2100 N W Barry Road, Kansas City, MO 64154 (opens Google Maps) · Platte County · (816) 521-6610· 90 certified beds · avg 86 residents/day · certified since Nov 9, 2018 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: IGNITE MEDICAL RESORTS (22 facilities, chain avg rating 2.7★)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
▲ Actual harm, isolated · Jan 9, 2025 · F-0600 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.
Why it matters: Abuse and neglect cause direct physical and emotional harm and are among the most serious failures a nursing home can have.
Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Jan 2, 2025 (Past Non-Compliance)
Showing the latest 3 of 30 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. F-0689
The facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections. F-0690
The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. F-0812
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Feb 11, 2026 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689 |
| Feb 11, 2026 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections. · F-0690 |
| Feb 11, 2026 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Feb 11, 2026 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Feb 11, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · from a complaint · F-0550 |
| Feb 11, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · F-0658 |
| Feb 11, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · F-0677 |
| Feb 11, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not prepare and serve food in a form that meets each resident's individual needs — for example, chopped, pureed, or softened food for residents with chewing or swallowing problems. · F-0805 |
| Jan 9, 2025 | ▲ G · Actual harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint · F-0600 |
| Dec 2, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not properly prepare residents for a safe transfer or discharge. Before a resident leaves, the facility must get them ready and make sure the move is safe and orderly. · from a complaint · F-0624 |
| Oct 3, 2024 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not employ enough qualified food and nutrition staff, including a qualified dietician, to properly run its food service. · F-0801 |
| Oct 3, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not give residents (and their representatives and the ombudsman, a state advocate for residents) proper advance notice before a transfer or discharge, including information about their right to appeal. · F-0623 |
| Oct 3, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not properly prepare residents for a safe transfer or discharge. Before a resident leaves, the facility must get them ready and make sure the move is safe and orderly. · F-0624 |
| Oct 3, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not give the resident or their representative written notice of how long it would hold the resident's bed during a hospital stay or approved leave. · F-0625 |
| Oct 3, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · F-0684 |
| Oct 3, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures for offering residents flu and pneumonia vaccinations. · F-0883 |
| Oct 3, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · F-0550 |
| Oct 3, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide proper care for residents with a colostomy, urostomy, or ileostomy — surgical openings in the abdomen that let waste leave the body into a pouch. These require regular, skilled attention to stay clean and healthy. · F-0691 |
| Jun 6, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint · F-0689 |
| Jul 25, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · F-0550 |
| Jul 25, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · F-0584 |
| Jul 25, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · F-0657 |
| Jul 25, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · F-0677 |
| Jul 25, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · F-0684 |
| Jul 25, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have enough nursing staff each day to meet every resident's needs, or did not have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift. Adequate staffing is one of the strongest predictors of good care. · F-0725 |
| Jul 25, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not serve food and drinks that were appetizing, attractive, and at a safe and pleasant temperature. · F-0804 |
| Jul 25, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide food that accounts for each resident's allergies, intolerances, and personal preferences, or did not offer appealing alternatives. · F-0806 |
| Jul 25, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not serve meals and snacks at times that fit residents' needs, preferences, and requests, or did not offer nourishing alternatives for residents who want to eat outside scheduled meal times. · F-0809 |
| Jul 25, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups. · F-0558 |
| Jul 25, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · F-0658 |
Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (8 → 8).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 11 | 0 | E |
| 2024 | 10 | 0 | F |
| 2025 | 1 | 1 | G ▲ |
| 2026 | 8 | 0 | E |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
1 fine totaling $6,368.
Every penalty CMS publishes for this facility in the 3-year window is listed —none excluded. The count and the dollar total come from two different CMS datasets and agree for this facility. Penalties older than the window are dropped by CMS before publication, not by us.
| Date | Type | Amount / length |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 9, 2025 | Fine | $6,368 |
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Missouri avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 2.74 | 3.66 | 3.95 | bottom 16% in Missouri; bottom 7% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.56 | 0.49 | 0.69 | top 29% in Missouri; bottom 46% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 2.38 | 3.22 | 3.50 | bottom 16% in Missouri; bottom 6% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.42 | 0.33 | 0.48 | top 18% in Missouri; top 45% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 50.0 | 56.0 | 45.8 | top 32% in Missouri; bottom 38% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 23.5 | 47.8 | 42.9 | top 18% in Missouri; top 19% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.47, RN 0.70, weekend 3.01.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.47 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 2/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Ignite Medical Resort Kansas City, LLC. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Limited Liability company
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Carr, Jared | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/15/2018 |
| Falk, Molly | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/15/2018 |
| Gobst, Ryan | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/15/2018 |
| Gold Pearl, LLC | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/15/2018 |
| Hageman Family Tr | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 30% | 06/05/2018 |
| Hageman Investments LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 50% | 06/05/2018 |
| Hageman, Sandra | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/11/2018 |
| Hageman, Shane | Individual | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 5% | 06/11/2018 |
| Hageman, Steve | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/11/2018 |
| Ignite KC JV LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 25% | 12/19/2018 |
| Ignite KC LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 50% | 06/05/2018 |
| Ignite V-JV LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 25% | 12/19/2018 |
| Israel Family Investment Trust | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/15/2018 |
| Israel Investment Tr | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/15/2018 |
| Jablonski, Nicole | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/15/2018 |
| McFarlane, John | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/15/2018 |
| Prestige Worldwide KC LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 5% | 06/05/2018 |
| Rogers, Dylan | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2024 |
| Rose, Marc | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/30/2020 |
| The Hageman Family Delaware Trust I | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/29/2020 |
Showing 20 of 64 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 44 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.
CMS lists this facility under the chain Ignite Medical Resorts — 22 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 21 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Northland Rehabilitation & Health Care Center | 2.0 mi | Kansas City, MO | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Linden Woods Village | 2.4 mi | Gladstone, MO | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Pleasant Valley Manor Care Center | 3.1 mi | Liberty, MO | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| McCrite Plaza at Briarcliff Skilled Facility | 4.2 mi | Kansas City, MO | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Pinnacle Point Wellness & Rehabilitation | 5.1 mi | Riverside, MO | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Parkview Healthcare | 5.5 mi | Kansas City, MO | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuseSFF |
| Avalon View Health and Wellness | 6.0 mi | Liberty, MO | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Myers Nursing & Convalescent Center | 7.5 mi | Kansas City, MO | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Maywood Terrace Living Center | 7.7 mi | Independence, MO | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| New Mark Rehab and Healthcare Center | 7.8 mi | Kansas City, MO | ★☆☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Tiffany Springs Rehabilitation & Health Care Cente | 8.0 mi | Kansas City, MO | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Norterre | 8.1 mi | Liberty, MO | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
CMS records place this facility in Platte, MO — 4 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 265872.
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details