How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
3210 Powder Mill Road, Adelphi, MD 20783 (opens Google Maps) · Prince Georges County · (301) 937-3939· 66 certified beds · avg 57 residents/day · certified since Nov 1, 1989 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: STERLING CARE (6 facilities, chain avg rating 4.2★)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★★★5/5 · CMS overall rating: 5/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Showing the latest 3 of 18 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not observe each nurse aide's job performance or provide regular training as required. F-0730
The facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care. F-0578
The facility did not create and follow a basic care plan covering a new resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of admission. The first days are when a new resident is most vulnerable. F-0655
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 9, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not observe each nurse aide's job performance or provide regular training as required. · F-0730 |
| Jun 9, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care. · F-0578 |
| Jun 9, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not create and follow a basic care plan covering a new resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of admission. The first days are when a new resident is most vulnerable. · F-0655 |
| Jun 9, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not help a resident get vision and hearing services — such as eye exams, glasses, hearing tests, or hearing aids. · F-0685 |
| Jun 9, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · F-0686 |
| Jun 9, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Jun 9, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · F-0842 |
| Jun 9, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures for offering residents flu and pneumonia vaccinations. · F-0883 |
| May 25, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · F-0550 |
| May 25, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. · F-0610 |
| May 25, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not reassess a resident after a significant change in their condition, such as a sudden decline in health. A full new assessment is required when a resident's condition changes in a major way. · F-0637 |
| May 25, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · F-0686 |
| May 25, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689 |
| May 25, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration. · F-0692 |
| May 25, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| May 25, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Nov 13, 2018 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · F-0842 |
| Nov 13, 2018 | B · Potential for minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not give residents (and their representatives and the ombudsman, a state advocate for residents) proper advance notice before a transfer or discharge, including information about their right to appeal. · F-0623 |
Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (8 → 8).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 | 2 | 0 | E |
| 2022 | 8 | 0 | D |
| 2025 | 8 | 0 | E |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Maryland avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.10 | 3.83 | 3.95 | bottom 13% in Maryland; bottom 17% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.50 | 0.83 | 0.69 | bottom 19% in Maryland; bottom 38% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 2.94 | 3.43 | 3.50 | bottom 30% in Maryland; bottom 28% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.59 | 0.63 | 0.48 | top 39% in Maryland; top 24% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 66.7 | 40.2 | 45.8 | bottom 1% in Maryland; bottom 8% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 97.9 | 38.7 | 42.9 | bottom 1% in Maryland; bottom 1% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.88, RN 0.63, weekend 3.68.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.88 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 1/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Sterling Care Hillhaven. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Limited Liability company
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grunbaum, Yoni | Individual | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 10% | 08/01/2023 |
| Hillhaven Operator Holdco, LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 100% | 08/01/2023 |
| Jek Irrv Tr II | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 33% | 08/01/2023 |
| NMJ Irrv Tr II | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 33% | 08/01/2023 |
| Siyo Holdings LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 10% | 08/01/2023 |
| Kagan, Jeffrey | Individual | W-2 Managing Employee | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/01/2023 |
| Kagan, Jeffrey | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/01/2023 |
All 7 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.
CMS lists this facility under the chain Sterling Care — 6 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Riderwood Village | 1.4 mi | Silver Spring, MD | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Autumn Lake Healthcare at Silver Spring | 2.4 mi | Silver Spring, MD | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Adelphi Nursing and Rehabilitation Center | 2.5 mi | Adelphi, MD | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Althea Woodland Nursing Home | 2.8 mi | Silver Spring, MD | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Complete Care at Springbrook | 3.1 mi | Silver Spring, MD | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Fairland Center | 3.2 mi | Silver Spring, MD | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Autumn Lake Healthcare at Arcola | 4.0 mi | Silver Spring, MD | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Harmony Suites Rehabilitation and Wellness Center | 4.4 mi | Silver Spring, MD | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Autumn Lake Healthcare at Oak Manor | 4.5 mi | Burtonsville, MD | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Sligo Creek Healthcare | 4.5 mi | Takoma Park, MD | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Crescent Cities Nursing & Rehabilitation Center | 4.7 mi | Riverdale, MD | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| White Oak Rehabilitation and Nursing Center | 4.8 mi | Hyattsville, MD | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
CMS records place this facility in Prince Georges, MD — 19 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 215212.
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details