How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
90 Humbert Lane, Washington, PA 15301 (opens Google Maps) · Washington County · (724) 228-4740· 120 certified beds · avg 112 residents/day · certified since Feb 11, 1985 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Abuse citation flag (CMS)
Part of chain: TRANSITIONS HEALTHCARE (6 facilities, chain avg rating 2.7★)
The abuse flag means inspectors cited this facility for abuse that caused harm to a resident within the past year, or potential for harm in each of the last two years. Source: CMS.
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 1/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
▲ Actual harm, isolated · Jun 22, 2026 · F-0600 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.
Why it matters: Abuse and neglect cause direct physical and emotional harm and are among the most serious failures a nursing home can have.
Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Jul 21, 2026 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
▲ Actual harm, isolated · Jun 22, 2026 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.
Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Jul 21, 2026 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
▲ Actual harm, isolated · Aug 28, 2025 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.
Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Showing the latest 3 of 21 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint F-0600
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint F-0689
The facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups. F-0558
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 22, 2026 | ▲ G · Actual harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint · F-0600 |
| Jun 22, 2026 | ▲ G · Actual harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint · F-0689 |
| Mar 25, 2026 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups. · F-0558 |
| Mar 25, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep residents' personal and medical information private and confidential. · F-0583 |
| Mar 25, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not honor residents' right to voice complaints without discrimination or retaliation, or did not have a working complaint process that resolves issues promptly. · F-0585 |
| Mar 25, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · F-0695 |
| Mar 25, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe, appropriate care for residents who need dialysis — the treatment that filters the blood when kidneys fail. · F-0698 |
| Mar 25, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have policies on smoking. · F-0926 |
| Jan 29, 2026 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not educate residents and staff about COVID-19 vaccination, offer the vaccine to those eligible after that education, or properly document everyone's vaccination status. · from a complaint · F-0887 |
| Aug 28, 2025 | ▲ G · Actual harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint · F-0689 |
| Jun 3, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · from a complaint · F-0842 |
| Mar 27, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · F-0550 |
| Mar 27, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits. · F-0758 |
| Mar 3, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · from a complaint · F-0761 |
| Sep 11, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint · F-0600 |
| Feb 26, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care. · F-0578 |
| Feb 26, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · F-0684 |
| Feb 26, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility allowed residents to lose the ability to do daily activities — like bathing, dressing, and eating — when there was no medical reason for the decline. Good care helps residents keep the abilities they have. · F-0676 |
| Feb 26, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| Feb 26, 2024 | C · Potential for minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not develop or maintain an effective training program for its direct care staff, including training on how to communicate effectively with residents. · F-0941 |
| Oct 4, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint · F-0689 |
Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (2 → 6).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 1 | 0 | E |
| 2024 | 6 | 0 | E |
| 2025 | 5 | 1 | G ▲ |
| 2026 | 9 | 2 | G ▲ |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Pennsylvania avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 2.77 | 3.94 | 3.95 | bottom 4% in Pennsylvania; bottom 8% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.32 | 0.80 | 0.69 | bottom 4% in Pennsylvania; bottom 12% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 2.52 | 3.58 | 3.50 | bottom 5% in Pennsylvania; bottom 10% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.26 | 0.56 | 0.48 | bottom 12% in Pennsylvania; bottom 23% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 47.3 | 44.5 | 45.8 | bottom 42% in Pennsylvania; bottom 44% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 45.5 | 39.9 | 42.9 | bottom 37% in Pennsylvania; bottom 43% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.54, RN 0.41, weekend 3.22.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.54 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 1/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: 4/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Transitions Healthcare Washington Pa. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Limited Liability company
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feldman, Marc | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 33% | 08/01/2014 |
| Maurano, Matthew | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | — | 08/01/2014 |
| Williams, Kevin | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 33% | 08/01/2014 |
| 90 Humbert Lane LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/01/2014 |
| Baca, Veronica | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2025 |
| Baca, Veronica | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2025 |
| Baca, Veronica | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2025 |
| Capital Funding LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Security Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/30/2020 |
| Feldman, Marc | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/01/2014 |
| Feldman, Marc | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/01/2014 |
| Maurano, Matthew | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/01/2014 |
| Maurano, Matthew | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/01/2014 |
| Maurano, Matthew | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/01/2014 |
| Morris-Walker, Ahmad | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/20/2024 |
| Morris-Walker, Ahmad | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/20/2024 |
| Morris-Walker, Ahmad | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/20/2024 |
| Transitions Healthcare LLC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/01/2014 |
| Transitions Healthcare LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/01/2014 |
| Watson, Jennifer | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/26/2017 |
| Williams, Kevin | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/01/2014 |
Showing 20 of 21 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 1 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.
CMS lists this facility under the chain Transitions Healthcare — 6 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kadima Rehabilitation & Nursing at Washington | 1.8 mi | Washington, PA | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Premier Washington Rehabilitation and Nursing Ctr | 1.8 mi | Washington, PA | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Southmont of Presbyterian Seniorcare | 1.9 mi | Washington, PA | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | abuse |
| Greenery Center for Rehab and Nursing | 5.0 mi | Canonsburg, PA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | SFF |
| Townview Health and Rehabilitation Center | 5.8 mi | Canonsburg, PA | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Wecare at South Hills Rehabilitation and Nrsg Ctr | 7.3 mi | Canonsburg, PA | —/5 | abuseSFF | |
| Kadima Rehabilitation & Nursing at North Strabane | 7.7 mi | Canonsburg, PA | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| McMurray Hills Rehabilitation and Healthcare Cente | 8.8 mi | McMurray, PA | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Peters Township Post Acute | 8.9 mi | McMurray, PA | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Bridgeville Rehabilitation & Care Center | 11.4 mi | Bridgeville, PA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
| Friendship Village of South Hi | 11.8 mi | Pittsburgh, PA | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Meadowcrest Rehabilitation & Healthcare Center | 13.2 mi | Bethel Park, PA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
CMS records place this facility in Washington, PA — 12 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 395692.
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details