HawaiiHonolulu

Kalakaua Gardens

1723 Kalakaua Avenue, Honolulu, HI 96826 · Honolulu County · 49 certified beds · avg 39 residents/day · certified since Jun 27, 2017 · Medicare and Medicaid certified

Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →

2/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
2
Serious findings on record
$55,692
Fines, last 3 years
6.07
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 2/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Jan 17, 2025 · F-0689

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Mar 3, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Jan 26, 2024 · F-0726 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not make sure its nurses and nurse aides had the skills and training needed to properly care for every resident.

Why it matters: Undertrained caregivers are more likely to miss warning signs and make care mistakes.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Mar 11, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (31)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Feb 20, 2026F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Feb 20, 2026F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Feb 20, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Feb 20, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make sure residents were fully informed about their own health, care, and treatments in a way they could understand.
Feb 20, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs.
Feb 20, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility gave residents unnecessary mind-altering (psychotropic) medications, or used drugs in a way that restrained residents by dulling their ability to think, move, or function.
Feb 20, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide activities that meet residents' needs and interests. Nursing homes must offer meaningful activity programs, not just leave residents idle.
Feb 20, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make sure its nurses and nurse aides had the skills and training needed to properly care for every resident.
Feb 20, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Feb 20, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide specialized rehabilitation services — like physical, occupational, or speech therapy — by qualified staff when a doctor ordered them for a resident.
Dec 18, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint
Jan 17, 2025▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Jan 17, 2025F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Jan 17, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Jan 17, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
Jan 17, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist.
Jan 17, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Jan 17, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards.
Jan 26, 2024▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not make sure its nurses and nurse aides had the skills and training needed to properly care for every resident. · from a complaint
Jan 26, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care. · from a complaint
Jan 26, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint
Jan 26, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · from a complaint
Jan 26, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make sure residents actually saw their doctor face-to-face at all required visits. Doctors must examine nursing home residents in person on a regular schedule. · from a complaint
Aug 29, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards.
Jun 16, 2023F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Jun 16, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Jun 16, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' right to make their own choices about their daily lives, such as when to wake up, what to eat, or how to spend their time.
Jun 16, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not give residents (and their representatives and the ombudsman, a state advocate for residents) proper advance notice before a transfer or discharge, including information about their right to appeal.
Jun 16, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make sure its nurses and nurse aides had the skills and training needed to properly care for every resident.
Jun 16, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist.
Jun 16, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (7 → 10).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202380F
202451G ▲
202581G ▲
2026100F

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

1 fine totaling $55,692.

DateTypeAmount / length
Jan 17, 2025Fine$55,692

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityHawaii avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)6.074.773.95top 10% in Hawaii; top 4% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours2.141.640.69top 12% in Hawaii; top 1% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing5.794.233.50top 10% in Hawaii; top 2% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)1.761.330.48top 17% in Hawaii; top 1% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)100.036.445.8bottom 2% in Hawaii; bottom 1% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)100.031.542.9bottom 2% in Hawaii; bottom 1% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 5.78, RN 2.04, weekend 5.51. Staffing rating: 4/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Partnership

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
1723 Kalakaua LLCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest43%03/01/2006
Chi Wai CheungOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest9%02/01/2022
Hua DaiOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest9%02/01/2022
John T S Hung and Siew Yoong Hung TrustOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest6%03/01/2006
P E and M LLCOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest29%03/01/2006
Tony K & Rebecca C Yung 1996 Fam Irrv TrOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest02/08/2022
American Savings Bank FSBOrganization5% or Greater Security InterestNOT APPLICABLE08/04/2014
HPL Development LLCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE08/15/2006
Kojima, ColleenIndividualW-2 Managing EmployeeNOT APPLICABLE09/16/2019
Leong, LouisIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE09/01/2009
Leong, LouisIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE09/01/2009
Leong, LouisIndividualGeneral Partnership InterestNOT APPLICABLE09/01/2009
Masuda, RyuchiIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE02/01/2016
Yu, PaulIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE09/01/2009
Yu, PaulIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE09/01/2009
Yu, PaulIndividualGeneral Partnership InterestNOT APPLICABLE09/01/2009

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Hale Ola Kino by Arcadia0.7 miHon, HI★★★★★4/5
Oahu Care Facility0.8 miHonolulu, HI★★★★★3/5
Islands Skilled Nursing & Rehabilitation0.8 miHonolulu, HI★☆☆☆☆1/5SFF
Arcadia Retirement Residence0.9 miHonolulu, HI★★★★☆3/5
Hale Nani Rehabilitation and Nursing Center1.2 miHonolulu, HI—/5SFF
15 Craigside2.3 miHonolulu, HI★★★★★5/5
The Care Center of Honolulu2.3 miHonolulu, HI★★☆☆☆2/5
Kuakini Geriatric Care, INC2.5 miHonolulu, HI★☆☆☆☆1/5SFF
Liliha Healthcare Center2.6 miHonolulu, HI★★★☆☆2/5
The Ching Villas2.6 miHonolulu, HI★★★★☆3/5
Leahi Hospital2.9 miHonolulu, HI★★★★★4/5
Maluhia2.9 miHonolulu, HI★★★★★5/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Honolulu →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 125066.