Northland Rehabilitation & Health Care Center
4301 NE Parvin Road, Kansas City, MO 64117 · Clay County · 118 certified beds · avg 101 residents/day · certified since Aug 7, 2018
Part of chain: TUTERA SENIOR LIVING & HEALTH CARE (25 facilities, chain avg rating 2.0★)
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.
Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)
▲ Actual harm, one-off · Apr 21, 2026 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.
Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.
Corrected: Apr 20, 2026 (Past Non-Compliance)
All citations in the current public record (20)
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 21, 2026 | ▲ G · Actual harm, one-off | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint |
| Dec 30, 2025 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not serve meals and snacks at times that fit residents' needs, preferences, and requests, or did not offer nourishing alternatives for residents who want to eat outside scheduled meal times. · from a complaint |
| Jul 24, 2025 | F · Potential for harm, facility-wide | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. |
| Jul 24, 2025 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. |
| Jul 24, 2025 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not honor residents' right to make their own choices about their daily lives, such as when to wake up, what to eat, or how to spend their time. |
| Jul 24, 2025 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not properly notify residents about the balance of money it holds for them, or failed to return those funds when a resident was discharged, evicted, or died. |
| Jul 24, 2025 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility hired someone with an official finding of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or theft against them. Facilities are not allowed to employ people with such findings. |
| Jul 24, 2025 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. |
| Jul 24, 2025 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. |
| Jul 24, 2025 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. |
| Jul 24, 2025 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not maintain an effective pest control program to prevent or deal with mice, insects, or other pests. |
| Jul 24, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. |
| Jun 28, 2024 | F · Potential for harm, facility-wide | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. |
| Jun 28, 2024 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. |
| Jun 28, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. |
| Jun 28, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. |
| Jun 28, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. |
| Jun 28, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. |
| Jun 28, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits. |
| Nov 8, 2023 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not allow residents to take their own medications when a clinical review showed they could do so safely. Residents have this right if their care team determines it's appropriate. · from a complaint |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (7 → 10).
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 1 | 0 | E |
| 2024 | 7 | 0 | F |
| 2025 | 11 | 0 | F |
| 2026 | 1 | 1 | G ▲ |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
| Measure | This facility | Missouri avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.87 | 3.66 | 3.95 | top 39% in Missouri; top 45% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.42 | 0.49 | 0.69 | top 49% in Missouri; bottom 25% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 3.33 | 3.22 | 3.50 | top 42% in Missouri; bottom 49% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.32 | 0.33 | 0.48 | top 38% in Missouri; bottom 35% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 60.9 | 56.0 | 45.8 | bottom 39% in Missouri; bottom 15% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 56.3 | 47.8 | 42.9 | bottom 38% in Missouri; bottom 26% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.86, RN 0.42, weekend 3.32. Staffing rating: 2/5.
Self-reported quality measures
Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.
Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 2/5
Who owns this facility
For profit - Limited Liability company
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tutera Group, INC | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 100% | 01/18/2017 |
| Bloom, Randall | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/18/2017 |
| Brooks, Kiley | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2013 |
| Brooks, Kiley | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/18/2017 |
| Tutera, Joseph | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/18/2017 |
| Walnut Creek Management Company LLC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/18/2017 |
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
- "What happens if a resident is hungry between meals or misses a mealtime — what food options are available?"
- "What did your most recent kitchen inspection find, and can I see how food is stored and prepared?"
- "Can you give me examples of how your staff protect residents' dignity in everyday care, like bathing and dressing?"
- "What choices do residents have over their daily schedule, like meal times, bathing, and activities?"
- "If you manage my family member's personal funds, how often will we get statements and how quickly are funds returned?"
- "How do you screen job applicants for past findings of abuse, neglect, or theft before hiring?"
- "How many residents here use oxygen or breathing equipment, and who checks that equipment each shift?"
- "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
- "Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"
Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ignite Medical Resort Kansas City, LLC | 2.0 mi | Kansas City, MO | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Parkview Healthcare | 3.4 mi | Kansas City, MO | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuseSFF |
| McCrite Plaza at Briarcliff Skilled Facility | 3.6 mi | Kansas City, MO | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Linden Woods Village | 4.4 mi | Gladstone, MO | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Pleasant Valley Manor Care Center | 4.6 mi | Liberty, MO | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Pinnacle Point Wellness & Rehabilitation | 4.9 mi | Riverside, MO | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Myers Nursing & Convalescent Center | 5.5 mi | Kansas City, MO | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Maywood Terrace Living Center | 6.0 mi | Independence, MO | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Rosewood Rehab and Healthcare Center | 6.8 mi | Independence, MO | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | abuse |
| Independence Manor Care Center | 7.4 mi | Independence, MO | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Clara Manor Nursing Home | 7.5 mi | Kansas City, MO | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
| Avalon View Health and Wellness | 7.5 mi | Liberty, MO | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
All facilities in Kansas City →
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 265870.