How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
Kadima Rehabilitation & Nursing at North Strabane
100 Tandem Village Road, Canonsburg, PA 15317 (opens Google Maps) · Washington County · (724) 743-9000· 62 certified beds · avg 60 residents/day · certified since Jan 31, 2001 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: KADIMA HEALTHCARE GROUP (14 facilities, chain avg rating 1.8★)
3/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
inspected Oct 11, 2024
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
3.23
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)
Every record stays on this page.
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Inspection findings in the public record
Showing the latest 3 of 26 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not keep residents' personal and medical information private and confidential. · from a complaint F-0583
The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · from a complaint F-0761
The facility did not designate a qualified infection preventionist — a trained person responsible for running the infection prevention and control program. · from a complaint F-0882
View all 26 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 2, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep residents' personal and medical information private and confidential. · from a complaint · F-0583 |
| Apr 2, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · from a complaint · F-0761 |
| Feb 18, 2026 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not designate a qualified infection preventionist — a trained person responsible for running the infection prevention and control program. · from a complaint · F-0882 |
| Oct 11, 2024 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not educate residents and staff about COVID-19 vaccination, offer the vaccine to those eligible after that education, or properly document everyone's vaccination status. · F-0887 |
| Oct 11, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · F-0842 |
| Oct 11, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups. · F-0558 |
| Oct 11, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · from a complaint · F-0677 |
| Oct 11, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures for offering residents flu and pneumonia vaccinations. · F-0883 |
| Mar 6, 2024 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility was not properly licensed, or did not operate in compliance with federal, state, and local laws, regulations, and accepted professional standards. · from a complaint · F-0836 |
| Oct 6, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · F-0684 |
| Dec 2, 2022 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · F-0550 |
| Dec 2, 2022 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care. · F-0578 |
| Dec 2, 2022 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. · F-0610 |
| Dec 2, 2022 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689 |
| Dec 2, 2022 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems. · F-0756 |
| Dec 2, 2022 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| Dec 2, 2022 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have a working program to monitor how antibiotics are used. Tracking antibiotic use helps make sure these drugs are given only when needed and remain effective. · F-0881 |
| Dec 2, 2022 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not educate residents and staff about COVID-19 vaccination, offer the vaccine to those eligible after that education, or properly document everyone's vaccination status. · F-0887 |
| Dec 2, 2022 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not make sure its staff were vaccinated for COVID-19 in accordance with the federal requirements in effect at the time. · F-0888 |
| Dec 2, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not allow residents to take their own medications when a clinical review showed they could do so safely. Residents have this right if their care team determines it's appropriate. · F-0554 |
| Dec 2, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · F-0600 |
| Dec 2, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility used physical restraints — devices that limit a resident's movement — when they weren't needed for medical treatment. · F-0604 |
| Dec 2, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not create and follow a basic care plan covering a new resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of admission. The first days are when a new resident is most vulnerable. · F-0655 |
| Dec 2, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · F-0684 |
| Dec 2, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · F-0695 |
| Dec 2, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have enough nursing staff each day to meet every resident's needs, or did not have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift. Adequate staffing is one of the strongest predictors of good care. · F-0725 |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (1 → 5).
All citationsSerious citations (G–L)
2022
All citations: 16
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2023
All citations: 1
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2024
All citations: 6
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2026
All citations: 3
Serious citations (G–L): 0
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 16 | 0 | E |
| 2023 | 1 | 0 | E |
| 2024 | 6 | 0 | F |
| 2026 | 3 | 0 | F |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
What these staffing numbers mean →
This facilityPennsylvania averageU.S. average
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)
This facility: 3.23
Pennsylvania average: 3.94
U.S. average: 3.95
Registered Nurse hours
This facility: 0.64
Pennsylvania average: 0.80
U.S. average: 0.69
Weekend total nurse staffing
This facility: 2.91
Pennsylvania average: 3.58
U.S. average: 3.50
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Pennsylvania avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.23 | 3.94 | 3.95 | bottom 24% in Pennsylvania; bottom 23% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.64 | 0.80 | 0.69 | bottom 49% in Pennsylvania; top 43% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 2.91 | 3.58 | 3.50 | bottom 22% in Pennsylvania; bottom 26% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.48 | 0.56 | 0.48 | top 44% in Pennsylvania; top 35% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 64.6 | 44.5 | 45.8 | bottom 7% in Pennsylvania; bottom 10% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 57.1 | 39.9 | 42.9 | bottom 20% in Pennsylvania; bottom 26% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.21, RN 0.64, weekend 2.90.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.21 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 2/5.
Quality measures: assessments & claims
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: 3/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5
Costs & payment
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Kadima Rehabilitation & Nursing at North Strabane. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Calculate a stay from a quote you receive
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Before you compare prices
- Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
- Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
- Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
Who owns this facility
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Corporation
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Morris, Daniel | Individual | Direct Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2024 |
| Strauss, Jonathan | Individual | Direct Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2024 |
| Cibc Bank USA | Organization | 5% or Greater Security Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2024 |
| Cibc Bank USA | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2024 |
| Gilbert, Susan | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2024 |
| Gilbert, Susan | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2024 |
| Kadima Healthcare Group INC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2024 |
| Kadima Healthcare Group INC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2024 |
| Kirksey, Kimberly | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2024 |
| Kirksey, Kimberly | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2024 |
| Lowden, Thomas | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2024 |
| Lowden, Thomas | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2024 |
| Morris, Daniel | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2024 |
| Morris, Daniel | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2024 |
| Naylor, Diedre | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2024 |
| Naylor, Diedre | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2024 |
| North Strabane Property Management, LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2024 |
| Pinnacle Healthcare Solutions INC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2024 |
| Pinnacle Healthcare Solutions INC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2024 |
| Romeo, Michelle | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2024 |
Showing 20 of 23 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 3 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.
Other facilities in the same chain
CMS lists this facility under the chain Kadima Healthcare Group — 14 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
- Kadima Rehabilitation & Nursing at Palmyra — Palmyra, PA · overall —/5SFF
- Kadima Rehabilitation & Nursing at Pottstown — Pottstown, PA · overall 1/5
- Kadima Rehabilitation & Nursing at Washington — Washington, PA · overall 2/5
- Kadima Rehabilitation & Nursing at Campbelltown — Palmyra, PA · overall 1/5SFF
- Kadima Rehabilitation & Nursing at Greenville — Greenville, PA · overall 1/5
- Kadima Rehabilitation & Nursing at Harmony — Harmony, PA · overall 1/5abuse
- Kadima Rehabilitation & Nursing at Irwin — North Huntingdon, PA · overall 1/5
- Kadima Rehabilitation & Nursing at Lakeside — Dallas, PA · overall 2/5
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 13 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "How do you protect residents' privacy, both in their medical records and in day-to-day care?"
- "Can you show me how medications are stored and secured on the units, including controlled drugs?"
- "Who is your infection preventionist, and what training do they have?"
- "How do you handle COVID-19 vaccination for residents and staff, and what happens during an outbreak?"
- "How do you keep residents' medical records accurate, complete, and secure?"
- "Can you give me examples of how you adjust daily routines and room setups to fit each resident's preferences?"
- "How many aides are on each shift, and how do you make sure every resident gets timely help with bathing, dressing, and meals?"
- "What percentage of your residents and staff are vaccinated against flu and pneumonia, and how do you offer the vaccines?"
Also worth asking anywhere
- "Your weekend nurse staffing is reported below the Pennsylvania midpoint — how does the weekend schedule differ from a weekday?"
- "Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
- "CMS reports 65% total nursing staff turnover here — who on the care team has been with you longest?"
- "The ownership record on file lists 23 owning or managing parties — who makes the decisions about staffing levels?"
- "Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"
Nearby facilities (12 closest of 45 within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wecare at South Hills Rehabilitation and Nrsg Ctr | 0.5 mi | Canonsburg, PA | —/5 | abuseSFF | |
| McMurray Hills Rehabilitation and Healthcare Cente | 1.3 mi | McMurray, PA | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Peters Township Post Acute | 1.3 mi | McMurray, PA | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Townview Health and Rehabilitation Center | 2.5 mi | Canonsburg, PA | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Greenery Center for Rehab and Nursing | 2.9 mi | Canonsburg, PA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | SFF |
| Friendship Village of South Hi | 4.4 mi | Pittsburgh, PA | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Bridgeville Rehabilitation & Care Center | 4.7 mi | Bridgeville, PA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
| Meadowcrest Rehabilitation & Healthcare Center | 5.7 mi | Bethel Park, PA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Premier Washington Rehabilitation and Nursing Ctr | 6.8 mi | Washington, PA | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Transitions Healthcare Washington Pa | 7.7 mi | Washington, PA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 2/5 | abuse |
| South Hills Post Acute | 8.1 mi | Bethel Park, PA | ★★★☆☆ | 4/5 | |
| Wecare at Mt Lebanon Rehabilitation and Nrsg Ctr | 8.3 mi | Pittsburgh, PA | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
Other facilities in the same county
CMS records place this facility in Washington, PA — 12 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
- Kadima Rehabilitation & Nursing at Washington — Washington, PA · overall 2/5
- Mon Valley Care Center — Monongahela, PA · overall 3/5
- Southmont of Presbyterian Seniorcare — Washington, PA · overall 2/5abuse
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 396073.
This page is the printable visit checklist. If your browser did not open the print dialog automatically, use File → Print (Ctrl/⌘-P).