agree for this facility. Penalties older than the window are dropped by CMS before publication, not by us.

Date	Type	Amount / length
Aug 14, 2025	Fine	$24,115
Oct 18, 2024	Fine	$8,018

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

What these staffing numbers mean →

Nurse time, in contextAdjusted hours per resident per day · Source: CMS, 2026-08-01

This facilityHawaii averageU.S. average

Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)

5.05

4.77

3.95

Registered Nurse hours

1.49

1.64

0.69

Weekend total nurse staffing

4.46

4.23

3.50

All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.

Measure	This facility	Hawaii avg	U.S. avg	Where it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)	5.05	4.77	3.95	top 32% in Hawaii; top 12% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours	1.49	1.64	0.69	bottom 46% in Hawaii; top 5% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing	4.46	4.23	3.50	top 32% in Hawaii; top 13% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)	1.14	1.33	0.48	bottom 49% in Hawaii; top 4% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)	97.4	36.4	45.8	bottom 5% in Hawaii; bottom 1% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)	93.9	31.5	42.9	bottom 5% in Hawaii; bottom 1% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 5.51, RN 1.62, weekend 4.86.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (5.51 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 4/5.

Quality measures: assessments & claims

Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.

Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5

Costs & payment

Price evidence · separate from quality

No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Maunalani Nursing and Rehabilitation Center. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.

Calculate a stay from a quote you receive

Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.

Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.

Before you compare prices

Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.

Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price

Who owns this facility

How to read ownership records →

Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →

Non profit - Other

Owner / manager	Type	Role	Stake	Since
The Maunalani Foundation	Organization	5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest	100%	03/16/1987
Blanchette, Patricia	Individual	Contracted Managing Employee	NOT APPLICABLE	06/01/2013
Blanchette, Patricia	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	12/23/2024
Chantavy, Sai	Individual	W-2 Managing Employee	NOT APPLICABLE	12/28/2015
Chantavy, Sai	Individual	Corporate Officer	NOT APPLICABLE	12/28/2015
Chantavy, Sai	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	12/03/2024
Chantavy, Sai	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	12/23/2024
Choy, Mel	Individual	Corporate Director	NOT APPLICABLE	11/07/2019
Flores, Jerome	Individual	W-2 Managing Employee	NOT APPLICABLE	07/23/2018
Flores, Jerome	Individual	Corporate Officer	NOT APPLICABLE	07/23/2018
Goldcamp, Joseph	Individual	Corporate Director	NOT APPLICABLE	12/28/2015
Haseyama, Kevin	Individual	Corporate Director	NOT APPLICABLE	09/23/2022
Heirakuji, Lynn	Individual	Corporate Director	NOT APPLICABLE	11/17/2019
Peroff, Roderick	Individual	Corporate Director	NOT APPLICABLE	12/28/2015
Sombrero, Steve	Individual	Corporate Director	NOT APPLICABLE	11/07/2019
The Maunalani Foundation	Organization	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	12/23/2024
Todani, David	Individual	Corporate Director	NOT APPLICABLE	12/28/2015
Wriston, Arthur	Individual	Corporate Director	NOT APPLICABLE	12/28/2015
Yasuda, Neal	Individual	Corporate Director	NOT APPLICABLE	05/11/2018

All 19 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.

Questions to ask on your visit

Full visit checklist →

Print visit checklist

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

"What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
"How often does the attending doctor physically see each resident, and how is that documented?"
"Walk me through what happens when a resident or family files a grievance — who responds and how fast?"
"What exactly do you hand off to the next provider when a resident is discharged, and how do you confirm they received it?"
"How do you make sure each resident's care follows the doctor's orders, and what changed after this citation?"
"How often does each resident's doctor visit and review their care in person?"
"Can you give me examples of how your staff protect residents' dignity in everyday care, like bathing and dressing?"
"Who completes resident assessments here, and how do you check them for accuracy?"

Also worth asking anywhere

"What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
"Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
"CMS reports 97% total nursing staff turnover here — who on the care team has been with you longest?"
"The ownership record on file lists 19 owning or managing parties — who makes the decisions about staffing levels?"
"Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"

Nearby facilities (12 closest of 24 within 20 miles)

Facility	Distance	City	Overall	Inspection	Flags
Palolo Chinese Home	0.4 mi	Honolulu, HI	★★☆☆☆	2/5
Hi'olani Care Center at Kahala Nui	1.4 mi	Honolulu, HI	★★★★★	3/5
Leahi Hospital	1.8 mi	Honolulu, HI	★★★★★	4/5
Oahu Care Facility	2.6 mi	Honolulu, HI	★★★★★	3/5
Islands Skilled Nursing & Rehabilitation	2.6 mi	Honolulu, HI	★☆☆☆☆	1/5	SFF
Arcadia Retirement Residence	2.6 mi	Honolulu, HI	★★★★☆	3/5
Hale Ola Kino by Arcadia	2.6 mi	Hon, HI	★★★★★	4/5
Kalakaua Gardens	3.3 mi	Honolulu, HI	★★☆☆☆	2/5
Hale Nani Rehabilitation and Nursing Center	3.3 mi	Honolulu, HI		—/5	SFF
15 Craigside	4.2 mi	Honolulu, HI	★★★★★	5/5
The Care Center of Honolulu	4.3 mi	Honolulu, HI	★★☆☆☆	2/5
The Ching Villas	4.4 mi	Honolulu, HI	★★★★☆	3/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

Other facilities in the same county

CMS records place this facility in Honolulu, HI — 27 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.

Nuuanu Hale — Honolulu, HI · overall 2/5
Pearl City Post Acute — Pearl City, HI · overall 5/5
Pu'uwai 'o Makaha — Waianae, HI · overall 4/5

Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.

All facilities in Honolulu →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 125013.