How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
Landmark of Rayne
2021 Crowley Rayne Highway, Rayne, LA 70578 (opens Google Maps) · Acadia County · (337) 783-8101· 130 certified beds · avg 100 residents/day · certified since Apr 17, 2002 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: THE BEEBE FAMILY (48 facilities, chain avg rating 2.8★)
3/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
inspected May 13, 2026
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
4.18
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)
Every record stays on this page.
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Inspection findings in the public record
Showing the latest 3 of 30 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. F-0842
The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. F-0641
The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. F-0656
View all 30 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| May 13, 2026 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · F-0842 |
| May 13, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · F-0641 |
| May 13, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| May 13, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689 |
| May 13, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time. · F-0759 |
| May 13, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Dec 16, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · from a complaint · F-0657 |
| Apr 9, 2025 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not fully assess residents on time — a complete assessment of health, abilities, and needs is required when a resident is first admitted and at least once every 12 months after that. · F-0636 |
| Apr 9, 2025 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not enter each resident's assessment information into the required format and send it to the state within 7 days of completing the assessment, as the rules require. · F-0640 |
| Apr 9, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility's menus did not meet residents' nutritional needs, or were not prepared in advance, followed as written, kept up to date, or reviewed by a dietician. · F-0803 |
| Apr 9, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Apr 9, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not give residents (and their representatives and the ombudsman, a state advocate for residents) proper advance notice before a transfer or discharge, including information about their right to appeal. · F-0623 |
| Apr 9, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · F-0641 |
| Apr 9, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| Apr 9, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · F-0657 |
| Mar 12, 2025 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not run an ongoing quality assurance committee that reviews care problems and creates plans to fix them. · from a complaint · F-0867 |
| Mar 12, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · from a complaint · F-0686 |
| Mar 20, 2024 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Mar 20, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · F-0695 |
| Mar 20, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility's menus did not meet residents' nutritional needs, or were not prepared in advance, followed as written, kept up to date, or reviewed by a dietician. · F-0803 |
| Mar 20, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not honor residents' right to form and take part in resident or family groups, such as a resident council. · F-0565 |
| Mar 20, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility used physical restraints — devices that limit a resident's movement — when they weren't needed for medical treatment. · F-0604 |
| Mar 20, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| Mar 20, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · F-0677 |
| Mar 20, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits. · F-0758 |
| Mar 20, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Oct 24, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not maintain an effective pest control program to prevent or deal with mice, insects, or other pests. · from a complaint · F-0925 |
| Aug 22, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · from a complaint · F-0584 |
| Aug 22, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint · F-0656 |
| Aug 22, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint · F-0684 |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (8 → 6).
All citationsSerious citations (G–L)
2023
All citations: 4
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2024
All citations: 9
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2025
All citations: 11
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2026
All citations: 6
Serious citations (G–L): 0
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 4 | 0 | D |
| 2024 | 9 | 0 | F |
| 2025 | 11 | 0 | F |
| 2026 | 6 | 0 | E |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
What these staffing numbers mean →
This facilityLouisiana averageU.S. average
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)
This facility: 4.18
Louisiana average: 4.04
U.S. average: 3.95
Registered Nurse hours
This facility: 0.35
Louisiana average: 0.32
U.S. average: 0.69
Weekend total nurse staffing
This facility: 3.07
Louisiana average: 3.45
U.S. average: 3.50
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Louisiana avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 4.18 | 4.04 | 3.95 | top 38% in Louisiana; top 33% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.35 | 0.32 | 0.69 | top 25% in Louisiana; bottom 15% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 3.07 | 3.45 | 3.50 | bottom 31% in Louisiana; bottom 35% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.14 | 0.20 | 0.48 | bottom 44% in Louisiana; bottom 4% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 70.5 | 47.6 | 45.8 | bottom 5% in Louisiana; bottom 5% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 44.4 | 41.6 | 42.9 | bottom 43% in Louisiana; bottom 45% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.98, RN 0.33, weekend 2.93.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.98 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 2/5.
Quality measures: assessments & claims
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 2/5 · long-stay residents: 1/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5
Costs & payment
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Landmark of Rayne. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Calculate a stay from a quote you receive
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Before you compare prices
- Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
- Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
- Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
Who owns this facility
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Limited Liability company
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elton G Beebe Sr Revocable Trust | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 10% | 10/21/2021 |
| Extended Care Associates, INC. | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 10% | 10/01/2021 |
| Jefferson Boyd and Jojuana Summit Tr | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 30% | 10/01/2021 |
| Johnson, Terry | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 30% | 10/01/2021 |
| Tr for the WHDS Great Grandchildren | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 30% | 10/01/2021 |
| Account Management Services INC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/01/2021 |
| Account Management Services INC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/01/2021 |
| Administrative Systems INC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/01/2021 |
| Administrative Systems INC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/01/2021 |
| Alisons 2016 Fam Tr No 2 | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2025 |
| Aria Care Management LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/01/2022 |
| Beebe 2013 Childrens Tr NG | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2025 |
| Beebe, Bobby | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/26/2012 |
| Beebe, Bobby | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2010 |
| Beebe, Bobby | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2013 |
| Beebe, Bobby | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2013 |
| Beebe, Elton | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/01/2021 |
| Beebe, Elton | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/01/2021 |
| Extended Care Associates, INC. | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/01/2021 |
| Felicias 2016 Fam Tr No 2 | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2025 |
Showing 20 of 44 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 24 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.
Other facilities in the same chain
CMS lists this facility under the chain The Beebe Family — 48 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
- Landmark South Nursing & Rehabilitation Center — Baton Rouge, LA · overall 4/5
- Lexington House — Alexandria, LA · overall 1/5
- Matthews Memorial Health Care Center — Alexandria, LA · overall 2/5
- Riverview Care Center — Bossier City, LA · overall 1/5
- Senior Village Nursing & Rehabilitation Center — Opelousas, LA · overall 3/5
- Southern Hills Healthcare and Rehabilitation — Shreveport, LA · overall 1/5
- The Oaks of Houma — Houma, LA · overall 4/5
- The Summit — Alexandria, LA · overall 1/5
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 47 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "How do you keep residents' medical records accurate, complete, and secure?"
- "Who completes resident assessments here, and how do you check them for accuracy?"
- "Can you show me an example care plan, and how are families included when it's created and updated?"
- "What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
- "What is your current medication error rate, and what have you changed to bring errors down?"
- "Who leads your infection prevention program, and how do you make sure staff follow practices like hand hygiene every day?"
- "Who is on the team that builds each resident's care plan, and how quickly is it in place after admission?"
- "How soon after admission is a full assessment completed, and how are the findings shared with the family?"
Also worth asking anywhere
- "Your weekend nurse staffing is reported below the Louisiana midpoint — how does the weekend schedule differ from a weekday?"
- "Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
- "CMS reports 71% total nursing staff turnover here — who on the care team has been with you longest?"
- "The ownership record on file lists 44 owning or managing parties — who makes the decisions about staffing levels?"
- "Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"
Nearby facilities (12 closest of 19 within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Southwind Nursing & Rehabilitation Center | 1.6 mi | Crowley, LA | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| The Ellington | 4.3 mi | Rayne, LA | ★★☆☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| The Encore Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center | 6.2 mi | Crowley, LA | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Acadia St. Landry Nursing & Rehabilitation Center | 13.6 mi | Church Point, LA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Kaplan Healthcare Center | 15.6 mi | Kaplan, LA | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Camelot Rehabilitation at Magnolia Park | 15.7 mi | Lafayette, LA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Pelican Pointe Healthcare and Rehabilitation | 15.8 mi | Maurice, LA | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Louisiana Extended Care Hospital of Lafayette | 16.3 mi | Lafayette, LA | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Lady of the Oaks Retirement Manor | 16.9 mi | Lafayette, LA | ★★☆☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Gueydan Memorial Guest Home | 17.2 mi | Gueydan, LA | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Vermilion Health Care Center | 17.7 mi | Kaplan, LA | ★★★★☆ | 5/5 | |
| Southwest Louisiana War Veterans Home | 18.0 mi | Jennings, LA | ★★★★☆ | 5/5 |
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 195544.
This page is the printable visit checklist. If your browser did not open the print dialog automatically, use File → Print (Ctrl/⌘-P).