IowaCedar Rapids

Harmony Cedar Rapids

1940 First Avenue NE, Cedar Rapids, IA 52402 · Linn County · 96 certified beds · avg 78 residents/day · certified since Jan 1, 1967

Part of chain: LEGACY HEALTHCARE (89 facilities, chain avg rating 2.9★)

1/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
4
Serious findings on record
$10,509
Fines, last 3 years
3.68
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★☆☆☆☆1/5 · CMS overall rating: 1/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Aug 2, 2023 · F-0690 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections.

Why it matters: Poor continence and catheter care leads to infections, skin breakdown, and loss of dignity.

Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.

Corrected: Aug 22, 2023 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Aug 2, 2023 · F-0880 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.

Why it matters: Weak infection control lets illnesses like flu, COVID-19, and drug-resistant infections spread quickly among vulnerable residents.

Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.

Corrected: Aug 22, 2023 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Dec 23, 2025 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Aug 2, 2023 · F-0697 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it.

Why it matters: Untreated pain causes needless suffering and can lead to depression, poor sleep, and declining health.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Aug 22, 2023 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (27)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Apr 21, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint
Mar 3, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have enough nursing staff each day to meet every resident's needs, or did not have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift. Adequate staffing is one of the strongest predictors of good care.
Mar 3, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs.
Mar 3, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.
Mar 3, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
Mar 3, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow.
Mar 3, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Mar 3, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe, appropriate care for residents who need dialysis — the treatment that filters the blood when kidneys fail.
Mar 3, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time.
Mar 3, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide or arrange dental services for its residents. Nursing homes are responsible for making sure residents can get dental care.
Dec 23, 2025▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Jan 15, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have enough nursing staff each day to meet every resident's needs, or did not have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift. Adequate staffing is one of the strongest predictors of good care.
Jan 15, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care.
Jan 15, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not enter each resident's assessment information into the required format and send it to the state within 7 days of completing the assessment, as the rules require.
Jan 15, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.
Jan 15, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not properly complete the required screening (called PASARR) that identifies whether a person entering a nursing home has a mental illness or intellectual disability and needs specialized services. · from a complaint
Nov 7, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · from a complaint
Nov 7, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · from a complaint
Nov 7, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Nov 7, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint
Jun 12, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · from a complaint
Jun 12, 2024B · Minimal risk, repeatedThe facility did not give residents proper notice about what Medicare or Medicaid covers, or about charges the resident might owe for services that aren't covered. · from a complaint
Mar 28, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make sure its nurses and nurse aides had the skills and training needed to properly care for every resident.
Mar 28, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits.
Aug 2, 2023▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-offThe facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections. · from a complaint
Aug 2, 2023▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint
Aug 2, 2023▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it. · from a complaint

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (4 → 9).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202333J ▲
202480D
202561G ▲
2026100E

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

1 fine totaling $10,509.

DateTypeAmount / length
Dec 23, 2025Fine$10,509

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityIowa avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.684.373.95bottom 16% in Iowa; bottom 45% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.540.850.69bottom 15% in Iowa; bottom 43% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.363.863.50bottom 26% in Iowa; top 50% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.370.510.48bottom 30% in Iowa; bottom 46% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)74.044.045.8bottom 3% in Iowa; bottom 4% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)63.642.142.9bottom 20% in Iowa; bottom 17% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.70, RN 0.54, weekend 3.38. Staffing rating: 2/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: 3/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Limited Liability company

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Doros Generation Trust U/A/D 1/3/12Organization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest26%04/01/2023
GPN Family Trust U/A/D 4/28/08Organization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest60%04/01/2023
Oakway Operations LLCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest15%04/01/2023
Forbright BankOrganization5% or Greater Security InterestNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2023
Forbright BankOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2023
Knapp, JustinIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/29/2025
Knapp, JustinIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/29/2025
Legacy Healthcare Financial Services LLCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2023
Legacy Healthcare Financial Services LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE11/18/2025
Miller Cooper & Co, LTDOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2024
Shabat, MenachemIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2023
Shabat, MenachemIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2023
Shabat, MenachemIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2023
Stenberg, EricIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2023
Stenberg, EricIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2023

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Cottage Grove Place0.3 miCedar Rapids, IA★☆☆☆☆1/5
Living Center West1.2 miCedar Rapids, IA★★☆☆☆2/5
St Luke's Helen G Nassif Transitional Care Center2.3 miCedar Rapids, IA★★★★★4/5
Linn Manor Care Center2.7 miMarion, IA★★☆☆☆2/5
Meth-Wick Health Center2.7 miCedar Rapids, IA★★★★★5/5
Northbrook Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center3.4 miCedar Rapids, IA★☆☆☆☆1/5
West Ridge Care Center3.8 miCedar Rapids, IA★★★★★5/5
Silver Oak Nursing and Rehabilitation Center LLC4.1 miMarion, IA★☆☆☆☆1/5
Hiawatha Care Center4.2 miHiawatha, IA★★★☆☆3/5
Oakview Nursing & Rehablitation - Marion4.2 miMarion, IA★★★★☆4/5
Terrace Glen Village4.4 miMarion, IA★★★★★4/5
Hallmar Village4.5 miCedar Rapids, IA★★☆☆☆2/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Cedar Rapids →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 165017.