KentuckyLouisville

Signature Healthcare at Summerfield Rehab & Wellne

1877 Farnley Road, Louisville, KY 40216 · Jefferson County · 165 certified beds · avg 110 residents/day · certified since Nov 1, 1991

Part of chain: SIGNATURE HEALTHCARE (67 facilities, chain avg rating 3.1★)

1/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
5
Serious findings on record
$182,488
Fines, last 3 years
3.59
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★☆☆☆☆1/5 · CMS overall rating: 2/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, repeated · Sep 20, 2024 · F-0623 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not give residents (and their representatives and the ombudsman, a state advocate for residents) proper advance notice before a transfer or discharge, including information about their right to appeal.

Why it matters: Without notice and appeal rights, a resident can be moved out with no warning and no chance to object.

Severity (K): A life-threatening or extremely dangerous situation affected several residents. Among the most serious findings an inspection can produce.

Corrected: Oct 15, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Jan 28, 2024 · F-0880

The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.

Why it matters: Weak infection control lets illnesses like flu, COVID-19, and drug-resistant infections spread quickly among vulnerable residents.

Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.

Corrected: Feb 28, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Sep 20, 2024 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Oct 15, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Jan 28, 2024 · F-0656

The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.

Why it matters: Without a complete, working care plan, important needs can slip through the cracks and no one is accountable for results.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Feb 28, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Jan 28, 2024 · F-0677

The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.

Why it matters: Residents who don't get this help can suffer poor hygiene, skin breakdown, weight loss, and a loss of dignity.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Feb 28, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (28)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Sep 20, 2024▲ K · Immediate jeopardy, repeatedThe facility did not give residents (and their representatives and the ombudsman, a state advocate for residents) proper advance notice before a transfer or discharge, including information about their right to appeal. · from a complaint
Sep 20, 2024▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Sep 20, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · from a complaint
Sep 20, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · from a complaint
Sep 20, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint
Jan 28, 2024▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Jan 28, 2024▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Jan 28, 2024▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
Jan 28, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Jan 28, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not conduct and document a facility-wide assessment of what staff, supplies, and resources it needs to care for its residents properly — during everyday operations, nights, weekends, and emergencies.
Jan 28, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · from a complaint
Jan 28, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Jan 28, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Jan 28, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
Jan 28, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' right to make their own choices about their daily lives, such as when to wake up, what to eat, or how to spend their time.
Jan 28, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away. · from a complaint
Jan 28, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Jan 28, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration.
Jan 28, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it.
Jan 28, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist.
Jan 28, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility's menus did not meet residents' nutritional needs, or were not prepared in advance, followed as written, kept up to date, or reviewed by a dietician.
Jan 28, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not serve food and drinks that were appetizing, attractive, and at a safe and pleasant temperature.
Oct 5, 2019D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' right to manage their own money and financial affairs.
Oct 5, 2019D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not enter each resident's assessment information into the required format and send it to the state within 7 days of completing the assessment, as the rules require.
Oct 5, 2019D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Oct 5, 2019D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe, appropriate care for residents who need dialysis — the treatment that filters the blood when kidneys fail.
Oct 5, 2019D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Oct 5, 2019D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.

Inspection trend by year

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
201960D
2024225K ▲

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

2 fines totaling $182,488.

DateTypeAmount / length
Sep 20, 2024Fine$170,450
Jan 28, 2024Fine$12,038

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityKentucky avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.593.713.95top 41% in Kentucky; bottom 41% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours1.050.740.69top 12% in Kentucky; top 14% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing2.973.273.50bottom 48% in Kentucky; bottom 30% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.770.530.48top 14% in Kentucky; top 12% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)64.746.445.8bottom 7% in Kentucky; bottom 10% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)60.041.842.9bottom 21% in Kentucky; bottom 22% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.98, RN 1.17, weekend 3.29. Staffing rating: 3/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Asbr Holdings LLCOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest05/01/2018
Jjla LLCOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest12/01/2015
LPSNF LLCOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest12/01/2015
SHC LP Holdings LLCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%12/01/2015
Steier III, ElmerIndividual5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest12/01/2015
Wheaten LLCOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest12/01/2015
Cocanougher, DesiraeIndividualW-2 Managing EmployeeNOT APPLICABLE06/12/2023
Harrison, JohnIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2007
Signature Healthcare LLCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2015

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Signature Healthcare at Rockford Rehab & Wellness0.8 miLouisville, KY★★★★★5/5
Parkwood Health & Rehabilitation1.9 miLouisville, KY★☆☆☆☆2/5
Signature Healthcare of South Louisville4.1 miLouisville, KY★★★★☆3/5
Park Terrace Health Campus5.2 miLouisville, KY★★★★☆4/5
Essex Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center5.3 miLouisville, KY★★☆☆☆3/5
Treyton Oak Towers5.3 miLouisville, KY★☆☆☆☆1/5
River Oaks Health & Rehabilitation5.5 miLouisville, KY★☆☆☆☆2/5
Chestnut Ridge Health & Rehabilitation5.5 miLouisville, KY★☆☆☆☆1/5
Eastway Health & Rehabilitation6.4 miLouisville, KY★☆☆☆☆1/5
Little Sisters of the Poor6.4 miLouisville, KY★★☆☆☆3/5
Kindred Hospital - Louisville6.8 miLouisville, KY★★☆☆☆2/5
Nazareth Home7.1 miLouisville, KY★★★★★5/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Louisville →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 185300.