PennsylvaniaDrums

Kadima Rehabilitation & Nursing at Luzerne

463 North Hunter Hwy, Drums, PA 18222 · Luzerne County · 37 certified beds · avg 34 residents/day · certified since Apr 1, 1980

Part of chain: KADIMA HEALTHCARE GROUP (14 facilities, chain avg rating 1.8★)

1/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
3
Serious findings on record
$86,122
Fines, last 3 years
3.79
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★☆☆☆☆1/5 · CMS overall rating: 1/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, facility-wide · Jun 11, 2025 · F-0809 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not serve meals and snacks at times that fit residents' needs, preferences, and requests, or did not offer nourishing alternatives for residents who want to eat outside scheduled meal times.

Why it matters: Rigid meal schedules can leave residents hungry, and missed meals contribute to weight loss and weakness.

Severity (L): A life-threatening or extremely dangerous situation existed throughout the facility. The single most serious citation CMS can issue.

Corrected: Jul 11, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, facility-wide · Jun 11, 2025 · F-0812 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.

Why it matters: Unsafe food handling is one of the most common causes of food poisoning, which can be dangerous for frail residents.

Severity (L): A life-threatening or extremely dangerous situation existed throughout the facility. The single most serious citation CMS can issue.

Corrected: Jul 11, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Feb 29, 2024 · F-0686

The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.

Why it matters: Bedsores are painful, can become deeply infected, and in serious cases can be life-threatening.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Apr 29, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (57)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Jun 11, 2025▲ L · Immediate jeopardy, facility-wideThe facility did not serve meals and snacks at times that fit residents' needs, preferences, and requests, or did not offer nourishing alternatives for residents who want to eat outside scheduled meal times. · from a complaint
Jun 11, 2025▲ L · Immediate jeopardy, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · from a complaint
Jun 11, 2025F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not employ enough qualified food and nutrition staff, including a qualified dietician, to properly run its food service. · from a complaint
Jun 11, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility's menus did not meet residents' nutritional needs, or were not prepared in advance, followed as written, kept up to date, or reviewed by a dietician. · from a complaint
Jun 11, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not serve food and drinks that were appetizing, attractive, and at a safe and pleasant temperature. · from a complaint
Apr 17, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not give residents (and their representatives and the ombudsman, a state advocate for residents) proper advance notice before a transfer or discharge, including information about their right to appeal. · from a complaint
Apr 17, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not give the resident or their representative written notice of how long it would hold the resident's bed during a hospital stay or approved leave. · from a complaint
Apr 17, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not let a resident return after a hospital stay or approved leave that lasted longer than the facility's bed-hold policy allowed. Residents generally have the right to come back to the next available bed. · from a complaint
Jan 16, 2025F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not employ enough qualified food and nutrition staff, including a qualified dietician, to properly run its food service.
Jan 16, 2025F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not conduct and document a facility-wide assessment of what staff, supplies, and resources it needs to care for its residents properly — during everyday operations, nights, weekends, and emergencies.
Jan 16, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Jan 16, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration.
Jan 16, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Jan 16, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Jan 16, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures for offering residents flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
Jan 16, 2025B · Minimal risk, repeatedThe facility had resident rooms smaller than required — at least 80 square feet per person in shared rooms and 100 square feet in single rooms.
Nov 15, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make sure its nurses and nurse aides had the skills and training needed to properly care for every resident. · from a complaint
Jul 23, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · from a complaint
Jun 18, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · from a complaint
Jun 18, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide the right treatment and services for residents with dementia or signs of dementia. Dementia care requires specific approaches, training, and patience. · from a complaint
Jun 18, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the social services residents need — such as counseling, help with adjustment, or connecting to outside resources — to achieve the best possible quality of life. · from a complaint
Feb 29, 2024▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.
Feb 29, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not employ enough qualified food and nutrition staff, including a qualified dietician, to properly run its food service.
Feb 29, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
Feb 29, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Feb 29, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not designate a qualified infection preventionist — a trained person responsible for running the infection prevention and control program.
Feb 29, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care.
Feb 29, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs.
Feb 29, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.
Feb 29, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist.
Feb 29, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from misuse of their belongings or money — this is called misappropriation, and it includes theft or improper use of a resident's property or funds.
Feb 29, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Feb 29, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration.
Feb 29, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Feb 29, 2024B · Minimal risk, repeatedThe facility did not give residents proper notice about what Medicare or Medicaid covers, or about charges the resident might owe for services that aren't covered.
Feb 29, 2024B · Minimal risk, repeatedThe facility did not give residents (and their representatives and the ombudsman, a state advocate for residents) proper advance notice before a transfer or discharge, including information about their right to appeal.
Feb 29, 2024B · Minimal risk, repeatedThe facility had resident rooms smaller than required — at least 80 square feet per person in shared rooms and 100 square feet in single rooms.
Oct 26, 2023F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not designate a qualified infection preventionist — a trained person responsible for running the infection prevention and control program. · from a complaint
Oct 26, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide activities that meet residents' needs and interests. Nursing homes must offer meaningful activity programs, not just leave residents idle. · from a complaint
Oct 26, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility was not managed in a way that uses its money, staff, and resources effectively and efficiently to care for residents. · from a complaint
Sep 7, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint
Apr 20, 2023F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not regularly inspect bed frames, mattresses, and bed rails for safety, or the rails and mattresses were not attached safely to the frames.
Apr 20, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.
Apr 20, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not coordinate resident assessments with the state's pre-admission screening program for mental illness and intellectual disabilities, or failed to refer residents for the special services they need.
Apr 20, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility used bed rails without first trying safer alternatives, or without assessing the resident's safety risk, discussing the risks and benefits with the resident or family, getting consent, and installing the rails correctly.
Apr 20, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide the social services residents need — such as counseling, help with adjustment, or connecting to outside resources — to achieve the best possible quality of life.
Apr 20, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not give residents proper notice about what Medicare or Medicaid covers, or about charges the resident might owe for services that aren't covered.
Apr 20, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not give residents (and their representatives and the ombudsman, a state advocate for residents) proper advance notice before a transfer or discharge, including information about their right to appeal.
Apr 20, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not properly plan a resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs after leaving.
Apr 20, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility allowed residents to lose the ability to do daily activities — like bathing, dressing, and eating — when there was no medical reason for the decline. Good care helps residents keep the abilities they have.
Apr 20, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline.
Apr 20, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Apr 20, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Apr 20, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide or arrange for a doctor to be available for emergencies 24 hours a day.
Apr 20, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide or arrange dental services for its residents. Nursing homes are responsible for making sure residents can get dental care.
Apr 20, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures for offering residents flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
Apr 20, 2023B · Minimal risk, repeatedThe facility had resident rooms smaller than required — at least 80 square feet per person in shared rooms and 100 square feet in single rooms.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (16 → 8).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
2023200F
2024211G ▲
2025162L ▲

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

2 fines totaling $86,122.

DateTypeAmount / length
Apr 17, 2025Fine$22,639
Feb 29, 2024Fine$63,483

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityPennsylvania avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.793.943.95top 45% in Pennsylvania; top 49% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.730.800.69top 41% in Pennsylvania; top 34% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.523.583.50top 41% in Pennsylvania; top 41% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.560.560.48top 34% in Pennsylvania; top 27% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)36.144.545.8top 26% in Pennsylvania; top 27% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)60.039.942.9bottom 16% in Pennsylvania; bottom 22% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.75, RN 0.72, weekend 3.49. Staffing rating: 3/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 1/5 · long-stay residents: 1/5 · short-stay residents: —/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Armson, DylanIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE06/18/2025
Armson, DylanIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE06/18/2025
Cibc Bank USAOrganization5% or Greater Mortgage InterestNOT APPLICABLE08/06/2025
Cibc Bank USAOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE08/06/2025
Harkins, AndreaIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE09/15/2025
Harkins, AndreaIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE09/15/2025
Kadima Healthcare Group INCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE08/29/2018
Kadima Healthcare Group INCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE11/24/2025
Lowden, ThomasIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2025
Lowden, ThomasIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2025
Luzerne Property Management, LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE08/29/2018
Martin Friedman Cpa PCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2025
Morris, DanielIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE08/29/2018
Morris, DanielIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE08/29/2018
Pearlstein, RobertIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2021
Pinnacle Healthcare Solutions INCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2024
Pinnacle Healthcare Solutions INCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE11/24/2025
Strauss, JonathanIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE08/29/2018
Strauss, JonathanIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE08/29/2018
Stryczynski, TracyIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/30/2024

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Mountain City Nursing & Rehabilitation Center6.2 miHazleton, PA★☆☆☆☆1/5abuse
Pavilion at St Luke Village, the7.3 miHazleton, PA★★☆☆☆2/5
Manor at St Luke Village,the7.5 miHazleton, PA★★☆☆☆2/5
Mountain Top Rehabilitation & Healthcare Center7.7 miMountain Top, PA★★☆☆☆2/5abuse
Birchwood Rehabilitation & Healthcare Center9.9 miNanticoke, PA★☆☆☆☆1/5
Lakewood Rehabilitation & Healthcare Center10.3 miNanticoke, PA★☆☆☆☆1/5
Forest Hills Rehabilitation & Healthcare Center10.7 miWeatherly, PA★☆☆☆☆2/5abuse
Edenbrook at Hampton11.8 miWilkes Barre, PA★★★☆☆3/5
Allied Services Meade Street Skilled Nursing13.3 miWilkes Barre, PA★★★★☆4/5
Allied Services Center City Skilled Nursing13.9 miWilkes Barre, PA★★★☆☆3/5
Embassy of Wyoming Valley14.1 miWilkes Barre, PA★★☆☆☆1/5abuse
Glen Brook Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center14.2 miBerwick, PA★★☆☆☆2/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Drums →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 395484.