OhioCincinnati

Ivy Woods Healthcare Center.

2025 Wyoming Avenue, Cincinnati, OH 45205 · Hamilton County · 99 certified beds · avg 92 residents/day · certified since Apr 17, 1980

Part of chain: COMMUNICARE HEALTH (110 facilities, chain avg rating 3.2★)

3/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
1
Serious findings on record
$14,528
Fines, last 3 years
3.00
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Oct 5, 2023 · F-0697

The facility did not provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it.

Why it matters: Untreated pain causes needless suffering and can lead to depression, poor sleep, and declining health.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Dec 6, 2023 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (37)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Jan 17, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.
Jan 17, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make sure residents were fully informed about their own health, care, and treatments in a way they could understand.
Jan 17, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Jan 17, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility used bed rails without first trying safer alternatives, or without assessing the resident's safety risk, discussing the risks and benefits with the resident or family, getting consent, and installing the rails correctly.
Jan 17, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time.
Jan 17, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards.
Jan 17, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Jun 25, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections. · from a complaint
Nov 16, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Nov 16, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it. · from a complaint
Oct 5, 2023▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it.
Oct 5, 2023F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility's quality committee — the internal group responsible for finding and fixing care problems — did not have the required members or did not meet at least every three months.
Oct 5, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility's menus did not meet residents' nutritional needs, or were not prepared in advance, followed as written, kept up to date, or reviewed by a dietician.
Oct 5, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Oct 5, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not keep all essential equipment working safely — things like heating and cooling systems, kitchen equipment, and medical devices.
Oct 5, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
Oct 5, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups.
Oct 5, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care.
Oct 5, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents' personal and medical information private and confidential.
Oct 5, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs.
Oct 5, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft. These written safeguards are the foundation of resident protection.
Oct 5, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do.
Oct 5, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not give residents (and their representatives and the ombudsman, a state advocate for residents) proper advance notice before a transfer or discharge, including information about their right to appeal.
Oct 5, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
Oct 5, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems.
Oct 5, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide timely, quality laboratory tests to meet residents' needs.
Oct 5, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide or arrange dental services for its residents. Nursing homes are responsible for making sure residents can get dental care.
Feb 20, 2020F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Feb 20, 2020D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
Feb 20, 2020D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care.
Feb 20, 2020D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs.
Feb 20, 2020D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility used physical restraints — devices that limit a resident's movement — when they weren't needed for medical treatment.
Feb 20, 2020D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.
Feb 20, 2020D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not properly plan a resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs after leaving.
Feb 20, 2020D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility used bed rails without first trying safer alternatives, or without assessing the resident's safety risk, discussing the risks and benefits with the resident or family, getting consent, and installing the rails correctly.
Feb 20, 2020D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits.
Feb 20, 2020D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (17 → 7).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
2020100F
2023191G ▲
202410D
202670E

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

1 fine totaling $14,528, plus 1 Medicare payment denial period.

DateTypeAmount / length
Oct 5, 2023Fine$14,528
Oct 5, 2023Payment Denial35 days from Nov 1, 2023

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityOhio avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.003.453.95bottom 25% in Ohio; bottom 14% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.510.600.69bottom 41% in Ohio; bottom 39% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing2.823.073.50bottom 40% in Ohio; bottom 22% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.530.420.48top 22% in Ohio; top 29% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)29.148.745.8top 6% in Ohio; top 13% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)25.043.942.9top 20% in Ohio; top 20% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.14, RN 0.53, weekend 2.95. Staffing rating: 2/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: —/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Buckeye Healthcare Holdings LLCOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest07/01/2021
Buckeye Op Co LLCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%07/01/2021
Omg MSTR Lsco, LLCOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest07/01/2021
Buckeye Healthcare Holdings LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2021
C.R. Stoltz Family Investment Company INCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2021
C.R. Stoltz Irrevocable TrustOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2021
Groves, DonnaIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE04/14/2023
Health Care Holdings, LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2021
I. Rosedale Family Investment Company INCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2021
I. Rosedale Irrevocable TrustOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2021
Khan, ShaziaIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2021
Khan, ShaziaIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2021
Odenthal, RichardIndividualIndividual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/25/2025
Omg MSTR Lsco, LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2021
R.S. Wilheim Irrevocable TrustOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2021
Romeo, DominicIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2023
Romeo, DominicIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2023
Ronald S Wilheim 2012 Spousal TrustOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2021
Rosedale Family Investment Company, INCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2021
RRW, LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2021

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Harrison Pavilion Care Center0.8 miCincinnati, OH★☆☆☆☆2/5
Edith Lane of Cincinnati1.1 miCincinnati, OH★★☆☆☆1/5
Aventura at West Park1.5 miCincinnati, OH★☆☆☆☆1/5
Clifton Healthcare Center2.6 miCincinnati, OH★★★☆☆2/5
Seven Acres Senior Living at Clifton2.8 miCincinnati, OH★★★★☆3/5
Brookside Healthcare Center2.8 miCincinnati, OH★★★★★4/5
Terrace View Gardens3.0 miCincinnati, OH★★★★★4/5
Hillebrand Nursing and Rehabilitation Center3.5 miCincinnati, OH★★☆☆☆2/5
Bridgetown Nursing and Rehabilitation Centre3.5 miCheviot, OH★★☆☆☆2/5
Scarlet Oaks Nursing and Rehabilitation Center3.6 miCincinnati, OH★★★☆☆3/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Cincinnati →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 365455.