How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
200 Stoops Drive, Monongahela, PA 15063 (opens Google Maps) · Washington County · (724) 310-1111· 60 certified beds · avg 53 residents/day · certified since Jan 6, 2003 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Showing the latest 3 of 20 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not let a resident help develop and carry out their own plan of care — the written roadmap of the services and support they'll receive, built around their personal goals and preferences. · from a complaint F-0553
The facility did not provide required paperwork or notices about a resident's needs, their right to appeal a transfer or discharge, or the facility's bed-hold policy (how long a bed is saved during a hospital stay). · from a complaint F-0628
The facility did not provide the social services residents need — such as counseling, help with adjustment, or connecting to outside resources — to achieve the best possible quality of life. · from a complaint F-0745
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Feb 27, 2026 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not let a resident help develop and carry out their own plan of care — the written roadmap of the services and support they'll receive, built around their personal goals and preferences. · from a complaint · F-0553 |
| Feb 27, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide required paperwork or notices about a resident's needs, their right to appeal a transfer or discharge, or the facility's bed-hold policy (how long a bed is saved during a hospital stay). · from a complaint · F-0628 |
| Feb 27, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the social services residents need — such as counseling, help with adjustment, or connecting to outside resources — to achieve the best possible quality of life. · from a complaint · F-0745 |
| Dec 3, 2025 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not have a working call system — the button or cord residents use to summon help — in each resident's bathroom and bathing area. · from a complaint · F-0919 |
| Dec 3, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · from a complaint · F-0584 |
| Aug 21, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not post the names, addresses, and phone numbers of state agencies and advocacy groups, along with a notice that residents may file complaints with the state survey agency. · F-0575 |
| Aug 21, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not give residents information about how to apply for and use Medicare and Medicaid benefits. · F-0579 |
| Aug 21, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide safe, appropriate care for residents who need dialysis — the treatment that filters the blood when kidneys fail. · F-0698 |
| Jun 17, 2024 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Jun 17, 2024 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Jun 17, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · F-0695 |
| Jun 17, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not properly inform residents or their representatives about arbitration agreements — contracts that give up the right to sue in court — including their right to refuse to sign. · F-0847 |
| Jun 17, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · F-0684 |
| Jun 17, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits. · F-0758 |
| Jun 17, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have a working program to monitor how antibiotics are used. Tracking antibiotic use helps make sure these drugs are given only when needed and remain effective. · F-0881 |
| Jun 17, 2024 | C · Potential for minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not educate its staff on residents' rights and the facility's responsibilities toward residents. Staff can only respect rights they've been taught about. · F-0942 |
| Jun 17, 2024 | B · Potential for minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not develop or maintain an effective training program for its direct care staff, including training on how to communicate effectively with residents. · F-0941 |
| Jun 17, 2024 | B · Potential for minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not give all staff the required training on its quality improvement program — the internal system for finding problems and making care better. · F-0944 |
| Jun 17, 2024 | B · Potential for minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide its staff with required training on behavioral health — caring for residents with conditions like dementia, depression, or other mental health needs. · F-0949 |
| Aug 3, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide safe, appropriate care for residents who need dialysis — the treatment that filters the blood when kidneys fail. · F-0698 |
Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (11 → 3).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 1 | 0 | E |
| 2024 | 11 | 0 | F |
| 2025 | 5 | 0 | F |
| 2026 | 3 | 0 | E |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Pennsylvania avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.80 | 3.94 | 3.95 | top 44% in Pennsylvania; top 48% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.62 | 0.80 | 0.69 | bottom 46% in Pennsylvania; top 46% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 3.45 | 3.58 | 3.50 | top 45% in Pennsylvania; top 45% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.43 | 0.56 | 0.48 | bottom 49% in Pennsylvania; top 44% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | — | 44.5 | 45.8 | — |
| RN turnover (%) | — | 39.9 | 42.9 | — |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.51, RN 0.57, weekend 3.19.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.51 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 2/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Mon Valley Care Center. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Partnership
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mon Vale Non Acute Care | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 25% | 12/19/2016 |
| Cushman, Michael | Individual | W-2 Managing Employee | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/19/2016 |
| Cushman, Michael | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/19/2016 |
| Long, Cynthia | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/19/2016 |
| Persico, Thomas | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/19/2016 |
| Yakich, Christina | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/10/2023 |
| Yakich, Christina | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/10/2023 |
All 7 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Havencrest Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center | 0.9 mi | Monongahela, PA | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Meadowcrest Rehabilitation & Healthcare Center | 10.9 mi | Bethel Park, PA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Rehabilitation Center at Jefferson Hills, the | 11.1 mi | Jefferson Hills, PA | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Southwestern Manor Nursing and Rehabilitation | 11.5 mi | Pittsburgh, PA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| John J Kane Regional Center-Mc | 13.1 mi | McKeesport, PA | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Riverside Health & Rehab Center | 13.1 mi | McKeesport, PA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Peters Township Post Acute | 13.2 mi | McMurray, PA | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Kadima Rehabilitation & Nursing at North Strabane | 13.3 mi | Canonsburg, PA | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| McMurray Hills Rehabilitation and Healthcare Cente | 13.6 mi | McMurray, PA | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Wecare at South Hills Rehabilitation and Nrsg Ctr | 13.7 mi | Canonsburg, PA | —/5 | abuseSFF | |
| Rose Meadows Health & Rehab Center | 14.3 mi | Pittsburgh, PA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
| Whitehall Borough Post Acute | 14.4 mi | Pittsburgh, PA | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
CMS records place this facility in Washington, PA — 12 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 396085.
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details