MarylandHyattsville

Sacred Heart Home INC

5805 Queens Chapel Road, Hyattsville, MD 20782 · Prince Georges County · 44 certified beds · avg 43 residents/day · certified since Aug 1, 1974

5/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
5.80
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★★★5/5 · CMS overall rating: 5/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

All citations in the current public record (19)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Jul 29, 2025F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Dec 14, 2022F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not make sure its nurse aides had the skills needed to care for residents, including training in dementia care and abuse prevention.
Dec 14, 2022E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility used bed rails without first trying safer alternatives, or without assessing the resident's safety risk, discussing the risks and benefits with the resident or family, getting consent, and installing the rails correctly.
Dec 14, 2022E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Dec 14, 2022E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not regularly inspect bed frames, mattresses, and bed rails for safety, or the rails and mattresses were not attached safely to the frames.
Dec 14, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Dec 14, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Dec 14, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide or arrange specialized rehabilitation services — such as physical, occupational, or speech therapy — for residents who needed them.
Dec 14, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards.
Dec 14, 2022C · Minimal risk, facility-wideThe facility did not post its nurse staffing information every day. Nursing homes must publicly display how many nurses and aides are on duty each day.
Dec 14, 2022C · Minimal risk, facility-wideThe facility did not arrange hospice services for a resident who needed them, or help the resident move to a facility that could arrange hospice. Hospice provides comfort-focused care for people nearing the end of life.
Dec 14, 2022C · Minimal risk, facility-wideThe facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures for offering residents flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
Dec 14, 2022C · Minimal risk, facility-wideThe facility did not make sure its staff were vaccinated for COVID-19 in accordance with the federal requirements in effect at the time.
Jan 25, 2019D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
Jan 25, 2019D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation.
Jan 25, 2019D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not give residents (and their representatives and the ombudsman, a state advocate for residents) proper advance notice before a transfer or discharge, including information about their right to appeal.
Jan 25, 2019D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide or obtain laboratory tests when a doctor ordered them, or did not promptly report the results back to the doctor who ordered them.
Jan 25, 2019D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards.
Jan 25, 2019D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (12 → 1).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
201960D
2022120F
202510F

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityMaryland avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)5.803.833.95top 5% in Maryland; top 5% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.680.830.69bottom 49% in Maryland; top 38% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing5.173.433.50top 5% in Maryland; top 5% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.380.630.48bottom 23% in Maryland; bottom 47% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)8.740.245.8top 1% in Maryland; top 1% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)0.038.742.9top 1% in Maryland; top 1% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.86, RN 0.57, weekend 4.33. Staffing rating: 5/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: —/5

Who owns this facility

Non profit - Church related

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Ownership Data Not Available

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Crescent Cities Nursing & Rehabilitation Center1.0 miRiverdale, MD★★★☆☆2/5
Complete Care at Hyattsville1.2 miHyattsville, MD★★☆☆☆1/5
White Oak Rehabilitation and Nursing Center1.6 miHyattsville, MD★☆☆☆☆1/5abuse
The HSC Pediatric Skilled Nursing Facility1.7 miWashington, DC★★★☆☆4/5
Ascension Living Carroll Manor2.3 miWashington, DC★★☆☆☆1/5
Washington Ctr for Aging Svcs2.7 miWashington, DC★★★☆☆2/5
Jeanne Jugan Residence2.8 miWashington, DC★★★★★5/5
Sligo Creek Healthcare2.9 miTakoma Park, MD★★★☆☆2/5
Adelphi Nursing and Rehabilitation Center3.3 miAdelphi, MD★★☆☆☆2/5
Althea Woodland Nursing Home3.9 miSilver Spring, MD★★★★☆4/5
Deanwood Rehabilitation and Wellness Center4.4 miWashington, DC★★☆☆☆1/5abuse
Stoddard Baptist Nursing Home4.8 miWashington, DC★★★☆☆3/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Hyattsville →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 21E009.