HawaiiHonolulu

The Ching Villas

2230 Liliha Street, Honolulu, HI 96817 · Honolulu County · 163 certified beds · avg 145 residents/day · certified since Jul 23, 2015 · Medicare and Medicaid certified

Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →

Part of chain: OHANA PACIFIC MANAGEMENT CO. (6 facilities, chain avg rating 3.3★)

3/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
5.71
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

All citations in the current public record (40)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Jan 16, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Jan 16, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide or arrange specialized rehabilitation services — such as physical, occupational, or speech therapy — for residents who needed them.
Jan 16, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make sure residents were fully informed about their own health, care, and treatments in a way they could understand.
Jan 16, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint
Jan 16, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Jan 16, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Jan 16, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections.
Jan 16, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Oct 9, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away. · from a complaint
Oct 9, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · from a complaint
Oct 9, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint
Oct 9, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · from a complaint
Oct 9, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint
Dec 13, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not honor residents' right to make their own choices about their daily lives, such as when to wake up, what to eat, or how to spend their time.
Dec 13, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Dec 13, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
Dec 13, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents' personal and medical information private and confidential.
Dec 13, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility transferred or discharged a resident without a valid reason, or failed to provide the required documentation and information when moving a resident out.
Dec 13, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Dec 13, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
Dec 13, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Dec 13, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility used feeding tubes without a valid medical reason or the resident's agreement, or did not provide proper care to residents who have feeding tubes.
Dec 13, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Dec 13, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it.
Dec 13, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe, appropriate care for residents who need dialysis — the treatment that filters the blood when kidneys fail.
Dec 13, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist.
Dec 13, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Dec 13, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
May 23, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint
Dec 22, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
Dec 22, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.
Dec 22, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
Dec 22, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Dec 22, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist.
Dec 22, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication.
Dec 22, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Dec 22, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility's menus did not meet residents' nutritional needs, or were not prepared in advance, followed as written, kept up to date, or reviewed by a dietician.
Dec 22, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Dec 22, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures for offering residents flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
Dec 22, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep its building and grounds safe, functional, clean, and comfortable for residents, staff, and visitors.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (15 → 8).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
2023110D
2024160E
202550E
202680E

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityHawaii avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)5.714.773.95top 20% in Hawaii; top 6% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours2.351.640.69top 7% in Hawaii; top 1% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing4.974.233.50top 17% in Hawaii; top 7% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)1.791.330.48top 12% in Hawaii; top 1% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)36.336.445.8bottom 43% in Hawaii; top 27% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)40.731.542.9bottom 26% in Hawaii; top 49% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 6.46, RN 2.66, weekend 5.63. Staffing rating: 5/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 4/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Limited Liability company

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Kishaba, RichardIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE12/15/2014
Ohana Pacific Management Company INCOrganizationDirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE04/23/2014
Richard S. Kishaba 2010 Dynasty TrustOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE07/30/2010
Davis, DustyIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE03/14/2022
Davis, DustyIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/14/2022
First Hawaiian BankOrganization5% or Greater Mortgage InterestNOT APPLICABLE12/27/2019
Hata, RandallIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE12/15/2014
Hata, RandallIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE12/15/2014
Kishaba, RichardIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE12/15/2014
Kishaba, RichardIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE12/15/2014
Kishaba, SandraIndividualIndividual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2025
Kop, ArnoldIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2023
Kop, ArnoldIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2023
Lo, WesleyIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2020
Lo, WesleyIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2020
Lore, AndrewIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE02/01/2022
Lore, AndrewIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE02/01/2022
McClennon, PamelaIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2025
McClennon, PamelaIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2025
Morikuni, SuanneIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2015

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
The Care Center of Honolulu0.3 miHonolulu, HI★★☆☆☆2/5
15 Craigside0.4 miHonolulu, HI★★★★★5/5
Maluhia0.7 miHonolulu, HI★★★★★5/5
Liliha Healthcare Center0.7 miHonolulu, HI★★★☆☆2/5
Kuakini Geriatric Care, INC0.8 miHonolulu, HI★☆☆☆☆1/5SFF
Nuuanu Hale1.0 miHonolulu, HI★★☆☆☆2/5
Hale Nani Rehabilitation and Nursing Center1.5 miHonolulu, HI—/5SFF
Avalon Care Center - Honolulu, LLC1.7 miHonolulu, HI★★☆☆☆1/5
Arcadia Retirement Residence2.3 miHonolulu, HI★★★★☆3/5
Islands Skilled Nursing & Rehabilitation2.5 miHonolulu, HI★☆☆☆☆1/5SFF
Oahu Care Facility2.5 miHonolulu, HI★★★★★3/5
Kalakaua Gardens2.6 miHonolulu, HI★★☆☆☆2/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Honolulu →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 125064.