FloridaMelbourne

Avante at Melbourne INC

1420 South Oak Street, Melbourne, FL 32901 · Brevard County · 110 certified beds · avg 91 residents/day · certified since Jul 1, 1989

Part of chain: AVANTE CENTERS (11 facilities, chain avg rating 2.5★)

1/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
5
Serious findings on record
$87,952
Fines, last 3 years
3.86
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★☆☆☆☆1/5 · CMS overall rating: 2/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Nov 17, 2023 · F-0600 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.

Why it matters: Abuse and neglect cause direct physical and emotional harm and are among the most serious failures a nursing home can have.

Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.

Corrected: Dec 16, 2023 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Nov 17, 2023 · F-0635 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not have doctor's orders in place for a resident's immediate care at the time the resident was admitted.

Why it matters: Without admission orders, a new resident may miss critical medications or treatments during their first days.

Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.

Corrected: Dec 16, 2023 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Nov 17, 2023 · F-0726 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not make sure its nurses and nurse aides had the skills and training needed to properly care for every resident.

Why it matters: Undertrained caregivers are more likely to miss warning signs and make care mistakes.

Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.

Corrected: Dec 16, 2023 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Apr 10, 2025 · F-0600 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.

Why it matters: Abuse and neglect cause direct physical and emotional harm and are among the most serious failures a nursing home can have.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: May 10, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Apr 10, 2025 · F-0840 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not bring in qualified outside professionals to provide a required service when it didn't have a qualified professional on staff.

Why it matters: Residents can go without required services — like therapy or dietitian care — that no one qualified is providing.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: May 10, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (38)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Jul 28, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not safely and appropriately administer IV fluids (fluids given through a vein) for residents who needed them. · from a complaint
Jul 28, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · from a complaint
Apr 10, 2025▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint
Apr 10, 2025▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not bring in qualified outside professionals to provide a required service when it didn't have a qualified professional on staff. · from a complaint
Feb 14, 2025F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not provide food that accounts for each resident's allergies, intolerances, and personal preferences, or did not offer appealing alternatives.
Feb 14, 2025F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Feb 14, 2025F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not properly inform residents or their representatives about arbitration agreements — contracts that give up the right to sue in court — including their right to refuse to sign.
Feb 14, 2025F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not have a written plan describing how it runs its quality improvement program — the ongoing process of finding problems in care and fixing them.
Feb 14, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs.
Feb 14, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not allow residents to take their own medications when a clinical review showed they could do so safely. Residents have this right if their care team determines it's appropriate.
Feb 14, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups.
Feb 14, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not coordinate resident assessments with the state's pre-admission screening program for mental illness and intellectual disabilities, or failed to refer residents for the special services they need.
Feb 14, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Feb 14, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration.
Feb 14, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Feb 14, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist.
Jun 6, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · from a complaint
Jan 9, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Jan 9, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away. · from a complaint
Jan 9, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · from a complaint
Nov 17, 2023▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint
Nov 17, 2023▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-offThe facility did not have doctor's orders in place for a resident's immediate care at the time the resident was admitted. · from a complaint
Nov 17, 2023▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-offThe facility did not make sure its nurses and nurse aides had the skills and training needed to properly care for every resident. · from a complaint
Nov 17, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint
Nov 17, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. · from a complaint
Nov 17, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · from a complaint
Jun 15, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
Jun 15, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not let a resident help develop and carry out their own plan of care — the written roadmap of the services and support they'll receive, built around their personal goals and preferences.
Jun 15, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care.
Jun 15, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not coordinate resident assessments with the state's pre-admission screening program for mental illness and intellectual disabilities, or failed to refer residents for the special services they need.
Jun 15, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not properly complete the required screening (called PASARR) that identifies whether a person entering a nursing home has a mental illness or intellectual disability and needs specialized services.
Jun 15, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' individual preferences, choices, values, and beliefs in their daily life and care.
Jun 15, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not safely and appropriately administer IV fluids (fluids given through a vein) for residents who needed them.
Jun 15, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide food that accounts for each resident's allergies, intolerances, and personal preferences, or did not offer appealing alternatives.
Jun 15, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Jul 29, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
Jul 29, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Jul 29, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (9 → 12).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202130D
2023153J ▲
202440E
2025162G ▲

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

2 fines totaling $87,952, plus 1 Medicare payment denial period.

DateTypeAmount / length
Apr 10, 2025Fine$46,176
Nov 17, 2023Fine$41,776
Nov 17, 2023Payment Denial34 days from Dec 28, 2023

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityFlorida avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.864.033.95bottom 49% in Florida; top 46% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.490.760.69bottom 21% in Florida; bottom 36% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.513.683.50bottom 49% in Florida; top 41% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.270.530.48bottom 16% in Florida; bottom 26% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)36.041.445.8top 35% in Florida; top 26% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)28.646.042.9top 17% in Florida; top 26% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.60, RN 0.46, weekend 3.28. Staffing rating: 3/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 4/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Ag Holdings, INC.Organization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%08/17/2000
Debbie Klurman 1994 TrustOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest8%06/20/1989
Deena Klurman Kranz 2000 TrustOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest8%06/20/1989
Mona Mizrachi 1994 TrustOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest8%06/20/1989
Sisel Klurman 2001 Revocable TrustOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest25%04/09/2010
Biegasiewicz, KimberlyIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE02/04/2022
Biegasiewicz, KimberlyIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE02/04/2022
Biegasiewicz, KimberlyIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE02/04/2022
Caiati, DeniseIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2026
Chopra, ShawnIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2026
Hornack, JohnIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE04/24/2019

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Melbourne Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center0.5 miMelbourne, FL★☆☆☆☆1/5
Life Care Center of Melbourne0.7 miMelbourne, FL★★★★★4/5
Melbourne Terrace Rehabilitation Center1.7 miMelbourne, FL★★★★☆3/5
Atlantic Shores Nursing and Rehab Center2.4 miMelbourne, FL★★★★☆4/5
West Melbourne Health & Rehabilitation Center2.5 miWest Melbourne, FL★★☆☆☆2/5
Indian River Center3.8 miWest Melbourne, FL★★☆☆☆2/5
Anchor Care & Rehabilitation Center4.2 miPalm Bay, FL★★★★☆4/5
Aviata at Palm Bay4.5 miPalm Bay, FL★★★★☆4/5
Nursing & Rehabilitation Center of Melbourne4.8 miMelbourne, FL★★☆☆☆2/5
Life Care Center of Palm Bay5.6 miPalm Bay, FL★★★★★4/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Melbourne →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 105671.