IndianaCorydon

Harrison Healthcare Center

150 Beechmont Dr, Corydon, IN 47112 · Harrison County · 92 certified beds · avg 75 residents/day · certified since Aug 7, 1998

Part of chain: COMMUNICARE HEALTH (110 facilities, chain avg rating 3.2★)

3/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
1
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
3.27
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Sep 19, 2023 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Sep 25, 2023 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (31)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Jan 29, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections.
Jan 29, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · from a complaint
Aug 6, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint
Aug 6, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections. · from a complaint
Aug 6, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · from a complaint
Aug 6, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · from a complaint
Dec 18, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Dec 18, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
Dec 18, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not safely and appropriately administer IV fluids (fluids given through a vein) for residents who needed them.
Dec 18, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents' medications free from unnecessary drugs. Residents should only take medicines they truly need, at the right dose, for a clear reason.
Dec 18, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide timely, quality laboratory tests to meet residents' needs.
Oct 18, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not keep its building and grounds safe, functional, clean, and comfortable for residents, staff, and visitors. · from a complaint
Jun 10, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint
Jun 10, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not keep its building and grounds safe, functional, clean, and comfortable for residents, staff, and visitors. · from a complaint
Jun 10, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · from a complaint
Nov 8, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have a registered nurse on duty at least 8 hours a day, or did not have a registered nurse serving full-time as director of nursing.
Nov 8, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not allow residents to take their own medications when a clinical review showed they could do so safely. Residents have this right if their care team determines it's appropriate.
Nov 8, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
Nov 8, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Nov 8, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Nov 8, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections. · from a complaint
Nov 8, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide proper care for residents with a colostomy, urostomy, or ileostomy — surgical openings in the abdomen that let waste leave the body into a pouch. These require regular, skilled attention to stay clean and healthy.
Nov 8, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · from a complaint
Nov 8, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the social services residents need — such as counseling, help with adjustment, or connecting to outside resources — to achieve the best possible quality of life.
Nov 8, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist.
Nov 8, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Nov 8, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures for offering residents flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
Nov 8, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep all essential equipment working safely — things like heating and cooling systems, kitchen equipment, and medical devices.
Sep 19, 2023▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Sep 6, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away. · from a complaint
Sep 6, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (5 → 2).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
2023161G ▲
202490E
202540D
202620D

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityIndiana avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.273.423.95bottom 50% in Indiana; bottom 25% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.370.620.69bottom 13% in Indiana; bottom 17% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.013.013.50top 40% in Indiana; bottom 32% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.260.470.48bottom 14% in Indiana; bottom 23% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)41.045.945.8top 36% in Indiana; top 39% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)42.940.442.9bottom 47% in Indiana; bottom 49% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.34, RN 0.37, weekend 3.08. Staffing rating: 2/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 4/5

Who owns this facility

Non profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Adams County Memorial HospitalOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2023
Beechmont II Mgt Co LLCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE09/01/2017
Beechmont II Mgt Co LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE09/01/2017
Blue Management Services LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2023
Borne-Bauman, CandiceIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2023
Borne-Bauman, CandiceIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2023
First Bank of BerneOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2023
Flueckiger, RussellIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2023
Flueckiger, RussellIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2023
Lehman, ScottIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2023
Lehman, ScottIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2023
Macklin, LarryIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2023
Macklin, LarryIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2023
Masroor, MuhammadIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2020
Masroor, MuhammadIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE12/10/2025
McIntire, DavidIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2023
McIntire, DavidIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2023
Odenthal, RichardIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE09/01/2017
Omega Healthcare Investors INCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE09/01/2017
Omg in MSTR Lsco LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE12/10/2025

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Indian Creek Healthcare Center0.2 miCorydon, IN★★★☆☆2/5abuse
Harrison Springs Health Campus2.8 miCorydon, IN★★★★★4/5
Waters of Georgetown, the10.9 miGeorgetown, IN★☆☆☆☆1/5
Todd-Dickey Nursing and Rehabilitation12.8 miLeavenworth, IN★★★★★4/5
Brandenburg Nursing and Rehabilitation Center14.5 miBrandenburg, KY★★★☆☆4/5
Signature Healthcare at Summerfield Rehab & Wellne15.3 miLouisville, KY★★☆☆☆1/5
Signature Healthcare at Rockford Rehab & Wellness15.4 miLouisville, KY★★★★★5/5
Villages at Historic Silvercrest the15.9 miNew Albany, IN★★★★☆4/5
Park Terrace Health Campus16.3 miLouisville, KY★★★★☆4/5
Parkwood Health & Rehabilitation17.0 miLouisville, KY★☆☆☆☆2/5
Lincoln Hills of New Albany17.1 miNew Albany, IN★★★★☆3/5
Autumn Woods Health Campus17.2 miNew Albany, IN★★★★★4/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Corydon →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 155657.