7201 Greenboro Dr, West Melbourne, FL 32904 (opens Google Maps) · Brevard County · (321) 727-0990· 179 certified beds · avg 169 residents/day · certified since Aug 29, 1989 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: ASTON HEALTH (38 facilities, chain avg rating 2.7★)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 2/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
▲ Immediate jeopardy, isolated · Mar 15, 2025 · F-0600 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.
Why it matters: Abuse and neglect cause direct physical and emotional harm and are among the most serious failures a nursing home can have.
Severity (J): Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety was cited. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Apr 11, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
▲ Immediate jeopardy, isolated · Mar 15, 2025 · F-0610 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do.
Why it matters: When allegations aren't investigated, harm to residents can continue unchecked.
Severity (J): Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety was cited. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Apr 11, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
▲ Immediate jeopardy, isolated · Mar 15, 2025 · F-0835 · triggered by a complaint
The facility was not managed in a way that uses its money, staff, and resources effectively and efficiently to care for residents.
Why it matters: Poor administration often shows up as understaffing, supply shortages, and care problems across the whole facility.
Severity (J): Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety was cited. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Apr 11, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
Showing the latest 3 of 16 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint F-0600
The facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. · from a complaint F-0610
The facility was not managed in a way that uses its money, staff, and resources effectively and efficiently to care for residents. · from a complaint F-0835
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 15, 2025 | ▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, isolated | The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint · F-0600 |
| Mar 15, 2025 | ▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, isolated | The facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. · from a complaint · F-0610 |
| Mar 15, 2025 | ▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, isolated | The facility was not managed in a way that uses its money, staff, and resources effectively and efficiently to care for residents. · from a complaint · F-0835 |
| Mar 15, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not properly complete the required screening (called PASARR) that identifies whether a person entering a nursing home has a mental illness or intellectual disability and needs specialized services. · from a complaint · F-0645 |
| Feb 5, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not safely and appropriately administer IV fluids (fluids given through a vein) for residents who needed them. · from a complaint · F-0694 |
| Sep 13, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not coordinate resident assessments with the state's pre-admission screening program for mental illness and intellectual disabilities, or failed to refer residents for the special services they need. · F-0644 |
| Sep 13, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have a written plan describing how it runs its quality improvement program — the ongoing process of finding problems in care and fixing them. · F-0865 |
| Sep 13, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · F-0550 |
| Sep 13, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not properly complete the required screening (called PASARR) that identifies whether a person entering a nursing home has a mental illness or intellectual disability and needs specialized services. · F-0645 |
| Jan 26, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not honor residents' right to make their own choices about their daily lives, such as when to wake up, what to eat, or how to spend their time. · F-0561 |
| Jan 26, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · F-0677 |
| Jan 26, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline. · F-0688 |
| Jan 26, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · F-0695 |
| Mar 18, 2021 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · F-0584 |
| Mar 18, 2021 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide proper foot care for residents. Foot care includes routine care like nail trimming and attention to foot problems, which matter greatly for older adults. · F-0687 |
| Mar 18, 2021 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (4 → 4).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 3 | 0 | E |
| 2023 | 4 | 0 | D |
| 2024 | 4 | 0 | E |
| 2025 | 5 | 3 | J ▲ |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
1 fine totaling $74,386.
Every penalty CMS publishes for this facility in the 3-year window is listed —none excluded. The count and the dollar total come from two different CMS datasets and agree for this facility. Penalties older than the window are dropped by CMS before publication, not by us.
| Date | Type | Amount / length |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 15, 2025 | Fine | $74,386 |
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Florida avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 4.03 | 4.03 | 3.95 | top 36% in Florida; top 38% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.60 | 0.76 | 0.69 | bottom 40% in Florida; top 48% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 3.72 | 3.68 | 3.50 | top 34% in Florida; top 32% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.46 | 0.53 | 0.48 | top 48% in Florida; top 38% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 50.0 | 41.4 | 45.8 | bottom 28% in Florida; bottom 38% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 34.8 | 46.0 | 42.9 | top 28% in Florida; top 38% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.55, RN 0.53, weekend 3.28.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.55 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 4/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 2/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 1/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Indian River Center. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Corporation
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Friedman, Leopold | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/15/2023 |
| Gabriel Living Center, LLC | Organization | Direct Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2003 |
| Gutman, Samuel | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2021 |
| Indian River Holdco LLC | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/15/2023 |
| Lce Partners LLC | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2021 |
| Aston Healthcare LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/03/2025 |
| Davis Everett, Brenda | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/22/2024 |
| Davis Everett, Brenda | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/22/2024 |
| Davis Everett, Brenda | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/03/2025 |
| Patel, Gaurang | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/30/2025 |
| Perri, Rosemarie | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/14/2022 |
| Perri, Rosemarie | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/14/2022 |
| Placeres, Crystal | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/29/2022 |
| Thacker, Tricia | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/05/2022 |
All 14 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.
CMS lists this facility under the chain Aston Health — 38 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 37 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| West Melbourne Health & Rehabilitation Center | 1.6 mi | West Melbourne, FL | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Nursing & Rehabilitation Center of Melbourne | 1.9 mi | Melbourne, FL | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Melbourne Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center | 3.8 mi | Melbourne, FL | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Life Care Center of Melbourne | 3.8 mi | Melbourne, FL | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Avante at Melbourne INC | 3.8 mi | Melbourne, FL | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Melbourne Terrace Rehabilitation Center | 4.0 mi | Melbourne, FL | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Atlantic Shores Nursing and Rehab Center | 4.3 mi | Melbourne, FL | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Aviata at Palm Bay | 6.4 mi | Palm Bay, FL | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Anchor Care & Rehabilitation Center | 6.7 mi | Palm Bay, FL | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Life Care Center of Palm Bay | 7.5 mi | Palm Bay, FL | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Viera Del Mar Health and Rehabilitation Center | 9.1 mi | Viera, FL | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Viera Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center | 10.1 mi | Viera, FL | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
CMS records place this facility in Brevard, FL — 21 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 105673.
This page is the printable visit checklist. If your browser did not open the print dialog automatically, use File → Print (Ctrl/⌘-P).
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details