How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
Jaffrey Rehabilitation and Nursing Center
20 Plantation Drive, Jaffrey, NH 03452 (opens Google Maps) · Cheshire County · (603) 532-8762· 83 certified beds · avg 76 residents/day · certified since Apr 1, 1996 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: EPHRAM LAHASKY (22 facilities, chain avg rating 1.8★)
1/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
inspected May 21, 2026
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
2.69
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)
Every record stays on this page.
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★☆☆☆☆1/5 · CMS overall rating: 1/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Inspection findings in the public record
Showing the latest 3 of 21 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. F-0880
The facility did not make sure residents were fully informed about their own health, care, and treatments in a way they could understand. F-0552
The facility gave residents unnecessary mind-altering (psychotropic) medications, or used drugs in a way that restrained residents by dulling their ability to think, move, or function. F-0605
View all 21 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| May 21, 2026 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| May 21, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not make sure residents were fully informed about their own health, care, and treatments in a way they could understand. · F-0552 |
| May 21, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility gave residents unnecessary mind-altering (psychotropic) medications, or used drugs in a way that restrained residents by dulling their ability to think, move, or function. · F-0605 |
| May 21, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · F-0658 |
| May 21, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| May 21, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide each resident with a nourishing, tasty, well-balanced diet that meets their daily nutritional and special dietary needs. · F-0800 |
| May 21, 2026 | B · Potential for minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not conduct and document a facility-wide assessment of what staff, supplies, and resources it needs to care for its residents properly — during everyday operations, nights, weekends, and emergencies. · F-0838 |
| Apr 16, 2025 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not have a registered nurse on duty at least 8 hours a day, or did not have a registered nurse serving full-time as director of nursing. · F-0727 |
| Apr 16, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time. · F-0759 |
| Apr 16, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not electronically submit complete and accurate staffing information to the government, based on payroll and other verifiable records. · F-0851 |
| Apr 16, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · F-0658 |
| Apr 16, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| Apr 16, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · F-0842 |
| Apr 16, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not arrange hospice services for a resident who needed them, or help the resident move to a facility that could arrange hospice. Hospice provides comfort-focused care for people nearing the end of life. · F-0849 |
| Apr 16, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not designate a qualified infection preventionist — a trained person responsible for running the infection prevention and control program. · F-0882 |
| Apr 16, 2025 | B · Potential for minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · F-0641 |
| Apr 26, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Apr 26, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Apr 26, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have a working call system — the button or cord residents use to summon help — in each resident's bathroom and bathing area. · F-0919 |
| Apr 26, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration. · F-0692 |
| Apr 26, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide or obtain laboratory tests when a doctor ordered them, or did not promptly report the results back to the doctor who ordered them. · F-0773 |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (9 → 7).
All citationsSerious citations (G–L)
2024
All citations: 5
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2025
All citations: 9
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2026
All citations: 7
Serious citations (G–L): 0
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 5 | 0 | E |
| 2025 | 9 | 0 | F |
| 2026 | 7 | 0 | F |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
What these staffing numbers mean →
This facilityNew Hampshire averageU.S. average
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)
This facility: 2.69
New Hampshire average: 4.11
U.S. average: 3.95
Registered Nurse hours
This facility: 0.64
New Hampshire average: 0.82
U.S. average: 0.69
Weekend total nurse staffing
This facility: 2.52
New Hampshire average: 3.67
U.S. average: 3.50
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | New Hampshire avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 2.69 | 4.11 | 3.95 | bottom 3% in New Hampshire; bottom 6% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.64 | 0.82 | 0.69 | bottom 29% in New Hampshire; top 44% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 2.52 | 3.67 | 3.50 | bottom 4% in New Hampshire; bottom 10% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.68 | 0.55 | 0.48 | top 24% in New Hampshire; top 17% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 39.7 | 44.1 | 45.8 | top 32% in New Hampshire; top 35% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 36.8 | 40.9 | 42.9 | top 42% in New Hampshire; top 41% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.41, RN 0.81, weekend 3.20.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.41 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 2/5.
Quality measures: assessments & claims
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 2/5 · long-stay residents: 2/5 · short-stay residents: 1/5
Costs & payment
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Jaffrey Rehabilitation and Nursing Center. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Calculate a stay from a quote you receive
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Before you compare prices
- Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
- Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
- Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
Who owns this facility
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Individual
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dragon, Jessica | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/11/2024 |
| Dragon, Jessica | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/11/2024 |
| Dragon, Jessica | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/08/2025 |
| Majekodunmi, Akindele | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2025 |
| Majekodunmi, Akindele | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/28/2025 |
All 5 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.
Other facilities in the same chain
CMS lists this facility under the chain Ephram Lahasky — 22 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
- Comprehensive Rehabilitation and Nursing Center at — Williamsville, NY · overall 1/5
- Country Lane Gardens Rehab & Nursing Ctr — Pleasantville, OH · overall 2/5abuseSFF
- Gardens of Belden Village — Canton, OH · overall 1/5
- Gardens of Euclid Beach — Cleveland, OH · overall 2/5
- Minerva Rehabilitation and Nursing Center — Minerva, OH · overall 4/5
- Majestic Gardens at Memphis Rehab & SNC — Memphis, TN · overall 1/5SFF
- Knollwood Healthcare — Mobile, AL · overall —/5SFF
- Center for Advanced Rehab at Parkside, the — Rossville, GA · overall 3/5
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 21 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "Who leads your infection prevention program, and how do you make sure staff follow practices like hand hygiene every day?"
- "How do you explain health changes and treatment options to residents and their families?"
- "What percentage of your residents are on antipsychotic or sedating medications, and how do you work to reduce that?"
- "Can you tell me what this citation involved and what steps you took to bring care back up to standard?"
- "Can you show me how medications are stored and secured on the units, including controlled drugs?"
- "Can I see a sample menu, and how do you handle special diets like low-sodium or diabetic meals?"
- "How do you decide you have enough staff and resources for your resident population, including nights and weekends?"
- "How many hours a day is a registered nurse physically in the building, including weekends?"
Also worth asking anywhere
- "Your weekend nurse staffing is reported below the New Hampshire midpoint — how does the weekend schedule differ from a weekday?"
- "Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
- "CMS reports 40% total nursing staff turnover here — who on the care team has been with you longest?"
- "Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"
Nearby facilities (12 closest of 14 within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pheasant Wood Center | 8.0 mi | Peterborough, NH | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Alliance Health at Baldwinville | 13.7 mi | Baldwinville, MA | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Alpine Healthcare Center | 15.9 mi | Keene, NH | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Wachusett Manor | 16.2 mi | Gardner, MA | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Gardner Rehabilitation and Nursing Center | 16.4 mi | Gardner, MA | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Langdon Place of Keene | 16.8 mi | Keene, NH | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Highlands, the | 17.6 mi | Fitchburg, MA | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Crestwood Center | 17.7 mi | Milford, NH | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Keene Center, Genesis Healthcare | 17.8 mi | Keene, NH | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| The Elms Center | 18.0 mi | Milford, NH | ★★☆☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Fitchburg Healthcare | 18.1 mi | Fitchburg, MA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Applewood Center | 19.2 mi | Winchester, NH | ★★★★★ | 5/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
Other facilities in the same county
CMS records place this facility in Cheshire, NH — 7 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
- Cheshire County Home — Westmoreland, NH · overall 4/5
- Covenant Living of Keene — Keene, NH · overall 4/5
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 305072.
This page is the printable visit checklist. If your browser did not open the print dialog automatically, use File → Print (Ctrl/⌘-P).