How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
629 Salisbury Street, Worcester, MA 01609 (opens Google Maps) · Worcester County · (508) 798-8653· 141 certified beds · avg 132 residents/day · certified since Nov 19, 1968 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
▲ Actual harm, isolated · Jul 21, 2023 · F-0697
The facility did not provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it.
Why it matters: Untreated pain causes needless suffering and can lead to depression, poor sleep, and declining health.
Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Aug 18, 2023 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
Showing the latest 3 of 17 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · from a complaint F-0658
The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · from a complaint F-0842
The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. F-0657
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 7, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · from a complaint · F-0658 |
| Apr 7, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · from a complaint · F-0842 |
| Jan 21, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · F-0657 |
| Jan 21, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · F-0695 |
| Jan 21, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time. · F-0759 |
| Jan 21, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| Jan 21, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Oct 9, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not properly complete the required screening (called PASARR) that identifies whether a person entering a nursing home has a mental illness or intellectual disability and needs specialized services. · F-0645 |
| Oct 9, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Jul 21, 2023 | ▲ G · Actual harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it. · F-0697 |
| Jul 21, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · F-0550 |
| Jul 21, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not coordinate resident assessments with the state's pre-admission screening program for mental illness and intellectual disabilities, or failed to refer residents for the special services they need. · F-0644 |
| Jul 21, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not create and follow a basic care plan covering a new resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of admission. The first days are when a new resident is most vulnerable. · F-0655 |
| Jul 21, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections. · F-0690 |
| Jul 21, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility used feeding tubes without a valid medical reason or the resident's agreement, or did not provide proper care to residents who have feeding tubes. · F-0693 |
| Jul 21, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| Jul 21, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (2 → 5).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 8 | 1 | G ▲ |
| 2024 | 2 | 0 | D |
| 2026 | 7 | 0 | D |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Massachusetts avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 0.03 | 3.89 | 3.95 | bottom 1% in Massachusetts; bottom 1% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.02 | 0.65 | 0.69 | bottom 1% in Massachusetts; bottom 1% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 0.02 | 3.51 | 3.50 | bottom 1% in Massachusetts; bottom 1% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.02 | 0.46 | 0.48 | bottom 1% in Massachusetts; bottom 1% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 71.0 | 38.2 | 45.8 | bottom 2% in Massachusetts; bottom 5% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 62.5 | 42.6 | 42.9 | bottom 17% in Massachusetts; bottom 19% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 0.03, RN 0.02, weekend 0.02.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (0.03 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 1/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 4/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Jewish Healthcare Center. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
Non profit - Corporation
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aframe, Jay | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/15/2012 |
| Chandler, Harriette | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/15/2012 |
| Cohen, Lisa | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/30/2018 |
| Cuker, Jonah | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/28/2024 |
| Feingold, Alan | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/30/2018 |
| Fins, Deborah | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/28/2024 |
| Glick, Edward | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/15/2012 |
| Greenberg, Joel | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/30/2018 |
| Gregerman, Minna | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/30/2018 |
| Herman, Peter | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/15/2012 |
| Kashuk, Gerald | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/28/2024 |
| Krintzman, Steven | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/15/2012 |
| Librandi, Vincent | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/06/2023 |
| Librandi, Vincent | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/06/2023 |
| Librandi, Vincent | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/13/2025 |
| Lorstein, Blanche | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/15/2012 |
| Lorusso, Anthony | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2023 |
| Lorusso, Anthony | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2023 |
| Markowitz, Judy | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/28/2024 |
| Ostrow, Philip | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/15/2012 |
Showing 20 of 34 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 14 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holy Trinity Eastern Orthodox N & R Center | 2.0 mi | Worcester, MA | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Odd Fellows Home of Massachusetts | 2.1 mi | Worcester, MA | ★★☆☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| West Side House LTC Facility | 2.3 mi | Worcester, MA | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Hermitage Healthcare (the) | 2.4 mi | Worcester, MA | ★★☆☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Lutheran Rehabilitation and Skilled Care Center | 2.4 mi | Worcester, MA | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| St Mary Health Care Center | 2.8 mi | Worcester, MA | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Christopher House of Worcester | 3.3 mi | Worcester, MA | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Regalcare at Worcester | 3.5 mi | Worcester, MA | ★★☆☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Knollwood Nursing Center | 3.6 mi | Worcester, MA | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Holden Rehabilitation & Nursing Center | 3.6 mi | Holden, MA | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Parsons Hill Rehabilitation & Health Care Center | 3.8 mi | Worcester, MA | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| St Francis Rehabilitation & Nursing Center | 3.8 mi | Worcester, MA | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
CMS records place this facility in Worcester, MA — 50 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 225173.
This page is the printable visit checklist. If your browser did not open the print dialog automatically, use File → Print (Ctrl/⌘-P).
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details