Ignite Medical Resort Kansas City, LLC
2100 N W Barry Road, Kansas City, MO 64154 · Platte County · 90 certified beds · avg 86 residents/day · certified since Nov 9, 2018
Part of chain: IGNITE MEDICAL RESORTS (22 facilities, chain avg rating 2.7★)
3/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
1
Serious findings on record
$6,368
Fines, last 3 years
2.74
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.
Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)
▲ Actual harm, one-off · Jan 9, 2025 · F-0600 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.
Why it matters: Abuse and neglect cause direct physical and emotional harm and are among the most serious failures a nursing home can have.
Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.
Corrected: Jan 2, 2025 (Past Non-Compliance)
All citations in the current public record (30)
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Feb 11, 2026 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. |
| Feb 11, 2026 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections. |
| Feb 11, 2026 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. |
| Feb 11, 2026 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. |
| Feb 11, 2026 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · from a complaint |
| Feb 11, 2026 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. |
| Feb 11, 2026 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. |
| Feb 11, 2026 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not prepare and serve food in a form that meets each resident's individual needs — for example, chopped, pureed, or softened food for residents with chewing or swallowing problems. |
| Jan 9, 2025 | ▲ G · Actual harm, one-off | The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint |
| Dec 2, 2024 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not properly prepare residents for a safe transfer or discharge. Before a resident leaves, the facility must get them ready and make sure the move is safe and orderly. · from a complaint |
| Oct 3, 2024 | F · Potential for harm, facility-wide | The facility did not employ enough qualified food and nutrition staff, including a qualified dietician, to properly run its food service. |
| Oct 3, 2024 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not give residents (and their representatives and the ombudsman, a state advocate for residents) proper advance notice before a transfer or discharge, including information about their right to appeal. |
| Oct 3, 2024 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not properly prepare residents for a safe transfer or discharge. Before a resident leaves, the facility must get them ready and make sure the move is safe and orderly. |
| Oct 3, 2024 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not give the resident or their representative written notice of how long it would hold the resident's bed during a hospital stay or approved leave. |
| Oct 3, 2024 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. |
| Oct 3, 2024 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures for offering residents flu and pneumonia vaccinations. |
| Oct 3, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. |
| Oct 3, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide proper care for residents with a colostomy, urostomy, or ileostomy — surgical openings in the abdomen that let waste leave the body into a pouch. These require regular, skilled attention to stay clean and healthy. |
| Jun 6, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint |
| Jul 25, 2023 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. |
| Jul 25, 2023 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. |
| Jul 25, 2023 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. |
| Jul 25, 2023 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. |
| Jul 25, 2023 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. |
| Jul 25, 2023 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not have enough nursing staff each day to meet every resident's needs, or did not have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift. Adequate staffing is one of the strongest predictors of good care. |
| Jul 25, 2023 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not serve food and drinks that were appetizing, attractive, and at a safe and pleasant temperature. |
| Jul 25, 2023 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not provide food that accounts for each resident's allergies, intolerances, and personal preferences, or did not offer appealing alternatives. |
| Jul 25, 2023 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not serve meals and snacks at times that fit residents' needs, preferences, and requests, or did not offer nourishing alternatives for residents who want to eat outside scheduled meal times. |
| Jul 25, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups. |
| Jul 25, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (8 → 8).
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 11 | 0 | E |
| 2024 | 10 | 0 | F |
| 2025 | 1 | 1 | G ▲ |
| 2026 | 8 | 0 | E |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
1 fine totaling $6,368.
| Date | Type | Amount / length |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 9, 2025 | Fine | $6,368 |
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
| Measure | This facility | Missouri avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 2.74 | 3.66 | 3.95 | bottom 16% in Missouri; bottom 7% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.56 | 0.49 | 0.69 | top 29% in Missouri; bottom 46% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 2.38 | 3.22 | 3.50 | bottom 16% in Missouri; bottom 6% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.42 | 0.33 | 0.48 | top 18% in Missouri; top 45% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 50.0 | 56.0 | 45.8 | top 32% in Missouri; bottom 38% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 23.5 | 47.8 | 42.9 | top 18% in Missouri; top 19% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.47, RN 0.70, weekend 3.01. Staffing rating: 2/5.
Self-reported quality measures
Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.
Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5
Who owns this facility
For profit - Limited Liability company
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Carr, Jared | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/15/2018 |
| Falk, Molly | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/15/2018 |
| Gobst, Ryan | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/15/2018 |
| Gold Pearl, LLC | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/15/2018 |
| Hageman Family Tr | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 30% | 06/05/2018 |
| Hageman Investments LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 50% | 06/05/2018 |
| Hageman, Sandra | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/11/2018 |
| Hageman, Shane | Individual | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 5% | 06/11/2018 |
| Hageman, Steve | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/11/2018 |
| Ignite KC JV LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 25% | 12/19/2018 |
| Ignite KC LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 50% | 06/05/2018 |
| Ignite V-JV LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 25% | 12/19/2018 |
| Israel Family Investment Trust | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/15/2018 |
| Israel Investment Tr | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/15/2018 |
| Jablonski, Nicole | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/15/2018 |
| McFarlane, John | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/15/2018 |
| Prestige Worldwide KC LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 5% | 06/05/2018 |
| Rogers, Dylan | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2024 |
| Rose, Marc | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/30/2020 |
| The Hageman Family Delaware Trust I | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/29/2020 |
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "Tell me about this abuse or neglect citation — what happened, and what specific changes did you make afterward?"
- "What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
- "How do you care for residents with incontinence or catheters, and what do you do to prevent urinary tract infections?"
- "What did your most recent kitchen inspection find, and can I see how food is stored and prepared?"
- "Who leads your infection prevention program, and how do you make sure staff follow practices like hand hygiene every day?"
- "Can you give me examples of how your staff protect residents' dignity in everyday care, like bathing and dressing?"
- "Can you tell me what this citation involved and what steps you took to bring care back up to standard?"
- "How many aides are on each shift, and how do you make sure every resident gets timely help with bathing, dressing, and meals?"
- "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
- "Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"
Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Northland Rehabilitation & Health Care Center | 2.1 mi | Kansas City, MO | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Linden Woods Village | 2.4 mi | Gladstone, MO | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Pleasant Valley Manor Care Center | 3.1 mi | Liberty, MO | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| McCrite Plaza at Briarcliff Skilled Facility | 4.2 mi | Kansas City, MO | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Pinnacle Point Wellness & Rehabilitation | 5.1 mi | Riverside, MO | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Parkview Healthcare | 5.5 mi | Kansas City, MO | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuseSFF |
| Avalon View Health and Wellness | 6.0 mi | Liberty, MO | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Myers Nursing & Convalescent Center | 7.5 mi | Kansas City, MO | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Maywood Terrace Living Center | 7.7 mi | Independence, MO | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| New Mark Rehab and Healthcare Center | 7.8 mi | Kansas City, MO | ★☆☆☆☆ | 2/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
All facilities in Kansas City →
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 265872.